🚀 go-pugleaf

More anti-Celeron info:
http://www.anandtech.com/cpu/showdoc.html?i=1927

Anandtech's benchmarks show that a Celeron 2.6 GHz is slower than a P4 1.8
GHz in practically all tests.

"Cari" <Newsgroups1@coribright.com> wrote in message
news:bu464d$de5jj$1@ID-119682.news.uni-berlin.de...
> Here's a comparison...
>
> Celeron 2.0Ghz..... 512mb PC133RAM
>
> One Setiathome work unit.... 15 hours
>
> P4 2.0Ghz..... 512mb RAM PC133 RAM
>
> One Setiathome work unit 5 hours
>
> P4 2.0Ghz 1Ghz PC2100 RAM
>
> One Setiathome work unit   3.2 hours
>
> No, I'm never even contemplating a Celeron procesor ever again.
>
> Cari
> www.coribright.com
>
> "andrew2000" <andrew2000@mad.scientist.com> wrote in message
> news:aV5Nb.16566$Eq.9527@clgrps12...
> >I use Celerons often and have no problems - including video editing.
they
> > are a bit slower in the benchmarks. but not noticeable in the "feel" of
> > the
> > system. regardless of what you use be sure to use good quality ram - 512
> > mb
> > is a nice number.
> > "Taishi" <taishi_bak@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:Zc0tb.684$gc.354@newssvr24.news.prodigy.com...
> >> I did some research on the internet about the CPU's in question.  I see
> > that
> >> the Celeron is a cheaper CPU than the P4.
> >>
> >> Do anyone know the story behind the Celeron?
> >>
> >> Has anyone seen a big difference between a Celeron 2.4 vs a Intel P4
PC?
> >>
> >> Are there any Con's to having a Celeron over a P4?
> >>
> >> Is there a big difference between a Celeron 2.4 vs 2.5?
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>