🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: alt.comp.hardware
Article #3229

Re: Best configuration for a twin-processor board

#3229
From: kony
Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2005 05:18
29 lines
2616 bytes
On 8 Jul 2005 21:42:59 -0700, letterzone@yahoo.com wrote:

>My PC has an Azza 810-DTC twin-processor motherboard. It is a 100-FSB
>board that can take a 133-FSB 370-pin processor due to a CPU-Booster
>card present in its Slot-I. Working on Windows XP, I am using a 400-MHz
>370-pin Celeron processor with 384-MB 100-FSB RAM on this board, but
>now I wish to upgrade the processor. I can use either (a) one 1000-MHz
>133-FSB 370-pin Coppermine-EB non-Taulatine Pentium III processor or
>(b) two 800-MHz 100-FSB Pentium III processors (one 370-pin and one
>Slot-I) on the board. Which of these two configurations will have a
>higher overall processing speed?
>
>Thanks,
>Gyan

What will you be running on the system, the most demanding
tasks?

For typical desktop use, the faster configuration would
usually be the 1000MHz P3 w/133FSB.  For a host-processing
intensive server, the pair of P3 800 MHz may be faster.
Are you certain that you will be able to run the two 800MHz
CPUs in the configuration you describe?  

Frankly, I would not upgrade that motherboard unless you can
get the CPUs very cheaply.  Since you are concerned about
the performance benefits, clearly the best performance would
come from even the cheapest of modern technology.  That is,
unless you have a LOT of memory you need to reuse.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <jhnuc1dpp81i39fuq26en8dq1gb6uojsv2@4ax.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!wns13feed!worldnet.att.net!attbi_s21.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
References: <1120884179.160996.40470@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: f5f89,299fa3183d47c403
X-Google-Thread: 10a2ed,299fa3183d47c403
X-Google-Thread: f583c,299fa3183d47c403
X-Google-Thread: fdc9c,299fa3183d47c403
X-Google-Thread: 108f8f,299fa3183d47c403
X-Google-Attributes: gidf5f89,gid10a2ed,gidf583c,gidfdc9c,gid108f8f,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!wns13feed!worldnet.att.net!attbi_s21.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
From: kony <spam@spam.com>
Newsgroups: alt.comp.hardware,alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt,alt.comp.periphs.mainboard,intel.microprocessors.pentium_iii,microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware
Subject: Re: Best configuration for a twin-processor board
Reply-To: spam@spam.com
Message-ID: <jhnuc1dpp81i39fuq26en8dq1gb6uojsv2@4ax.com>
References: <1120884179.160996.40470@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 29
NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.203.138.253
X-Complaints-To: abuse@asp.att.net
X-Trace: attbi_s21 1120886292 12.203.138.253 (Sat, 09 Jul 2005 05:18:12 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2005 05:18:12 GMT
Organization: AT&T ASP.att.net
Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2005 05:18:12 GMT