Article View: alt.comp.hardware
Article #3229Re: Best configuration for a twin-processor board
From: kony
Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2005 05:18
Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2005 05:18
29 lines
2616 bytes
2616 bytes
On 8 Jul 2005 21:42:59 -0700, letterzone@yahoo.com wrote: >My PC has an Azza 810-DTC twin-processor motherboard. It is a 100-FSB >board that can take a 133-FSB 370-pin processor due to a CPU-Booster >card present in its Slot-I. Working on Windows XP, I am using a 400-MHz >370-pin Celeron processor with 384-MB 100-FSB RAM on this board, but >now I wish to upgrade the processor. I can use either (a) one 1000-MHz >133-FSB 370-pin Coppermine-EB non-Taulatine Pentium III processor or >(b) two 800-MHz 100-FSB Pentium III processors (one 370-pin and one >Slot-I) on the board. Which of these two configurations will have a >higher overall processing speed? > >Thanks, >Gyan What will you be running on the system, the most demanding tasks? For typical desktop use, the faster configuration would usually be the 1000MHz P3 w/133FSB. For a host-processing intensive server, the pair of P3 800 MHz may be faster. Are you certain that you will be able to run the two 800MHz CPUs in the configuration you describe? Frankly, I would not upgrade that motherboard unless you can get the CPUs very cheaply. Since you are concerned about the performance benefits, clearly the best performance would come from even the cheapest of modern technology. That is, unless you have a LOT of memory you need to reuse.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<jhnuc1dpp81i39fuq26en8dq1gb6uojsv2@4ax.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!wns13feed!worldnet.att.net!attbi_s21.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mailReferences:
<1120884179.160996.40470@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: f5f89,299fa3183d47c403 X-Google-Thread: 10a2ed,299fa3183d47c403 X-Google-Thread: f583c,299fa3183d47c403 X-Google-Thread: fdc9c,299fa3183d47c403 X-Google-Thread: 108f8f,299fa3183d47c403 X-Google-Attributes: gidf5f89,gid10a2ed,gidf583c,gidfdc9c,gid108f8f,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!wns13feed!worldnet.att.net!attbi_s21.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail From: kony <spam@spam.com> Newsgroups: alt.comp.hardware,alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt,alt.comp.periphs.mainboard,intel.microprocessors.pentium_iii,microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware Subject: Re: Best configuration for a twin-processor board Reply-To: spam@spam.com Message-ID: <jhnuc1dpp81i39fuq26en8dq1gb6uojsv2@4ax.com> References: <1120884179.160996.40470@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 29 NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.203.138.253 X-Complaints-To: abuse@asp.att.net X-Trace: attbi_s21 1120886292 12.203.138.253 (Sat, 09 Jul 2005 05:18:12 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2005 05:18:12 GMT Organization: AT&T ASP.att.net Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2005 05:18:12 GMT