🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: alt.comp.hardware
Article #886

Re: Keyboard wear

#886
From: Rod Speed
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 06:16
63 lines
3690 bytes
Hi there! <nospam@somewhere.com> wrote in message
news:8Asw8.42420$QC1.2899668@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...

> Microsoft makes some of the best designed and innovative keyboards.

Yeah, no complaints about it apart from the wear of the letters.

> In fact, most all of Microsoft's peripherals are better made
> and designed than competitors offerings.  (Although I do
> prefer the design of the Logitech Wireless Mouseman)

Yeah, they are both head to head with that stuff, keyboards and mice.

> I've never seen the lettering wear off of
> Microsoft keyboards under heavy use.

Weird. Maybe its just a dud batch like someone else
said. The plastic used isnt hard enough or something.

> The other company that I know of that
> makes excellent keyboards is IBM.

Yeah, no argument there. Loved the original PC keyboard and the AT too.

> Although I'm not sure of IBM quality these days after
> the utter fiasco/melt down of competence in their hard
> drive division that destroyed the division's sales.

And has now seen them flog that division off to Hitachi.

I havent kept up with their latest keyboards, you dont see
much said about them at all. I really should go for cordless
now, wasnt available when I got the corded keyboard and
optical mouse except at insane bleeding edge prices.

I wont normally by bleeding edge stuff like that anyway,
the next version is usually better, particularly with stuff
like that with stuff like the battery life etc.


> Rod Speed <rod_speed@yahoo.com> wrote

> > Looking at a decent modern cordless keyboard, dont care too much about
> > cost, basically want something that will last for years and is decent to
> use.
> >
> > I relatively recently got off my arse and sent for a decent
> > branded keyboard, instead of farting around with cheapys.
> > Went for the MS, for no particular reason, after getting
> > pissed off at how quickly the lettering wears off the cheapys.
> >
> > Only to find that the MS Internet Pro is already showing significant
> > wear with the lettering after 6 months use. And significant physical
> > wear on those keys too, basically the roughened surface is now smooth.
> >
> > Doesnt anyone do proper double shot injection moulded keytops anymore ?
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
Technical Details
Message-ID: <a9tlg9$6533p$1@ID-69072.news.dfncis.de>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!130.133.1.3!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!184.gri0102.gri.iprimus.net.AU!not-for-mail
References: <a9sivr$5pue2$1@ID-69072.news.dfncis.de> <8Asw8.42420$QC1.2899668@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10d683,bb1647a757b96fc3
X-Google-Attributes: gid10d683,public
X-Google-Thread: 108c83,bb1647a757b96fc3
X-Google-Attributes: gid108c83,public
X-Google-Thread: 10a2ed,bb1647a757b96fc3
X-Google-Attributes: gid10a2ed,public
X-Google-Thread: f5f89,bb1647a757b96fc3
X-Google-Attributes: gidf5f89,public
X-Google-Thread: f70d1,bb1647a757b96fc3
X-Google-Attributes: gidf70d1,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-04-20 23:16:45 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!130.133.1.3!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!184.gri0102.gri.iprimus.net.AU!not-for-mail
From: "Rod Speed" <rod_speed@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: alt.comp.hardware,alt.comp.hardware.homebuilt,alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt,aus.computers,aus.computers.ibm-pc
Subject: Re: Keyboard wear
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 16:16:42 +1000
Lines: 65
Message-ID: <a9tlg9$6533p$1@ID-69072.news.dfncis.de>
References: <a9sivr$5pue2$1@ID-69072.news.dfncis.de> <8Asw8.42420$QC1.2899668@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 184.gri0102.gri.iprimus.net.au (203.134.92.184)
X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 1019369802 6458489 203.134.92.184 (16 [69072])
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400