Article View: alt.comp.hardware
Article #968Re: 5.25 Vs 3.5 [Was: Why are more Floppy disks failing these days???]
From: Richard
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 1998 00:00
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 1998 00:00
78 lines
5187 bytes
5187 bytes
I agree that 5.25" 360k floppys are very reliable. I have several old programs from the early 80's still on them. I also had an old PCTOOLS backup set (100 360k floppys of an old PC hard disk 40 mb Full backup) and restored some old files from it a couple of years ago. The backup was over 10 years old. I reinstalled PC TOOLS from the original 360 K floppys on my older 486 (had a 1.2 mb floppy). I expected problems because of age of the disks, I was using a 400K PCTools special format on the floppy and used a 1.2 mb high density drive to restore. One of the rare times in my life that nothing went wrong using my PC! I expected hell! Amazing! Not that I did not have bad 360k floppys in my time with them. But I think I had very few. Got rid of all of them except for about 10 blanks plus original software. I find 1.44 floppys have a much shorter shelf like. For example, I have about 300 old 1.44 diskettes after I cleaned up when I got a Zip drive and moved all my data to them. I reformatted the floppys after copying. About 10-15 would not reformat (but I read the data off to the ZIP Okay). I tried other PCs floppys, tapped them on a desk (sometimes the hub is stuck) but they could not be reformatted. I did this about 2 years ago. Just recently, I needed about 30 of them. Many had read/write erros when I used them. I thought maybe age, storage, different floppy drive I am using today. Tried different PCs, still had a few dead ones. Reformatted them, still lost about 5 of them. Note these were good diskettes from about 5-7 years ago. Not the 25 diskettes for $10 today stuff. Must have paid $20-25 a box of 10. Strange. Glad I did not have data on them. Some I formatted okay but would not write all data without erros. I ran scandisk on them and they had bad sectors. Note I tried different PCs so it is not a bad floppy drive. Just my experience. And yes, I Know my Iomega Zip drive has the potential of being very a very bad expierence. I had read all about the Click of Death and had one Zip disk (the one they supplied, the Zip Tools disk) start the click but powered it off immediately and reformatted it. All okay for the past 6 months. Note I have 13 Zip disks, lucky or unlucky!!! No important data on them that can't be replaced. But I got sucked in with all the hype about the Zip drive and really wanted to get rid of all the floppy I had. Now I wonder about it. But there are not much choices for reliable backup and archive storage. Maybe CDs is the way to go, large capacity, cheap media, everyone has a CD-ROM to read them but expensive to get set up initially. Richard wrote: > > Ian Staples wrote: > > > Alecto <alecto@goulburn.net.au> writes: > > > > >The trouble is that thay have stoped making quality 3.5" disks nowdays > > >as the pricepoint of them in the market is too low for quality. > > >If you want to use floppys for long term storage then 1.2m 5.25" disks > > >are the best bet. > > > > While I don't have a direct comparison of 5.25 versus 3.5, I can > > confirm that the old 5.25" models were pretty good. About 6 months > > ago I copied files from about a dozen Wabash disks (as sold by the > > then Micro Educational, I think they called themselves) which had > > been used to transfer the files from the PDP-10 at JCU in Sep 1989. > > All files copied perfectly, without a single "stutter" from XCOPY. :-) > > my experience is similar - this is a bogus alarm. > > > > > > > Cheers, Ian S. > > > > -- > > > > Ian Staples MS-Mail: staplesi@dpi.qld.gov.au > > c/- P.O. Box 1054 MAREEBA Phone : +61 (0)70 928 555 Home 924 847 > > Queensland Australia 4880 Fax : +61 (0)70 923 593 " " " -- --------- Please remove the XYZ in the e-mail address if replying
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<358B3DC3.EF6163AE@XYZ.home.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<6jfeqk$2na$1@news.ramhb.co.nz> <355b90ec.4077901@news.zeta.org.au> <355C6D41.7F86@ibm.net> <356449B0.167EB0E7@cs.man.ac.uk> <357ca569.11060527@news2.ibm.net> <357DD32F.B4C42B2A@aol.com> <357DF297.62B1@goulburn.net.au> <EuqrCA.GwM@planet.ari.dpi.qld.gov.au> <6mcvfb$5i0@bgtnsc02.worldnet.att.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10d683,f0cdfaa7f521fb49 X-Google-Attributes: gid10d683,public X-Google-Thread: 109e38,f0cdfaa7f521fb49 X-Google-Attributes: gid109e38,public X-Google-Thread: f4d7c,f0cdfaa7f521fb49 X-Google-Attributes: gidf4d7c,public X-Google-Thread: f5f89,f0cdfaa7f521fb49 X-Google-Attributes: gidf5f89,public X-Google-Thread: 11196f,f0cdfaa7f521fb49 X-Google-Attributes: gid11196f,public From: Richard <richardm@XYZ.home.com> Subject: Re: 5.25 Vs 3.5 [Was: Why are more Floppy disks failing these days???] Date: 1998/06/20 Message-ID: <358B3DC3.EF6163AE@XYZ.home.com> X-Deja-AN: 364399500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <6jfeqk$2na$1@news.ramhb.co.nz> <355b90ec.4077901@news.zeta.org.au> <355C6D41.7F86@ibm.net> <356449B0.167EB0E7@cs.man.ac.uk> <357ca569.11060527@news2.ibm.net> <357DD32F.B4C42B2A@aol.com> <357DF297.62B1@goulburn.net.au> <EuqrCA.GwM@planet.ari.dpi.qld.gov.au> <6mcvfb$5i0@bgtnsc02.worldnet.att.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Organization: MFC MIME-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 19 Jun 1998 21:44:17 PDT Reply-To: richardm@XYZ.home.com Newsgroups: alt.comp.hardware,aus.computers.ibm-pc,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.misc,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.systems