🚀 go-pugleaf

Actually, if he upgraded his 4.52 to 5.0x, then tried to sell the older
version, that WOULD be a violation of the license.

Dennis
Ahriman God wrote in message <64r8pl$qan@news.wcc.net>...
>In article <64nsqo$rcu@dns.okc>, yeah@right.com says...
>>
>>
>>Malcolm wrote in message <64njq1$44o@camel21.mindspring.com>...
>>|Chris Marriott <chris@chrism.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>>|
>>|> In article <64l8ia$337@camel21.mindspring.com>, Malcolm
<get@a-life.com>
>>|> writes
>>|> >Dude, you are up against a wall here.  People are giving away BC 4.52
>>|> >with books and magazines.  You'll be hard pressed to get 150 clams for
>>|> >it.
>>|> >
>>|
>>|> There's a big difference. The Borland products being given away on
>>|> magazine covers (Borland Delphi, for example, is on the cover this
month
>>|> of one of the mags that I buy each month) do NOT come with a
>>|> distribution licence - it's illegal to distribute software written with
>>|> these versions of the software.
>>|
>>|> They're fine for learning with, but that's all you can do with them.
>>|
>>|> Chris
>>|
>>|Funny, that's not what the "no-nonsense" license agreement in my
>>|version says.  And I got it with a book from SAMS publishing.
>>
>> From Learn to Program w/ C ver 2.0 (BC++ 4.52)
>>  "You may reproduce and distribute, in executable form, programs which
you
>>create using this software, w/o additional fees or licenses"
>>
>>
>Let's quit being friggin idiots, huh?  1)  Why should I PAY for a copy of
4.52
>when I could simply pay 50$ for 5.0x?  Furthermore, if whatshisface wants
to
>sell his 4.52, so be it.  There's no infringement of copyright's
there...think
>on it.
>
>ahriman@wcc.net
>