Re: which C++ language is good

Article View: alt.comp.lang.learn.c-c++

Article #826

Back to alt.comp.lang.learn.c-c++ Previous Next

#826

From: Thomas Helvey
Date: Wed, 13 May 1998 00:00

21 lines
1428 bytes

In article <6jcd0d$lrl$1@imsp009a.netvigator.com>, wongdan@netvigator.com 
says...
>
>I'm total green in C++ language, but have some background in fortran 77
>
>Could any one tell where I can find information regarding the comparison
>between Visual C++ and Borland's one.
>
>I'm trying to learn one C++ language, any good suggestion.
>
First of all there really is only one C++ language.
Visual C++ and Borland C++ are implementations of the language.
Both compilers do a pretty good job of implementing the standard afaik.

Your choice then boils down to the feature set you want from the
implementation. (all of the stuffing) My advice is to compare the
feature sets and make your decision based on which seems the best
for your purposes. 

Regards

Technical Details

Message-ID: <3559f84a.0@204.120.4.15>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <6jcd0d$lrl$1@imsp009a.netvigator.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 114592,7c05b15a73b953ef
X-Google-Attributes: gid114592,public
X-Google-Thread: fdcad,7c05b15a73b953ef
X-Google-Attributes: gidfdcad,public
X-Google-Thread: 109fba,7c05b15a73b953ef
X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public
From: tomh@inxpress.net (Thomas Helvey)
Subject: Re: which C++ language is good
Date: 1998/05/13
Message-ID: <3559f84a.0@204.120.4.15>
X-Deja-AN: 352969657
References: <6jcd0d$lrl$1@imsp009a.netvigator.com>
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=US-ASCII
Organization: BleepSoft
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: alt.comp.lang.learn.c-c++,comp.lang.c++,fr.comp.lang.c++

Reply to Parent Message