🚀 go-pugleaf

Of course you can do everything in Linux. 
"Somewhere, over the rainbow... la la la"
In other words, Bilbo is full of it. 

-- 

"BillW50" <BillW50 aol.kom> wrote:

> Path: eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
> From: "BillW50" <BillW50 aol.kom>
> Newsgroups: alt.comp.os.windows-8
> Subject: Re: Windows Speech Recognition Macros?
> Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2012 09:58:56 -0600
> Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
> Lines: 59
> Message-ID: <k7oi02$c2v$1 dont-email.me>
> References: <k7m3it$9k1$2 dont-email.me> <k7mdms$b4v$2 dont-email.me> <k7mjva$k1r$1 dont-email.me>
> Injection-Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2012 15:58:58 +0000 (UTC)
> Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="a4e1ea6240c4386ead63d7468420e968"; logging-data="12383"; mail-complaints-to="abuse eternal-september.org";     posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+m277iZH214WfogQRhq/6q"
> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
> X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
> X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
> X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180
> X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 121111-0, 11/11/2012), Outbound message
> Cancel-Lock: sha1:m1qNlBvzvL1WZuVWrRMcEfN0z18=
> X-Priority: 3
> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> Xref: mx04.eternal-september.org alt.comp.os.windows-8:1128
> 
> In news:k7mjva$k1r$1 dont-email.me,
> John Doe typed on Sat, 10 Nov 2012 22:20:27 +0000 (UTC):
>> BillW50 <BillW50 aol.kom> wrote:
>>
>>> John Doe wrote:
>>
>>>> Anybody use them?
>>>
>>> I have tried them
>>
>> This subject is a different "them".
>>
>>> off and on since 1985. And so far, they haven't improved very
>>> much in the past 27 years IMHO.
>>
>> Apparently the thing is talking about speech recognition for
>> dictation, obviously, since speech activated scripting/macroing is
>> relatively new in Windows. And there is no such thing as speech
>> activated scripting in other operating systems.
>>
>> Power users who have been put off by speech recognition for
>> dictation should not be discouraged from trying speech recognition
>> for scripting/macroing. For a macro enthusiast, speech activated
>> scripting leaves keyboard activated scripting in the dust. There
>> is no comparison between the two, it's a whole new world. Since a
>> command vocabulary is tiny compared to a human vocabulary, the
>> stupid computer has a much easier time recognizing commands (as
>> opposed to recognizing speech).
> 
> How is this different than with Xandros (Linux) Voice Command utility? 
> Which allows you to open applications and shutdown the computer by voice 
> commands. Here is the list of available voice commands.
> 
> Computer Music
> Computer Clock
> Computer Dictionary
> Computer Notes
> Computer Calculator
> Computer Camera
> Computer Photo
> Computer Shutdown
> Computer Movie
> Computer Mail
> Computer Telephone
> Computer Messenger
> Computer Network
> Computer Web
> 
> Sure it is limited in commands. But the idea is the same. Nor is there 
> any training required. It seems to understand anybody.
> 
> REF: page 4-45 of the EeePC 4G/8G manual
> 
> -- 
> Bill
> Gateway M465e ('06 era) - OE-QuoteFix v1.19.2
> Centrino Core2 Duo T5600 1.83GHz - 4GB - Windows XP SP2 
> 
> 
> 
>