Re: DAE benchmark: CD Speed update [ reply to multigroup crosspost MWN110698]

Article View: alt.comp.periphs.cdr.mac

Article #12

Back to alt.comp.periphs.cdr.mac Previous Next

#12

From: terry russell
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 1998 00:00

41 lines
2858 bytes

Chris Severance wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 9 Jun 1998 03:21:56 +0200, "Erik" <erikd@REMOVETHISglo.be>
> wrote:
>
> >IMO the most reliable DAE quality test is when you extract tracks from a
> >known source but for obvious reasons this is impractical.
> If you have the Plextor, compare against that. It's the standard for
> now.
> 
> >Anyway, if you have any suggestions for a more reliable DAE test, let me
> >know :)
> Your test sounds pretty good. I recall some of the tracks DAEing
> correctly and some not. Maybe you just need to try more disks.
> 

I think he meant compare the DAE with original data, burn a known
track(s)
DAA back and compare, but that is just a test on a known good disk
rather than
average CD reading 
 if burnt on a CDR a good result would suggest the system works well
with all sources
a bad result would prove nothing about silver CD reading

 a better test would probbaly involve random blocks for an extended
period,noting the blocks,
then reread those some blocks in random order, then repeat , then do a
new set of blocks
until user gets bored;-)
 the random blocks list should have the very first and last explicitly
included
 
[ sorry about the continued crosspost something is wrong with my direct
mail]  

-- 
mordant@wantree.com.au
Disclaimer: all care taken, some truth may have slipped through
Theme Tune: en-n-ui,en-n-ui,en-n-ui,en-n-ui ("Amazin Gracie")

Technical Details

Message-ID: <357F5C1B.46B6@wantree.com.au>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References:

<6l4r1o$j3s$1@trex.antw.online.be> <358844b2.3542504@news.supernews.com> <6li6c6$96j$1@trex.antw.online.be> <35abe515.79978262@news.supernews.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10f3bc,e3b10a7cac6c233d
X-Google-Attributes: gid10f3bc,public
X-Google-Thread: 103c13,e3b10a7cac6c233d
X-Google-Attributes: gid103c13,public
X-Google-Thread: 1118d9,e3b10a7cac6c233d
X-Google-Attributes: gid1118d9,public
X-Google-Thread: 1024b8,e3b10a7cac6c233d
X-Google-Attributes: gid1024b8,public
X-Google-Thread: f9795,e3b10a7cac6c233d
X-Google-Attributes: gidf9795,public
X-Google-Thread: 104cf5,e3b10a7cac6c233d
X-Google-Attributes: gid104cf5,public
X-Google-Thread: fbad3,e3b10a7cac6c233d
X-Google-Attributes: gidfbad3,public
X-Google-Thread: 100a73,e3b10a7cac6c233d
X-Google-Attributes: gid100a73,public
From: terry russell <mordant@wantree.com.au>
Subject: Re: DAE benchmark: CD Speed update  [ reply to multigroup crosspost  MWN110698]
Date: 1998/06/11
Message-ID: <357F5C1B.46B6@wantree.com.au>
X-Deja-AN: 361581361
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <6l4r1o$j3s$1@trex.antw.online.be> <358844b2.3542504@news.supernews.com> <6li6c6$96j$1@trex.antw.online.be> <35abe515.79978262@news.supernews.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: mordant@wantree.com.au
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Organization: DIS
Newsgroups: alt.comp.periphs.cdr.mac,alt.philips.cdr.discussion,aus.computers.cdrom,comp.periphs.scsi,comp.publish.cdrom.hardware,comp.publish.cdrom.software,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.cd-rom,de.comp.periph.cdrom

Reply to Parent Message