🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: alt.comp.periphs.cdr
Article #129

Re: Writing on CDR's

#129
From: Tim Kroesen
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2004 22:00
66 lines
4590 bytes
A whiff of a 'CDR' "Safe" Pen will reveal something startling...<g>

Tim K

"Phred" <ppnerkDELETETHIS@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:bvj1df$shhhe$1@ID-151056.news.uni-berlin.de...
> In article <uETSb.4415$jH6.1888@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net>,
> "Tim Kroesen" <tkroesen@earthlink.net> wrote:
> >"Theo" <invalid@noemail.com> wrote in message
> >news:Xns948176A947F77densnews123@216.168.3.44...
> >> "normanstrong" <normanstrong@comcast.net> wrote in
> news:oTQSb.152916$nt4.706795@attbi_s51:
> >>
> >> > I agree, but make sure you have a bottle of alcohol near by.  If
> >> > you make a mistake, you can wipe it off immediately and redo it.
> >>
> >> I thought alcohol was supposed to be bad for CDRs.
> >
> >Soaking overnight may be bad... Wiping off the marks of an Alcohol
based
> >pen like a Sharpie is likely to cause no more 'damage' than the
marker
> >itself.  None have demonstrated that relatively inert (to CD topping
> >Lacquer) Alcohol can cause damage cleaning off writing; rather the
>
> Nonetheless, many CDR packs carry a warning in the fine print that
> says NOT to use alcohol-based inks for writing on the things.
>
> I mentioned several brands of "CDR Pens" previously, but one I didn't
> mention (because I've forgotten the name, and it's not here %-)
> actually claimed to be "water based".  I had real doubts about how
> well it would work as such inks tend not to stick on hard shiney
> surfaces.  But it seems to be okay, if you're not *too* impatient.  It
> was available in Fine in a four-colour pack (from OfficeWorks in Oz
> IIRC).
>
> I'd really like to know if there is any formulation difference between
> the Staedtler LUMOCOLOR OHP series and their "CD-R PEN", or whether
> this new model for CDRs is just a marketing ploy.  It's of some
> practical interest, because the OHP pens are commonly available in
> three size ranges (Superfine, Fine, and Medium) and in six-colour
> packs as well as individual colours; whereas the "CD-R PEN" is only in
> Medium/Black around here, and not readily available anyway.
>
> >'damage' claims refer to 'dye migration' (the substances left after
the
> >vehicle solvent evaporates that make the mark visible) into the
> >substrate over time.  Possible I'd agree it might be an issue; but
more
> >likely hoodoo IMO.
> >
> >If Sharpies 'dye' do indeed damage CD surfaces it must take many more
> >Years than they have already been used; otherwise we'd be up to our
ears
> >by now in *evidence* they do...  Note that *some* markers where shown
to
> >damage CD top Lacquer in the past; they likely contained much
'rougher'
> >vehicle solvents than Alcohol...
>
>
> Cheers, Phred.
>
> --
> ppnerkDELETE@THISyahoo.com.INVALID
>
Technical Details
Message-ID: <iMzTb.6797$jH6.341@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!newsfeed2.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!crtntx1-snh1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!newsfeed1.easynews.com!easynews.com!easynews!elnk-pas-nf1!newsfeed.earthlink.net!stamper.news.pas.earthlink.net!stamper.news.atl.earthlink.net!newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net.POSTED!58224bdf!not-for-mail
References: <uGBSb.31555$ef.25942@twister01.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com> <RMBSb.75988$fgk.39027@news01.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com> <srql10p9uojiasu98gli3bjfrrndfil82s@4ax.com> <VfCSb.32083$ef.12885@twister01.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com> <VzCSb.3762$gl2.3434@lakeread05> <oTQSb.152916$nt4.706795@attbi_s51> <Xns948176A947F77densnews123@216.168.3.44> <uETSb.4415$jH6.1888@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net> <bvj1df$shhhe$1@ID-151056.news.uni-berlin.de>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10f3c1,4af6cf079681fc49
X-Google-Attributes: gid10f3c1,public
X-Google-Thread: 100a73,1aeead3b20e688d5
X-Google-Attributes: gid100a73,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-02-02 14:00:47 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!newsfeed2.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!crtntx1-snh1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!newsfeed1.easynews.com!easynews.com!easynews!elnk-pas-nf1!newsfeed.earthlink.net!stamper.news.pas.earthlink.net!stamper.news.atl.earthlink.net!newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net.POSTED!58224bdf!not-for-mail
From: "Tim Kroesen" <tkroesen@earthlink.net>
Newsgroups: alt.comp.periphs.cdr,aus.computers.cdrom
References: <uGBSb.31555$ef.25942@twister01.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com> <RMBSb.75988$fgk.39027@news01.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com> <srql10p9uojiasu98gli3bjfrrndfil82s@4ax.com> <VfCSb.32083$ef.12885@twister01.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com> <VzCSb.3762$gl2.3434@lakeread05> <oTQSb.152916$nt4.706795@attbi_s51> <Xns948176A947F77densnews123@216.168.3.44> <uETSb.4415$jH6.1888@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net> <bvj1df$shhhe$1@ID-151056.news.uni-berlin.de>
Subject: Re: Writing on CDR's
Lines: 67
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Message-ID: <iMzTb.6797$jH6.341@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2004 22:00:46 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 67.73.182.195
X-Complaints-To: abuse@earthlink.net
X-Trace: newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net 1075759246 67.73.182.195 (Mon, 02 Feb 2004 14:00:46 PST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2004 14:00:46 PST
Organization: EarthLink Inc. -- http://www.EarthLink.net