Article View: alt.comp.periphs.cdr
Article #129Re: Writing on CDR's
From: Tim Kroesen
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2004 22:00
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2004 22:00
66 lines
4590 bytes
4590 bytes
A whiff of a 'CDR' "Safe" Pen will reveal something startling...<g> Tim K "Phred" <ppnerkDELETETHIS@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:bvj1df$shhhe$1@ID-151056.news.uni-berlin.de... > In article <uETSb.4415$jH6.1888@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net>, > "Tim Kroesen" <tkroesen@earthlink.net> wrote: > >"Theo" <invalid@noemail.com> wrote in message > >news:Xns948176A947F77densnews123@216.168.3.44... > >> "normanstrong" <normanstrong@comcast.net> wrote in > news:oTQSb.152916$nt4.706795@attbi_s51: > >> > >> > I agree, but make sure you have a bottle of alcohol near by. If > >> > you make a mistake, you can wipe it off immediately and redo it. > >> > >> I thought alcohol was supposed to be bad for CDRs. > > > >Soaking overnight may be bad... Wiping off the marks of an Alcohol based > >pen like a Sharpie is likely to cause no more 'damage' than the marker > >itself. None have demonstrated that relatively inert (to CD topping > >Lacquer) Alcohol can cause damage cleaning off writing; rather the > > Nonetheless, many CDR packs carry a warning in the fine print that > says NOT to use alcohol-based inks for writing on the things. > > I mentioned several brands of "CDR Pens" previously, but one I didn't > mention (because I've forgotten the name, and it's not here %-) > actually claimed to be "water based". I had real doubts about how > well it would work as such inks tend not to stick on hard shiney > surfaces. But it seems to be okay, if you're not *too* impatient. It > was available in Fine in a four-colour pack (from OfficeWorks in Oz > IIRC). > > I'd really like to know if there is any formulation difference between > the Staedtler LUMOCOLOR OHP series and their "CD-R PEN", or whether > this new model for CDRs is just a marketing ploy. It's of some > practical interest, because the OHP pens are commonly available in > three size ranges (Superfine, Fine, and Medium) and in six-colour > packs as well as individual colours; whereas the "CD-R PEN" is only in > Medium/Black around here, and not readily available anyway. > > >'damage' claims refer to 'dye migration' (the substances left after the > >vehicle solvent evaporates that make the mark visible) into the > >substrate over time. Possible I'd agree it might be an issue; but more > >likely hoodoo IMO. > > > >If Sharpies 'dye' do indeed damage CD surfaces it must take many more > >Years than they have already been used; otherwise we'd be up to our ears > >by now in *evidence* they do... Note that *some* markers where shown to > >damage CD top Lacquer in the past; they likely contained much 'rougher' > >vehicle solvents than Alcohol... > > > Cheers, Phred. > > -- > ppnerkDELETE@THISyahoo.com.INVALID >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<iMzTb.6797$jH6.341@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!newsfeed2.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!crtntx1-snh1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!newsfeed1.easynews.com!easynews.com!easynews!elnk-pas-nf1!newsfeed.earthlink.net!stamper.news.pas.earthlink.net!stamper.news.atl.earthlink.net!newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net.POSTED!58224bdf!not-for-mailReferences:
<uGBSb.31555$ef.25942@twister01.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com> <RMBSb.75988$fgk.39027@news01.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com> <srql10p9uojiasu98gli3bjfrrndfil82s@4ax.com> <VfCSb.32083$ef.12885@twister01.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com> <VzCSb.3762$gl2.3434@lakeread05> <oTQSb.152916$nt4.706795@attbi_s51> <Xns948176A947F77densnews123@216.168.3.44> <uETSb.4415$jH6.1888@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net> <bvj1df$shhhe$1@ID-151056.news.uni-berlin.de>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10f3c1,4af6cf079681fc49 X-Google-Attributes: gid10f3c1,public X-Google-Thread: 100a73,1aeead3b20e688d5 X-Google-Attributes: gid100a73,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-02-02 14:00:47 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!newsfeed2.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!crtntx1-snh1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!newsfeed1.easynews.com!easynews.com!easynews!elnk-pas-nf1!newsfeed.earthlink.net!stamper.news.pas.earthlink.net!stamper.news.atl.earthlink.net!newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net.POSTED!58224bdf!not-for-mail From: "Tim Kroesen" <tkroesen@earthlink.net> Newsgroups: alt.comp.periphs.cdr,aus.computers.cdrom References: <uGBSb.31555$ef.25942@twister01.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com> <RMBSb.75988$fgk.39027@news01.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com> <srql10p9uojiasu98gli3bjfrrndfil82s@4ax.com> <VfCSb.32083$ef.12885@twister01.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com> <VzCSb.3762$gl2.3434@lakeread05> <oTQSb.152916$nt4.706795@attbi_s51> <Xns948176A947F77densnews123@216.168.3.44> <uETSb.4415$jH6.1888@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net> <bvj1df$shhhe$1@ID-151056.news.uni-berlin.de> Subject: Re: Writing on CDR's Lines: 67 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Message-ID: <iMzTb.6797$jH6.341@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net> Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2004 22:00:46 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 67.73.182.195 X-Complaints-To: abuse@earthlink.net X-Trace: newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net 1075759246 67.73.182.195 (Mon, 02 Feb 2004 14:00:46 PST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2004 14:00:46 PST Organization: EarthLink Inc. -- http://www.EarthLink.net