Article View: alt.comp.periphs.cdr
Article #217Re: Tools for dubious audio CDs
From: Brilliant Pebbles
Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2002 00:19
Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2002 00:19
63 lines
3796 bytes
3796 bytes
Rod, you are a moron!!! "Rod Speed" <rod_speed@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:3c32229c_1@news.iprimus.com.au... > > kittykat <kittykat@nothere.com> wrote in message > news:3C314F19.10BC57F4@nothere.com... > > Rod Speed wrote > > >> What are people using for looking at dubious burnt audio CDs ? > > >> I've got one that has clearly been burnt on a TDK CD-R Audio blank > >> which is fine with the earlier tracks, but wont even play with most of > >> the last half of the tracks, even just with mediaplayer with the CDR > >> in the burner. Cant copy it with EZCD, endlessly rereads track 9 in > >> the very early copy phase where its scanning the tracks. > > >> Looks very likely the felt tipped pen used to label the CDR has corrupted > >> the label, you can see a vague image of one large letter of the label when > >> you look in the non label side. While that doesnt occupy half the radial > >> distance, and its only a very small part of the outer circumference, likely > >> there is more affected than you can see by eye and thats the problem. > > > Try ripping each individual song to HDD first > > (Try EAC or CDDAE - both available on web) > > I actually meant a tool that would list the errors, rather than how > to get whats possible from the CD, didnt say that very clearly. > > > You may have to skip the damaged song, track 9. > > It appears to have affected about half the tracks, like I said early > on. I was basically looking for a tool that would give me a clear > display of errors per track so I could see how many of the bad > tracks the owner of the CD cared about recovering. > > > By the way do you recall what you called me about a year > > ago when I posted regarding felt pens damaging CD's ? > > Just your fantasy/lying. I just commented on your peurile antics > about working out which was the writeable side of the blank. > > As far as the use of felt tipped pens are concerned, I JUST > said that you dont see reports of the Sanford Sharpies producing > that result, NOT felt pens in general. And you yourself said > that you hadnt seen any problem when using a sharpie. > http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&selm=3b3d19b8%241%40news.iprimus.com.a u > > > Anyway thats history, so try those tools, and try using a specialty > > CD pen (eg Stadler) even though you find the tips too thick. > > It wasnt one I wrote on, it clearly aint, its obscenely > thick, much worse than the Staedler or TDK. > > >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<TtrY7.58110$HW3.30571@newsfeeds.bigpond.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!newsfeed.direct.ca!look.ca!news.maxwell.syr.edu!intgwpad.nntp.telstra.net!newsfeeds.bigpond.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<3c31020b$1_2@news.iprimus.com.au> <3C314F19.10BC57F4@nothere.com> <3c32229c_1@news.iprimus.com.au>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10f3c1,b466e71b4b33a23a X-Google-Attributes: gid10f3c1,public X-Google-Thread: 108c83,b466e71b4b33a23a X-Google-Attributes: gid108c83,public X-Google-Thread: 100a73,b466e71b4b33a23a X-Google-Attributes: gid100a73,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-01-01 15:23:01 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!newsfeed.direct.ca!look.ca!news.maxwell.syr.edu!intgwpad.nntp.telstra.net!newsfeeds.bigpond.com!not-for-mail From: "Brilliant Pebbles" <sparque@bigpond.com> Newsgroups: alt.comp.periphs.cdr,aus.computers,aus.computers.cdrom References: <3c31020b$1_2@news.iprimus.com.au> <3C314F19.10BC57F4@nothere.com> <3c32229c_1@news.iprimus.com.au> Subject: Re: Tools for dubious audio CDs Lines: 65 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Message-ID: <TtrY7.58110$HW3.30571@newsfeeds.bigpond.com> Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 10:19:29 +1000 NNTP-Posting-Host: 203.54.213.216 X-Trace: newsfeeds.bigpond.com 1009927155 203.54.213.216 (Wed, 02 Jan 2002 10:19:15 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2002 10:19:15 EST Organization: Telstra BigPond Internet Services (http://www.bigpond.com)