Re: Mustek 1200 ED Vs. Mustek 1200 CD+

Article View: alt.comp.periphs.scanner

Article #212

Back to alt.comp.periphs.scanner Previous Next

#212

From: AJP
Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2000 00:00

3 lines
1081 bytes

As a former Mustek user I would say:
If you don't already own one of these machines or someone is gifting you one
of them you would probably do better to look into other brands.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <wLDv4.10461$r05.433644@typhoon-la.pbi.net>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <89lfhm$253$1@news3.inter.net.il>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10e07b,3103cedd4a7c0a1f
X-Google-Attributes: gid10e07b,public
X-Google-Thread: 10a4b5,3103cedd4a7c0a1f
X-Google-Attributes: gid10a4b5,public
X-Google-Thread: f75de,3103cedd4a7c0a1f
X-Google-Attributes: gidf75de,public
From: "AJP" <apquilts@pacbell.net>
Subject: Re: Mustek 1200 ED Vs. Mustek 1200 CD+
Date: 2000/03/02
Message-ID: <wLDv4.10461$r05.433644@typhoon-la.pbi.net>
X-Deja-AN: 592461841
References: <89lfhm$253$1@news3.inter.net.il>
X-Priority: 3
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
X-Complaints-To: abuse@pacbell.net
X-Trace: typhoon-la.pbi.net 952043612 63.194.113.38 (Thu, 02 Mar 2000 16:33:32 PST)
Organization: SBC Internet Services
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2000 16:33:32 PST
Newsgroups: alt.comp.periphs.scanner,comp.periphs.scanners,fj.comp.dev.scanner

Reply to Parent Message