🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: alt.comp.periphs.scanner
Article #35

Re: scanners: Canon FB610, UMAX 1220P, which one is better?

#35
From: daniel
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 1998 00:00
7 lines
1504 bytes
I bought the Microtek Scanmaker E3 and it has been the easiest part of my PC
to install and maintain (its also parallel). It comes with some pretty good
software like Kai's Photo Soap. I bought mine about 6 monthes ago for about
$350 and it's well worth the money.

-Daniel.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <906898356.794347@slave.tac.com.au>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <6tj8fm$mdd$1@news.iinet.net.au> <01bde09d$96277ee0$64646464@amd> <3606F280.14B9@senet.com.au>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10d683,12a2bdb5e8fad2e9
X-Google-Attributes: gid10d683,public
X-Google-Thread: 10e07b,12a2bdb5e8fad2e9
X-Google-Attributes: gid10e07b,public
X-Google-Thread: f4db5,12a2bdb5e8fad2e9
X-Google-Attributes: gidf4db5,public
X-Google-Thread: 104579,12a2bdb5e8fad2e9
X-Google-Attributes: gid104579,public
X-Google-Thread: 109e38,12a2bdb5e8fad2e9
X-Google-Attributes: gid109e38,public
From: "daniel" <kelly@tac.com.au>
Subject: Re: scanners: Canon FB610, UMAX 1220P, which one is better?
Date: 1998/09/27
Message-ID: <906898356.794347@slave.tac.com.au>
X-Deja-AN: 395296757
Cache-Post-Path: slave.tac.com.au!unknown@diale72.gos.tac.com.au
References: <6tj8fm$mdd$1@news.iinet.net.au> <01bde09d$96277ee0$64646464@amd> <3606F280.14B9@senet.com.au>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0
X-Trace: news.mel.aone.net.au 906898311 15230 203.102.210.3 (27 Sep 1998 12:11:51 GMT)
Organization: Terry Anthony Computers
X-Cache: nntpcache 2.3.2.1 (see http://www.nntpcache.org/)
NNTP-Posting-Date: 27 Sep 1998 12:11:51 GMT
Newsgroups: alt.comp.periphs.scanner,aus.computers.ibm-pc,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.misc,hk.comp.pc,tw.bbs.comp.hardware