Article View: alt.comp.periphs.scanner
Article #94Re: ICOM R10
From: Gary Fiber
Date: Sat, 08 Nov 1997 00:00
Date: Sat, 08 Nov 1997 00:00
67 lines
3071 bytes
3071 bytes
On Sat, 08 Nov 1997 16:16:15 +1100, kenno <kenno@mira.net> wrote: >Greg Hains wrote: > >> Hi. >> >> I have just purchased an ICOM R10 receiver. I also >> purchased a CT-17 >> level converter - a black box designed to control it. I >> bought it under >> the impression that I could program memories (etc) from my >> PC - easily - >> not so. There are other tools to do that, and I have >> ordered them. I >> have decided to pursue the CT-17 option, but only a >> command table comes >> with it. >> >> Does anybody out there have a sample program/application >> where they have >> used a CT-17 that they could send me? Icom say they don't >> supply them. >> >> While I'm at it, although Icom say that the CT-17 can talk >> to the R10, >> there is no device listed in the CT-17 table that it >> refers to. >> >> If anybody can provide any information in regards to these >> units, I would >> be most grateful. >> >> Greg Hains > >Hi Greg, > >Sorry to hear you bought a CT-17 when you really only needed >the RS-232 interface lead and the CS-R10 PC software. A few >customers have been talked into buying the CT-17. > >The CT-17 level convertor box is a multi port interface box >to allow connection of a variety equipments to a PC without >attention to accurately setting output levels. See page 74 >of R-10 manual. > >Perhaps you can return the CT-17 for refund or cradit. > >Regards > >Ken > > Ken, Better have another look at your post Attaching a direct RS-232 connection to either the Cloning port or the CI-V port of the R-10 will surely burn it up. The R-10 can only use TTL voltage levels 5 volts max. You appear to be suggesting it is ok to directly connect the R-10 to a computers serial port. The R-10 will not stand up to a direct RS-232 connection without a level converter. THIS REPLY DOES NOT REPRESENT ANY OFFICIAL POSITION of MY EMPLOYER. It represents only MY PERSONAL opinion. Copyright 1997 All Rights Reserved Gary
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3465052f.8862509@news.cmc.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<MPG.ec842255cee85e4989681@news.mtx.net.au> <3463F59F.93972304@mira.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fd5d6,d0071e7d99f08c0a X-Google-Attributes: gidfd5d6,public X-Google-Thread: 10e07b,d0071e7d99f08c0a X-Google-Attributes: gid10e07b,public X-Google-Thread: f5341,d0071e7d99f08c0a X-Google-Attributes: gidf5341,public X-Google-Thread: fa029,d0071e7d99f08c0a X-Google-Attributes: gidfa029,public X-Google-Thread: 1009ad,d0071e7d99f08c0a X-Google-Attributes: gid1009ad,public X-Google-Thread: f75de,d0071e7d99f08c0a X-Google-Attributes: gidf75de,public From: gfiber@news.cmc.net (Gary Fiber) Subject: Re: ICOM R10 Date: 1997/11/08 Message-ID: <3465052f.8862509@news.cmc.net> X-Deja-AN: 287829570 References: <MPG.ec842255cee85e4989681@news.mtx.net.au> <3463F59F.93972304@mira.net> X-Complaints-To: abuse@cmc.net X-Trace: news.cmc.net 878970349 4633 (None) 206.102.29.65 Organization: Chambers Multimedia Connection Reply-To: gfiber@news.cmc.net Newsgroups: alt.comp.periphs.scanner,alt.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner.uk,aus.radio.scanner,comp.periphs.scanners,rec.radio.scanner