🚀 go-pugleaf

This newsgroup is for image scanners that do graphics and optical character
recognition on a computer, not police/fire/aircraft radio scanners.

>Can anyone tell me the new freq's for Islington Police (NI)
>Many thanks
>
>
>

aparently you havent looked at the title of the news group....radio
scanner....mmmm

looks like police scanners to me....

what does everyone else think


Gil

Apparently the original *poster* crossposted to a few groups at once.
One of them being a computer image scanner group.  When the person
replied to him telling him the image scanner group was not a radio
group, it also cross posted to all the radio group as well.  Now you
cross posted back to the image scanner group as well.

The original poster should learn a little about proper usenet etiqutte
and not cross post for exactly this reason.  Hopefully this cross post
answer will keep all further flames to a minimum and kill this thread
in all the radio and image scanner groups the original moron er..I
mean poster posted to.

Gilbert Van Norman wrote:

>aparently you havent looked at the title of the news group....radio
>scanner....mmmm
>
>looks like police scanners to me....
>
>what does everyone else think
>
>
>Gil
>


@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
Check out my web page at:
http://www.Geocities.com/SiliconValley/Haven/6446

Paul Rixon <paul@rixon32.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in article
<708amp$tcg$1@newsreader1.core.theplanet.net>...
> Can anyone tell me the new freq's for Islington Police (NI)
> Many thanks
> 
> 
> if you mean Newcastle area islington its 486.975   469.275   enjoy
> 

I think you have attitude problem. Frequencies are a large part ofthis
newsgroup. The newsgroup is pretty much for ANYTHING scanner related.

That's what I think ...

Mike




Gilbert Van Norman wrote:
> 
> aparently you havent looked at the title of the news group....radio
> scanner....mmmm
> 
> looks like police scanners to me....
> 
> what does everyone else think
> 
> Gil

Aparently, I made a mental error by not checking to see what groups I
was posting on and I apologize for that....now hopefully this will end
this thread....

Gil

In article <3627B917.FDFC67DF@redsuspenders.com>, Gilbert Van Norman
<gilbert@redsuspenders.com> writes
>aparently you havent looked at the title of the news group....radio
>scanner....mmmm
>
>looks like police scanners to me....
>
>what does everyone else think

I don't understand why you think the following are "police scanners":
        alt.comp.periphs.scanner,
        comp.periphs.scanners

I have both types of scanner connected to my PC. I also baffled that the
original poster asked for what must be very local information of readers
in UK, USA, Aus.
-- 
Ian Walker                     G8ILZ               on packet as G8ILZ

I have an IQ of 6 million,  |  How will it end?  | Mostly       | Out of cheese
or was it 6?                |  In fire.          | harmless     | error

Apparently the original *poster* crossposted to a few groups at once.
One of them being a computer image scanner group.  When the person
replied to him telling him the image scanner group was not a radio
group, it also cross posted to all the radio group as well.  Now you
cross posted back to the image scanner group as well.

The original poster should learn a little about proper usenet etiqutte
and not cross post for exactly this reason.  Hopefully this cross post
answer will keep all further flames to a minimum and kill this thread
in all the radio and image scanner groups the original moron er..I
mean poster posted to.

Gilbert Van Norman wrote:

>aparently you havent looked at the title of the news group....radio
>scanner....mmmm
>
>looks like police scanners to me....
>
>what does everyone else think
>
>
>Gil
>


@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
Check out my web page at:
http://www.Geocities.com/SiliconValley/Haven/6446

Gilbert Van Norman wrote in message <3628006F.1CA84B17@redsuspenders.com>...
>Aparently, I made a mental error by not checking to see what groups I
>was posting on and I apologize for that....now hopefully this will end
>this thread....
>
>Gil
>

I DONT THINK THIS THREAD WILL EVER END THE WAY ITS GOING

J.halls wrote in message <908609600.72669@bell.dialix.com.au>...
>
>Gilbert Van Norman wrote in message
<3628006F.1CA84B17@redsuspenders.com>...
>>Aparently, I made a mental error by not checking to see what groups I
>>was posting on and I apologize for that....now hopefully this will end
>>this thread....
>>
>>Gil
>>
>
>I DONT THINK THIS THREAD WILL EVER END THE WAY ITS GOING
>
Lets just keep it going until New years and we will end it for New Years
eve!!

, "J.halls" <halls@bell.dialix.com.au> wrote:


> I DONT THINK THIS THREAD WILL EVER END THE WAY ITS GOING

Just how long is a thread, anyway?

-- 
-------------------------------------

Remove clothing to reply, thanks

On Fri, 16 Oct 1998 21:34:02 +0100, "Paul Rixon"
<paul@rixon32.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:

>Can anyone tell me the new freq's for Islington Police (NI)
>Many thanks
>


They have migrated to a UHF trunked scheme which virtually covers all
3 Mhz of 450.000 to 452.9875 - which is difficult to decode because
every time a user dekeys his mic the conversation moves to another
frequency.

There are some "trunk-track" scanners and decoders that originate from
the US, but they are as useful as chocolate teapots 'cause you need to
write the channel tables for use here.  And without prior knowledge of
this info you can't use them to track anything.

Duncan
E17

In article <3627B917.FDFC67DF@redsuspenders.com>, Gilbert Van Norman <gilbert@redsuspenders.com> wrote:
>aparently you havent looked at the title of the news group....radio
>scanner....mmmm
>looks like police scanners to me....
>what does everyone else think
>Gil

Apparently you haven't looked at the list of newsgroups that the original 
poster sent the message to.... comp.periphs.scanners.. mmmmm looks like image 
scanners to me.  What does everyone else think?

Next time, use your head before being a smartass, Gil.

Erik Harris        http://w3.to/erik/       esh7@c_rnell.edu
ICQ: 2610172                   ftp://esh7.resnet.cornell.edu
Chinese Martial Arts Assoc. @ Cornell:   http://w3.to/CMAAC/

To avoid unsolicited mail, my address at the top is INCORRECT.
Change the underscore to an "o".

What's an Islington?

I have posted my apology for this thread and would again like to
reiterate that I made a mistake and should have looked at what other
groups that the original poster posted.....well but there are some
people like erik harris who wants to be a smartass and keep this thread
going....but I would like to see it end...

thanks

gilbert

Em and Don wrote in message <70b6mg$on$1@sparky.wolfe.net>...
>What's an Islington?
>
Two thousand pounds.  Unless, of course, they've gone metric--then it's 2205
pounds.

What's an Aldershot?

In article <70cft8$127$1@excalibur.flash.net>, carlos
<URL:mailto:carlosk@flash.net> wrote:
> 
> Em and Don wrote in message <70b6mg$on$1@sparky.wolfe.net>...
> >What's an Islington?
> >
> Two thousand pounds.  Unless, of course, they've gone metric--then it's 2205
> pounds.
> 
> What's an Aldershot?
> 
Do you want the full list?

-- 
Emyr Williams, emyr@aberporth.demon.co.uk,

>I doubt it, anyway...maybe we made some new friends with optical
>scanners... :)
>
 Why not Optical Police scanners??

Whilst following a thread long overdue for death, I discovered a posting
that Jack wrote:

> > Why not Optical Police scanners??
> 
> Like binoculars?

Now THAT is the best post this thread has produced IMHO. 

If all the BS associated with an irrelevant thread crossposted to an
inappropriate Oz ng must be endured, at least we ought to be able to
larf at something clever :)

Good'un, Jack !  You made following this tortuous, longwinded saga
worthwhile. Thanks.

Rgds,

Steve
-- 
Steve Small
E-Mail : ssmall@ozemail.com.au
E-Mail : ssmall@interact.net.au
http://users.interact.net.au/~pssm

Jack wrote in message <36318ee3.509854042@news.bell.net>...
>On Thu, 22 Oct 1998 06:14:12 +1000, Steve Small
><ssmall@interact.net.au> wrote:
>
>Haha, I had forgot how this thread even started..I had a good laugh
>rereading it!
>
 Yes, this thred is too much fun, lets keep it going!! lol Maybe we should
make it a new years resolution to end this thred!! Or possibly we could even
just make a new news group : comp.radio.scanner.IslingtonPolice??