🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Thread View: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.ati
6 messages
6 total messages Started by Greg G Wed, 28 May 2003 11:25
9000Pro or 9200?
#26
Author: Greg G
Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 11:25
8 lines
1608 bytes
I'm looking for a low-end graphics card and have basically narrowed it down
to either a Radeon 9000 Pro or the newer 9200 (non-pro). The 9200 is only
$20 more ($150 vs $130 Australian) but doesn't look a whole lot different.
I'm not even sure if it has dual monitor support like the 9000 pro. Can
anyone give me an opinion on which is better, and where I might find any
reviews or information on the 9200.

TIA.
Re: 9000Pro or 9200?
#22
Author: Stephen Hardy
Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 20:58
32 lines
2410 bytes
8500 best

9000 not so good
9100 a little better, can OC to 8500 speed
9200 is just an agp8 ver of the 9000 with 9100 core

all play games at 1024*712 just fine but No higher

9500/pro is a better bet at a little over 300 for speed/$

get an ti4200 for as little as $250 new, less s/h!  kicks 9XXX ass!

IMO
"Greg G" <gregg@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
news:3ed49cba$0$31523$5a62ac22@freenews.iinet.net.au...
> I'm looking for a low-end graphics card and have basically narrowed it
down
> to either a Radeon 9000 Pro or the newer 9200 (non-pro). The 9200 is only
> $20 more ($150 vs $130 Australian) but doesn't look a whole lot different.
> I'm not even sure if it has dual monitor support like the 9000 pro. Can
> anyone give me an opinion on which is better, and where I might find any
> reviews or information on the 9200.
>
> TIA.
>
>


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.483 / Virus Database: 279 - Release Date: 5/19/2003
Re: 9000Pro or 9200?
#23
Author: Todd Howard
Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 23:24
8 lines
1505 bytes
Not a 9500 Pro it wont......
TH

>
> get an ti4200 for as little as $250 new, less s/h!  kicks 9XXX ass!
>
> IMO
>
Re: 9000Pro or 9200?
#24
Author: Stephen Hardy
Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 02:25
32 lines
2410 bytes
8500 best

9000 not so good
9100 a little better, can OC to 8500 speed
9200 is just an agp8 ver of the 9000 with 9100 core

all play games at 1024*712 just fine but No higher

9500/pro is a better bet at a little over 300 for speed/$

get an ti4200 for as little as $250 new, less s/h!  kicks 9XXX ass!

IMO
"Greg G" <gregg@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
news:3ed49cba$0$31523$5a62ac22@freenews.iinet.net.au...
> I'm looking for a low-end graphics card and have basically narrowed it
down
> to either a Radeon 9000 Pro or the newer 9200 (non-pro). The 9200 is only
> $20 more ($150 vs $130 Australian) but doesn't look a whole lot different.
> I'm not even sure if it has dual monitor support like the 9000 pro. Can
> anyone give me an opinion on which is better, and where I might find any
> reviews or information on the 9200.
>
> TIA.
>
>


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.483 / Virus Database: 279 - Release Date: 5/19/2003
Re: 9000Pro or 9200?
#25
Author: Andy Cunningham
Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 11:16
28 lines
2366 bytes
Not sure I agree with Stephen here

8500 - Good
9000 - Not so good
9000 Pro - Better than the 9000
9100 - same as 8500
9200 - same as 9000 but with 8x AGP
9200 Pro - 9000 Pro 8x

Both Pros run at 275/550 GPU/RAM, while the non-Pros run 250/400 MHz.  So
definitely get the 9000 Pro out of the options you gave.  However, the best
bet is the 9100 which is a rebranding of the 8500, but exactly the same
core.  This card for some reason seems to be cheaper - �50 here in the UK,
but is slightly faster in most cases than the 9000 Pro.

"Greg G" <gregg@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
news:3ed49cba$0$31523$5a62ac22@freenews.iinet.net.au...
> I'm looking for a low-end graphics card and have basically narrowed it
down
> to either a Radeon 9000 Pro or the newer 9200 (non-pro). The 9200 is only
> $20 more ($150 vs $130 Australian) but doesn't look a whole lot different.
> I'm not even sure if it has dual monitor support like the 9000 pro. Can
> anyone give me an opinion on which is better, and where I might find any
> reviews or information on the 9200.
>
> TIA.
>
>
Re: 9000Pro or 9200?
#21
Author: Stephen Hardy
Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 08:14
32 lines
2538 bytes
8500 best

9000 not so good
9100 a little better, can OC to 8500 speed
9200 is just an agp8 ver of the 9000 with 9100 core

all play games at 1024*712 just fine but No higher

9500/pro is a better bet at a little over 300 for speed/$

get an ti4200 for as little as $250 new, less s/h!  kicks 9XXX ass!

IMO
"Greg G" <gregg@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
news:3ed49cba$0$31523$5a62ac22@freenews.iinet.net.au...
> I'm looking for a low-end graphics card and have basically narrowed it
down
> to either a Radeon 9000 Pro or the newer 9200 (non-pro). The 9200 is only
> $20 more ($150 vs $130 Australian) but doesn't look a whole lot different.
> I'm not even sure if it has dual monitor support like the 9000 pro. Can
> anyone give me an opinion on which is better, and where I might find any
> reviews or information on the 9200.
>
> TIA.
>
>


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.483 / Virus Database: 279 - Release Date: 5/19/2003
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads