🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.matrox
Article #26

Re: Why (NOT) Win2k for gaming ?

#26
From: YeungLui
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 04:42
51 lines
3120 bytes
yyyyyyyyooooooooooooooooohhhhhhhhhhhhooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!!!!
WAKE UP!!!!!!! pal!!!

AMD no matter which flavour
will get FLIED! instantaneously in a 370 socket!, that is even if you 
get it to Squezze in!

man, Get the FACTs before you start talking at all., what a buch of BS

Mark Borton wrote:

> "Richard Walker" <richard.3.walker@bt.com> wrote in message
> news:8up48d$goo$1@pheidippides.axion.bt.co.uk...
> 
>> "Mark Borton" <MarkBorton@DEEPSPACENINE.COM> wrote in message
>> news:974120262.409.0.nnrp-02.c1ed3851@news.demon.co.uk...
>> 
>>> Win2k , if your not buying shoddy clone OEM hardware is the best OS for
>>> gaming...Get yourself an Nvida Graphics card, Creative labs sound card
>> 
> and
> 
>>> DVD decoder, a Hayes V90 "HARDWARE" modem, a couple of TRUE INTEL
>> 
> Processors
> 
>>> , a Gigabyte Dual Processor Board and a Netgear network adapter if your
>>> networking (the TX310 is good) and youll never look back
>> 
>> I agree 100%, except about the 'true Intel' bit.
>> 
>> Why not AMD?  I have a Thunderbird 800 games machine running 2k,
>> and it's great!
>> 
>> 
> 
> Then your in the minority, everyone i know with AMD systems jumped straghit
> back to intel systems after nothing but agro....
> 
> However i am about to build a new gaming rig, and i was thinking of using
> (if they exisit) a Socket 370 AMD chip (Around 800mhz) on a Slocket..to see
> if it works
> 
> 
>> --
>> Cheers,
>> Richard (speaking personally).
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
Technical Details
Message-ID: <3A10C2B0.6010203@Email.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!isdnet!howland.erols.net!newshub2.home.com!news.home.com!news2.rdc1.on.home.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
References: <8F0E6E9F3LondonCalling@164.128.36.42> <13joessvpjet7g4sc4a2ob3napvktcu3bj@4ax.com> <8F0EAFB6Agrinchhomecom@24.64.2.57> <8F0F680ADLondonCalling@164.128.36.42> <8F0FEC6ACgrinchhomecom@24.64.2.57> <974120262.409.0.nnrp-02.c1ed3851@news.demon.co.uk> <8up48d$goo$1@pheidippides.axion.bt.co.uk> <974137686.8565.0.nnrp-13.c1ed3851@news.demon.co.uk>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: feaeb,95c5e78d71aa7610
X-Google-Attributes: gidfeaeb,public
X-Google-Thread: fb51b,95c5e78d71aa7610
X-Google-Attributes: gidfb51b,public
X-Google-Thread: 10ec8c,95c5e78d71aa7610
X-Google-Attributes: gid10ec8c,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2000-11-13 20:42:26 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!isdnet!howland.erols.net!newshub2.home.com!news.home.com!news2.rdc1.on.home.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
Message-ID: <3A10C2B0.6010203@Email.com>
From: YeungLui <YeungLui@Email.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; m18) Gecko/20000929 Netscape6/6.0b3
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.matrox,3dfx.products.voodoo2,alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia
Subject: Re: Why (NOT) Win2k for gaming ?
References: <8F0E6E9F3LondonCalling@164.128.36.42> <13joessvpjet7g4sc4a2ob3napvktcu3bj@4ax.com> <8F0EAFB6Agrinchhomecom@24.64.2.57> <8F0F680ADLondonCalling@164.128.36.42> <8F0FEC6ACgrinchhomecom@24.64.2.57> <974120262.409.0.nnrp-02.c1ed3851@news.demon.co.uk> <8up48d$goo$1@pheidippides.axion.bt.co.uk> <974137686.8565.0.nnrp-13.c1ed3851@news.demon.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 52
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 04:42:24 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.69.144.26
X-Complaints-To: abuse@home.net
X-Trace: news2.rdc1.on.home.com 974176944 24.69.144.26 (Mon, 13 Nov 2000 20:42:24 PST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 20:42:24 PST
Organization: Excite@Home - The Leader in Broadband