Article View: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.matrox
Article #42Re: Why (NOT) Win2k for gaming ?
From: COMPUTER VILLAGE
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 00:00
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 00:00
100 lines
5480 bytes
5480 bytes
Hey Rick...I dont doubt that your expertise is somewhere out there, but R u gonna tell us that the POC that the Athlon chip offers is more stable than a solid Dual 600EB u gotta be smokin some good ass shi* ...anyways next time limit your responses to your Athlon partners...by the way I could take any Dual Athlon if it exists and smoke it with any PIII chip even lower in MHz...(remember that Windows is based on the Pentium architecture not the AMD -and the RISC instructions, one that by the way was not even in anyone's head at the time that P and W were making money out of us... ;-) Take that AMD kiddo RMS wrote: > Thanks for your opinion. Since I think you are totally wrong about virtually > everything, I'll let everybody know how it really works (IMNSHO). > > I have 3 systems, Athlon 800Mhz, PIII 550Mhz, and a K6-2 400Mhz (Enough of > that.). I have been actually working in computer maintenance/network admin > at a site that has 1200 clients for several years now (No MSCE, ABCD, or > anything else like that.). > > Facts: > 1) Dual processor systems are for systems that run multiple applications at > the same time, anything else is a waste of CPU processing power. (The > exception of course is high end servers with OS's that have real symetrical > processing, at the kernel level, like Solaris or IBM AIX. > 2) Win NT is a joke of an OS compared to any Unix OS (Just ask a real > administrator.) unless your main goal is to have everything automated and > "who cares about performance". > 3) Win NT is a joke of an OS compared to Win 98 for playing games (This may > be changing with Directx 8.0). > 4) Hayes modem - Not, > Netgear NIC - Not, > Intel PIII CPU - Not, > Creative DVD - Not ! > 5) USR modem - Yes, > 3Com NIC - Yes, > AMD Athlon CPU, - Yes > Pioneer DVD - Yes ! > > Maybe if you had purchased the right hardware instead of taking what came in > the pre-assembled "box", you would have been able to run Win98. Maybe if you > hadn't wasted your cash on the 2 Intel PIII 550's, you could have had a > totally stable Athlon 900Mhz for the same price. I understand that you > wasted your bucks on that SMP because you wanted to be the coolest guy > around, and now you have to use NT so it won't appear that your wasting your > SMP money, but just live with it. Just out of curiostity, how long did you > have the dual PIII system before you were told by a friend that Win98 does > not do SMP? > > Last note: If the best you can achieve is "crash less", you slouldn't be > throwing your opinions around. > > So long to another Wintel clone, Rick > > "Mark Borton" <MarkBorton@DEEPSPACENINE.COM> wrote in message > news:974120262.409.0.nnrp-02.c1ed3851@news.demon.co.uk... > > I have 4 systems > > > > a Dual PIII500 thats NEEDS win2000 to utilize its SMP capabilities...and > > this machine outshines my mates PIII800 at all but the really high end 3d > > benchmarks where it equals them (Both off us have Geforce 2 ultras, both > > using Detonator 3 drivers, mine win2k his win98SE) > > > > A PII350, and 2 P200MMX machines > > > > All the systems run faster, boot faster, crash less and are generally > nicer > > to work with now than undier 95/98....I have had no problems, no blue > > screens , and havent turned 1 system off since they were installed (my > > running time is now approching 3 months i think...possibly longer...can`t > > remember when i bought 2k) > > > > As a long time user of winxx right back to V3, and as both an NT4 and > win2k > > MCSE i can say that Win2k is the platform of choice for games and serious > > work....i wish "High" street computer sellers would relise the potentiol > of > > SMP systems, you can get a cheaper system of comparable performnce now > using > > SMP than you can buy a Ghz system that does the same thing.. > > > > Win2k , if your not buying shoddy clone OEM hardware is the best OS for > > gaming...Get yourself an Nvida Graphics card, Creative labs sound card and > > DVD decoder, a Hayes V90 "HARDWARE" modem, a couple of TRUE INTEL > Processors > > , a Gigabyte Dual Processor Board and a Netgear network adapter if your > > networking (the TX310 is good) and youll never look back > > > >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3A101FC5.18C8BA54@COMPUTER-VILLAGE.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<8F0E6E9F3LondonCalling@164.128.36.42> <13joessvpjet7g4sc4a2ob3napvktcu3bj@4ax.com> <8F0EAFB6Agrinchhomecom@24.64.2.57> <8F0F680ADLondonCalling@164.128.36.42> <8F0FEC6ACgrinchhomecom@24.64.2.57> <974120262.409.0.nnrp-02.c1ed3851@news.demon.co.uk> <oyTP5.37386$4U6.1886082@news1.rdc2.on.home.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10ec8c,95c5e78d71aa7610 X-Google-Attributes: gid10ec8c,public X-Google-Thread: feaeb,95c5e78d71aa7610 X-Google-Attributes: gidfeaeb,public X-Google-Thread: fb51b,95c5e78d71aa7610 X-Google-Attributes: gidfb51b,public From: COMPUTER VILLAGE <INFO@COMPUTER-VILLAGE.COM> Subject: Re: Why (NOT) Win2k for gaming ? Date: 2000/11/13 Message-ID: <3A101FC5.18C8BA54@COMPUTER-VILLAGE.COM> X-Deja-AN: 693129069 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <8F0E6E9F3LondonCalling@164.128.36.42> <13joessvpjet7g4sc4a2ob3napvktcu3bj@4ax.com> <8F0EAFB6Agrinchhomecom@24.64.2.57> <8F0F680ADLondonCalling@164.128.36.42> <8F0FEC6ACgrinchhomecom@24.64.2.57> <974120262.409.0.nnrp-02.c1ed3851@news.demon.co.uk> <oyTP5.37386$4U6.1886082@news1.rdc2.on.home.com> X-Accept-Language: en Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353" X-Trace: news2.mia 974135045 208.61.115.83 (Mon, 13 Nov 2000 12:04:05 EST) MIME-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 12:04:05 EST Newsgroups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.matrox,3dfx.products.voodoo2,alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia