🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.matrox
Article #42

Re: Why (NOT) Win2k for gaming ?

#42
From: COMPUTER VILLAGE
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 00:00
100 lines
5480 bytes
Hey Rick...I dont doubt that your expertise is somewhere out there, but R u
gonna tell us that the POC that the Athlon chip offers is more stable than a
solid Dual 600EB u gotta be smokin some good ass shi* ...anyways next time
limit your responses to your Athlon partners...by the way I could take any Dual
Athlon if it exists and smoke it with any PIII chip even lower in
MHz...(remember that Windows is based on the Pentium architecture not the AMD
-and the RISC instructions, one that by the way was not even in anyone's head
at the time that P and W were making money out of us...   ;-)







Take that AMD kiddo





RMS wrote:

> Thanks for your opinion. Since I think you are totally wrong about virtually
> everything, I'll let everybody know how it really works (IMNSHO).
>
> I have 3 systems, Athlon 800Mhz, PIII 550Mhz, and a K6-2 400Mhz (Enough of
> that.). I have been actually working in computer maintenance/network admin
> at a site that has 1200 clients for several years now (No MSCE,  ABCD, or
> anything else like that.).
>
> Facts:
> 1) Dual processor systems are for systems that run multiple applications at
> the same time, anything else is a waste of CPU processing power. (The
> exception of course is high end servers with OS's that have real symetrical
> processing, at the kernel level, like Solaris or IBM AIX.
> 2) Win NT is a joke of an OS compared to any Unix OS (Just ask a real
> administrator.) unless your main goal is to have everything automated and
> "who cares about performance".
> 3) Win NT is a joke of an OS compared to Win 98 for playing games (This may
> be changing with Directx 8.0).
> 4) Hayes modem - Not,
>  Netgear NIC - Not,
>  Intel PIII CPU - Not,
>  Creative DVD - Not !
> 5) USR modem - Yes,
>  3Com NIC - Yes,
>  AMD Athlon CPU, - Yes
>  Pioneer DVD - Yes !
>
> Maybe if you had purchased the right hardware instead of taking what came in
> the pre-assembled "box", you would have been able to run Win98. Maybe if you
> hadn't wasted your cash on the 2 Intel PIII 550's, you could have had a
> totally stable Athlon 900Mhz for the same price. I understand that you
> wasted your bucks on that SMP because you wanted to be the coolest guy
> around, and now you have to use NT so it won't appear that your wasting your
> SMP money, but just live with it. Just out of curiostity, how long did you
> have the dual PIII system before you were told by a friend that Win98 does
> not do SMP?
>
> Last note: If the best you can achieve is "crash less", you slouldn't be
> throwing your opinions around.
>
> So long to another Wintel clone, Rick
>
> "Mark Borton" <MarkBorton@DEEPSPACENINE.COM> wrote in message
> news:974120262.409.0.nnrp-02.c1ed3851@news.demon.co.uk...
> > I have 4 systems
> >
> > a Dual PIII500 thats NEEDS win2000 to utilize its SMP capabilities...and
> > this machine outshines my mates PIII800 at all but the really high end 3d
> > benchmarks where it equals them (Both off us have Geforce 2 ultras, both
> > using Detonator 3 drivers, mine win2k his win98SE)
> >
> > A PII350, and 2 P200MMX machines
> >
> > All the systems run faster, boot faster, crash less and are generally
> nicer
> > to work with now than undier 95/98....I have had no problems, no blue
> > screens , and havent turned 1 system off since they were installed (my
> > running time is now approching 3 months i think...possibly longer...can`t
> > remember when i bought 2k)
> >
> > As a long time user of winxx right back to V3, and as both an NT4 and
> win2k
> > MCSE i can say that Win2k is the platform of choice for games and serious
> > work....i wish "High" street computer sellers would relise the potentiol
> of
> > SMP systems, you can get a cheaper system of comparable performnce now
> using
> > SMP than you can buy a Ghz system that does the same thing..
> >
> > Win2k , if your not buying shoddy clone OEM hardware is the best OS for
> > gaming...Get yourself an Nvida Graphics card, Creative labs sound card and
> > DVD decoder, a Hayes V90 "HARDWARE" modem, a couple of TRUE INTEL
> Processors
> > , a Gigabyte Dual Processor Board and a Netgear network adapter if your
> > networking (the TX310 is good) and youll never look back
> >
> >
Technical Details
Message-ID: <3A101FC5.18C8BA54@COMPUTER-VILLAGE.COM>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <8F0E6E9F3LondonCalling@164.128.36.42> <13joessvpjet7g4sc4a2ob3napvktcu3bj@4ax.com> <8F0EAFB6Agrinchhomecom@24.64.2.57> <8F0F680ADLondonCalling@164.128.36.42> <8F0FEC6ACgrinchhomecom@24.64.2.57> <974120262.409.0.nnrp-02.c1ed3851@news.demon.co.uk> <oyTP5.37386$4U6.1886082@news1.rdc2.on.home.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10ec8c,95c5e78d71aa7610
X-Google-Attributes: gid10ec8c,public
X-Google-Thread: feaeb,95c5e78d71aa7610
X-Google-Attributes: gidfeaeb,public
X-Google-Thread: fb51b,95c5e78d71aa7610
X-Google-Attributes: gidfb51b,public
From: COMPUTER VILLAGE <INFO@COMPUTER-VILLAGE.COM>
Subject: Re: Why (NOT) Win2k for gaming ?
Date: 2000/11/13
Message-ID: <3A101FC5.18C8BA54@COMPUTER-VILLAGE.COM>
X-Deja-AN: 693129069
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <8F0E6E9F3LondonCalling@164.128.36.42> <13joessvpjet7g4sc4a2ob3napvktcu3bj@4ax.com> <8F0EAFB6Agrinchhomecom@24.64.2.57> <8F0F680ADLondonCalling@164.128.36.42> <8F0FEC6ACgrinchhomecom@24.64.2.57> <974120262.409.0.nnrp-02.c1ed3851@news.demon.co.uk> <oyTP5.37386$4U6.1886082@news1.rdc2.on.home.com>
X-Accept-Language: en
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353"
X-Trace: news2.mia 974135045 208.61.115.83 (Mon, 13 Nov 2000 12:04:05 EST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 12:04:05 EST
Newsgroups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.matrox,3dfx.products.voodoo2,alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia