Article View: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.matrox
Article #44Re: Why (NOT) Win2k for gaming ?
From: Mark Borton
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 00:00
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 00:00
96 lines
4907 bytes
4907 bytes
"RMS" <rsavoie1@Kiss.my.grits.spammer.home.com> wrote in message news:oyTP5.37386$4U6.1886082@news1.rdc2.on.home.com... > Thanks for your opinion. Since I think you are totally wrong about virtually > everything, I'll let everybody know how it really works (IMNSHO). > > I have 3 systems, Athlon 800Mhz, PIII 550Mhz, and a K6-2 400Mhz (Enough of > that.). I have been actually working in computer maintenance/network admin > at a site that has 1200 clients for several years now (No MSCE, ABCD, or > anything else like that.). > > Facts: > 1) Dual processor systems are for systems that run multiple applications at > the same time, anything else is a waste of CPU processing power. (The > exception of course is high end servers with OS's that have real symetrical > processing, at the kernel level, like Solaris or IBM AIX. > 2) Win NT is a joke of an OS compared to any Unix OS (Just ask a real > administrator.) unless your main goal is to have everything automated and > "who cares about performance". > 3) Win NT is a joke of an OS compared to Win 98 for playing games (This may > be changing with Directx 8.0). > 4) Hayes modem - Not, > Netgear NIC - Not, > Intel PIII CPU - Not, Hmm, let me see, what would i rather have, a motherboard with 2 PIII intel chips, stablilty and the use of A geforce 2 ultra with no agro, or a slightly faster chip with all the hassle of shitty no support motherboards and incompatibilities with the Geforce chipsset > Creative DVD - Not ! Creative make the best in PC hardware decoders ive ever seen, no loss of picture quality from interference, crisp, clear quality, and the Optical DTS 5.1 output is a must > 5) USR modem - Yes, WHy? i didtched my USR for the Hayes, i get higher connection rates, less packet loss and far better all-round performance > 3Com NIC - Yes, Nope, Ill stick with netgear (Coz i get it free, Hubs and all) > AMD Athlon CPU, - Yes Instablilty and low support from Motherboard manufactuers, YES > Pioneer DVD - Yes ! Thats what i have, I SAID CREATIVE DVD DECODER...(REGION FREE, TV OUTPU, DTS 5.1 Optical OUTPUT) > > Maybe if you had purchased the right hardware instead of taking what came in > the pre-assembled "box", you would have been able to run Win98. Maybe if you > hadn't wasted your cash on the 2 Intel PIII 550's, you could have had a > totally stable Athlon 900Mhz for the same price. I understand that you > wasted your bucks on that SMP because you wanted to be the coolest guy > around, and now you have to use NT so it won't appear that your wasting your > SMP money, but just live with it. Just out of curiostity, how long did you > have the dual PIII system before you were told by a friend that Win98 does > not do SMP? > > Last note: If the best you can achieve is "crash less", you slouldn't be > throwing your opinions around. > > So long to another Wintel clone, Rick I Built all my systems myself, and I built the Dual system specifiacally for NT4.0...win2k just let me move from playing games on the single cpu system to using a far suppirior SMP system Quake 3 Arena, on my Dual PIII timedemos 1 at a higher result than my freind Atahlon @800....and he has had a shitty time getting the geforce 2 to run stabaly under win9x SMP rules, INTEL though not the fastest by the long way, are far better than AMD in the long run..until I can get a stable AMD supported motherboard (Or find a Socket 370 AMD chip that i can get into a Slocket and fit to my Gigabyte 6BXD I wont even be looking at another processor manufacturor..... i have never had 1 crash (Except the Adaptec, where have my CDs gone now bug) under win2k
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<974137281.8432.0.nnrp-13.c1ed3851@news.demon.co.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<8F0E6E9F3LondonCalling@164.128.36.42> <13joessvpjet7g4sc4a2ob3napvktcu3bj@4ax.com> <8F0EAFB6Agrinchhomecom@24.64.2.57> <8F0F680ADLondonCalling@164.128.36.42> <8F0FEC6ACgrinchhomecom@24.64.2.57> <974120262.409.0.nnrp-02.c1ed3851@news.demon.co.uk> <oyTP5.37386$4U6.1886082@news1.rdc2.on.home.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10ec8c,95c5e78d71aa7610 X-Google-Attributes: gid10ec8c,public X-Google-Thread: fb51b,95c5e78d71aa7610 X-Google-Attributes: gidfb51b,public X-Google-Thread: feaeb,95c5e78d71aa7610 X-Google-Attributes: gidfeaeb,public From: "Mark Borton" <MarkBorton@DEEPSPACENINE.COM> Subject: Re: Why (NOT) Win2k for gaming ? Date: 2000/11/13 Message-ID: <974137281.8432.0.nnrp-13.c1ed3851@news.demon.co.uk> X-Deja-AN: 693142558 X-NNTP-Posting-Host: a-2-s.demon.co.uk:193.237.56.81 References: <8F0E6E9F3LondonCalling@164.128.36.42> <13joessvpjet7g4sc4a2ob3napvktcu3bj@4ax.com> <8F0EAFB6Agrinchhomecom@24.64.2.57> <8F0F680ADLondonCalling@164.128.36.42> <8F0FEC6ACgrinchhomecom@24.64.2.57> <974120262.409.0.nnrp-02.c1ed3851@news.demon.co.uk> <oyTP5.37386$4U6.1886082@news1.rdc2.on.home.com> X-Priority: 3 X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 974137281 nnrp-13:8432 NO-IDENT a-2-s.demon.co.uk:193.237.56.81 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Newsgroups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.matrox,3dfx.products.voodoo2,alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia