🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.matrox
Article #44

Re: Why (NOT) Win2k for gaming ?

#44
From: Mark Borton
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 00:00
96 lines
4907 bytes
"RMS" <rsavoie1@Kiss.my.grits.spammer.home.com> wrote in message
news:oyTP5.37386$4U6.1886082@news1.rdc2.on.home.com...
> Thanks for your opinion. Since I think you are totally wrong about
virtually
> everything, I'll let everybody know how it really works (IMNSHO).
>
> I have 3 systems, Athlon 800Mhz, PIII 550Mhz, and a K6-2 400Mhz (Enough of
> that.). I have been actually working in computer maintenance/network admin
> at a site that has 1200 clients for several years now (No MSCE,  ABCD, or
> anything else like that.).
>
> Facts:
> 1) Dual processor systems are for systems that run multiple applications
at
> the same time, anything else is a waste of CPU processing power. (The
> exception of course is high end servers with OS's that have real
symetrical
> processing, at the kernel level, like Solaris or IBM AIX.
> 2) Win NT is a joke of an OS compared to any Unix OS (Just ask a real
> administrator.) unless your main goal is to have everything automated and
> "who cares about performance".
> 3) Win NT is a joke of an OS compared to Win 98 for playing games (This
may
> be changing with Directx 8.0).
> 4) Hayes modem - Not,
>  Netgear NIC - Not,
>  Intel PIII CPU - Not,

Hmm, let me see, what would i rather have, a motherboard with 2 PIII intel
chips, stablilty and the use of A geforce 2 ultra with no agro, or a
slightly faster chip with all the hassle of shitty no support motherboards
and incompatibilities with the Geforce chipsset

>  Creative DVD - Not !

Creative make the best in PC hardware decoders ive ever seen, no loss of
picture quality from interference, crisp, clear quality, and the Optical DTS
5.1 output is a must

> 5) USR modem - Yes,

WHy? i didtched my USR for the Hayes, i get higher connection rates, less
packet loss and far better all-round performance

>  3Com NIC - Yes,

Nope, Ill stick with netgear (Coz i get it free, Hubs and all)

>  AMD Athlon CPU, - Yes

Instablilty and low support from Motherboard manufactuers, YES

>  Pioneer DVD - Yes !

Thats what i have, I SAID CREATIVE DVD DECODER...(REGION FREE, TV OUTPU, DTS
5.1 Optical OUTPUT)

>
> Maybe if you had purchased the right hardware instead of taking what came
in
> the pre-assembled "box", you would have been able to run Win98. Maybe if
you
> hadn't wasted your cash on the 2 Intel PIII 550's, you could have had a
> totally stable Athlon 900Mhz for the same price. I understand that you
> wasted your bucks on that SMP because you wanted to be the coolest guy
> around, and now you have to use NT so it won't appear that your wasting
your
> SMP money, but just live with it. Just out of curiostity, how long did you
> have the dual PIII system before you were told by a friend that Win98 does
> not do SMP?
>
> Last note: If the best you can achieve is "crash less", you slouldn't be
> throwing your opinions around.
>
> So long to another Wintel clone, Rick





I Built all my systems myself, and I built the Dual system specifiacally for
NT4.0...win2k just let me move from playing games on the single cpu system
to using a far suppirior SMP system

Quake 3 Arena, on my Dual PIII timedemos 1 at a higher result than my freind
Atahlon @800....and he has had a shitty time getting the geforce 2 to run
stabaly under win9x

SMP rules, INTEL though not the fastest by the long way, are far better than
AMD in the long run..until I can get a stable AMD supported motherboard (Or
find a Socket 370 AMD chip that i can get into a Slocket and fit to my
Gigabyte 6BXD I wont even be looking at another processor manufacturor.....

i have never had 1 crash (Except the Adaptec, where have my CDs gone now
bug) under win2k
Technical Details
Message-ID: <974137281.8432.0.nnrp-13.c1ed3851@news.demon.co.uk>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <8F0E6E9F3LondonCalling@164.128.36.42> <13joessvpjet7g4sc4a2ob3napvktcu3bj@4ax.com> <8F0EAFB6Agrinchhomecom@24.64.2.57> <8F0F680ADLondonCalling@164.128.36.42> <8F0FEC6ACgrinchhomecom@24.64.2.57> <974120262.409.0.nnrp-02.c1ed3851@news.demon.co.uk> <oyTP5.37386$4U6.1886082@news1.rdc2.on.home.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10ec8c,95c5e78d71aa7610
X-Google-Attributes: gid10ec8c,public
X-Google-Thread: fb51b,95c5e78d71aa7610
X-Google-Attributes: gidfb51b,public
X-Google-Thread: feaeb,95c5e78d71aa7610
X-Google-Attributes: gidfeaeb,public
From: "Mark Borton" <MarkBorton@DEEPSPACENINE.COM>
Subject: Re: Why (NOT) Win2k for gaming ?
Date: 2000/11/13
Message-ID: <974137281.8432.0.nnrp-13.c1ed3851@news.demon.co.uk>
X-Deja-AN: 693142558
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: a-2-s.demon.co.uk:193.237.56.81
References: <8F0E6E9F3LondonCalling@164.128.36.42> <13joessvpjet7g4sc4a2ob3napvktcu3bj@4ax.com> <8F0EAFB6Agrinchhomecom@24.64.2.57> <8F0F680ADLondonCalling@164.128.36.42> <8F0FEC6ACgrinchhomecom@24.64.2.57> <974120262.409.0.nnrp-02.c1ed3851@news.demon.co.uk> <oyTP5.37386$4U6.1886082@news1.rdc2.on.home.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net
X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 974137281 nnrp-13:8432 NO-IDENT a-2-s.demon.co.uk:193.237.56.81
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Newsgroups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.matrox,3dfx.products.voodoo2,alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia