Re: G200 or Voodoo2?

Article View: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.matrox

Article #92

Back to alt.comp.periphs.videocards.matrox Previous Next

#92

From: TEG
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 1998 00:00

12 lines
1280 bytes

On Fri, 14 Aug 1998 17:08:59 -0400, Paul Dardinski <agent@erols.com>
wrote:

>    I have both a G200 and Voodoo2, there is absolutely NO comparison between
>these two cards. If you are serious about gaming, get the Voodoo2, if you think
>you MAY play a game or two once in a while, the G200 will suit you just fine.
>The G200 is a little better than a Voodoo1, but does not compare to Voodoo2 in
>terms of speed or picture quality, period.
>

I also have both cards.  However, from what I can see, the G200, while
slower than the V2, DOES have better image quality.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <35d6e0f7.14173435@news>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <35D3FE7D.543740A4@funk.org> <903118871.11901.0.nnrp-01.d4e4550d@news.demon.co.uk> <35D4A76B.7748F90E@erols.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10a47c,c813df2ce63778ae
X-Google-Attributes: gid10a47c,public
X-Google-Thread: fb51b,c813df2ce63778ae
X-Google-Attributes: gidfb51b,public
From: grady@home.com (TEG)
Subject: Re: G200 or Voodoo2?
Date: 1998/08/15
Message-ID: <35d6e0f7.14173435@news>
X-Deja-AN: 381476151
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <35D3FE7D.543740A4@funk.org> <903118871.11901.0.nnrp-01.d4e4550d@news.demon.co.uk> <35D4A76B.7748F90E@erols.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Organization: @Home Network
MIME-Version: 1.0
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 15 Aug 1998 12:26:42 PDT
Newsgroups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.matrox,3dfx.products

Reply to Parent Message