Article View: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia
Article #240Re: What specs to look for in a video card to run 22" monitor at high resolutions
From: RJT
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 21:16
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 21:16
46 lines
3564 bytes
3564 bytes
Steve Rossiter wrote: > Hi, > I'll be buying a 22" Mitsubishi Diamond Pro > http://www.necmitsubishi.com/products/home/ProductDetail.cfm?product_i > d=232&division=MITSUBISHI and am now looking a various cards to drive > this monstrosity. Mitsubishi specs say it can go to 2048 x 1536 @ 86 > and my job now is to match it to a card provide the signal. Although I > will probably have the screen set to 2048 x 1536 I figure if the card > can do this it will be able to provide viewing at lower resolutions > flicker free. That'd be my guess too =) > My needs are to provide clean displays of various large data sets in > 2D, sometimes rotate them in 3D and a little low-tech gaming like Age > of Empires, Sim City. I'm a little confused because cards advertised > with 64 MB, 128 MB, or now 256 MB of memory all claim to be able to > display at resolutions near to my 2048 x 1536 benchmark so there must > be more than aggregate memory that determines ability to run large > monitors at high resolutions. > > The Matrox P750 seems to a reliable choice for the job but lacks > some of the fun stuff of say the ATI AIW 9000 Pro or GeForce4 Ti 4600. > Will $150-$200 get me a reliable, flicker free card that can display > at high resolutions (that way I can see more of the data set) or am I > asking too much of a card in this price range? > One last question. What is the end result of setting the screen to a > resolution and refresh rate that the card doesn't list? Some drivers or tools let you define the refresh for the card. I know Matrox provides a tool for that with their cards, or at least, they used to, so you can set it to whatever Hz you want, provided the card can handle it. > For example, > the monitor mentioned above lists a capability to display 1800 x 1440 > @ 92 Hz but the closest a Radeon 9800 Pro comes in terms of its spec > sheet is 1920x1080 @ 120. How would this display on the screen? Not, a black screen, and you might damage the monitor. I wouldn't try that. > Thanks for the help with these questions. If you want crisp clear and stunning 2D, Matrox is definately the way to go.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3F4E7128.1040007@tiscali.nl>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsgate.cistron.nl!news.cistron.nl!not-for-mailReferences:
<MPG.19b1d5d0ec36ba29989697@news.fullerton.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f4bb2,6d66726e3d358775 X-Google-Attributes: gidf4bb2,public X-Google-Thread: 10bac7,6d66726e3d358775 X-Google-Attributes: gid10bac7,public X-Google-Thread: feaeb,6d66726e3d358775 X-Google-Attributes: gidfeaeb,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-08-28 14:16:24 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsgate.cistron.nl!news.cistron.nl!not-for-mail From: RJT <spamsucks@tiscali.nl> Newsgroups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia,adobe.premiere.windows,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.video Subject: Re: What specs to look for in a video card to run 22" monitor at high resolutions Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 23:16:24 +0200 Organization: Cistron Lines: 47 Message-ID: <3F4E7128.1040007@tiscali.nl> References: <MPG.19b1d5d0ec36ba29989697@news.fullerton.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: cust.93.103.adsl.cistron.nl Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ncc1701.cistron.net 1062105384 5576 195.64.93.103 (28 Aug 2003 21:16:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@cistron.nl NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 21:16:24 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030208 Netscape/7.02 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en