Article View: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia
Article #349Re: OT:ATT ALL Nvidia Geforce 88xx Owners! Please test your cards for buzzing/sqealing with linked tools. Faulty cards/PSU's may...
From: Ceri Thomas
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 09:48
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 09:48
63 lines
5673 bytes
5673 bytes
Well to be honest I've installed them on roughly 10% of the machines I build. They all are loaded with Vista Ultimate and powered with an Enermax or Antec power supplies only with Gigabyte motherboards and I have yet to hear any such noise to date, or have a client call about it. These machines are usually in the $3000.00 mark and people do call over something or really anything out of the ordinary that happens. I would just have to say they are tricky cards as they are truly very power picky and smart about power monitoring. I have seen lots of posts but the world is filled with strange people doing odd things. Just because you get a famous brand name with 500watt on the side doesn't dictate the voltage will have a correct sign wave. The chief reason I use Antec or Enermax is because they only make power supplies and the best you can get at any price hands down for decades now. If your card is unstable or not operating well change the power supply and then change the motherboard. It will go. Most people don't know this but the motherboards must be able to handle clean power wave signs to, but most never say. People usually get a great video card and high power famous brand (usually a memory company builder not a power supply builder) and get fancy memory which really has fairly little effect in reality. Then find themselves cheapening out on a motherboard, like using the 50/50 crap shoot Asus ones or laughable MSI and wonder why they have issues. As these cards, CPUs, memory and other components speed up ever faster the power demand is higher and cleaner much cleaner due to physics having thinner wires running hotter with each generation, if not some will simply burn out causing all sorts of havoc as we've all heard the horror stories. Look at were we are at now. 1/2 to 1kw power supplies, up a long way from 350watts, yet the speed of the singular function being done before my finger leaves the key hasn't changed since my five year old machine that I use in my office. The power and speed is pointless on 99% of all applications even in this day and age. The lesson is... if you want to use high quality graphic cards EVERYTHING ELSE must be of high quality not simply high price or a catchy brand name. Corsair or OZ that make quality memory not power supplies, put one under an oscilloscope and see. Getting a 700.00 video card to only plug into a 130.00 motherboard really is just looking for trouble, just like a Ferrari using a Nissan engine and P7 tires with a 3 speed automatic, looks cool but won't sound or function well at all, unlike the real Ferrari. The 8800 series card is pointless really as less then 24 aplications (mostly games) able take any kind of noticable benifit. My 14 year old son has one in his, with no strange sounds oddly enough and runs games at high frame rates, but the 7950 GX2 in my workstation does them to at rates higher than the human eye can detect. I've told him it's the last card as they are close to the end as 5GHz area that cause metal in widths of nanometers destintgrates this is why they are using dual core and quad core to impress with not much success over the higher speed singular cores. A 600watt to 1kw computer running at home is insane in the hydro bill to say the least. "johns" <johns321@moscow.com> wrote in message news:1190400660.019862.14930@y27g2000pre.googlegroups.com... >I build about that myself, plus service 1200 users. > Those 8800s have problems more than just > power requirements. Sounds to me like they > need "faster" local on-card power ... something > like a whopping big electrolytic right by the > ICs on the card. And that won't work. I'm also > seeing driver problems with the one I tested. > Called nVidia, and they said they spent too > much time developing Vista drivers for that > card ... and need to go back and work on the > XP drivers. I'm seeing that the 7950 GT OC > is the top XP card. An 8800 can't touch one > for speed and stability. > > johns >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<Px5Ji.218101$fJ5.217013@pd7urf1no>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!pd7cy1no!pd7cy2no!shaw.ca!pd7urf1no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mailReferences:
<L5zIi.206296$fJ5.59339@pd7urf1no> <u1MIi.18670$A55.18249@pd7urf2no> <1190400660.019862.14930@y27g2000pre.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: feaeb,d8117a8d03c71ab1 X-Google-Thread: 10acac,d8117a8d03c71ab1 X-Google-Thread: 108f8e,d8117a8d03c71ab1 X-Google-Thread: 114911,d8117a8d03c71ab1 X-Google-Thread: fd646,d8117a8d03c71ab1 X-Google-Attributes: gidfeaeb,gid10acac,gid108f8e,gid114911,gidfd646,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!pd7cy1no!pd7cy2no!shaw.ca!pd7urf1no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 70.73.28.197 From: "Ceri Thomas" <ceri@shawRemoveThis.ca> Newsgroups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia,calgary.forsale,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.flight-sim,edm.forsale References: <L5zIi.206296$fJ5.59339@pd7urf1no> <u1MIi.18670$A55.18249@pd7urf2no> <1190400660.019862.14930@y27g2000pre.googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: OT:ATT ALL Nvidia Geforce 88xx Owners! Please test your cards for buzzing/sqealing with linked tools. Faulty cards/PSU's may be widespread. Lines: 65 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3138 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original Message-ID: <Px5Ji.218101$fJ5.217013@pd7urf1no> Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 09:48:31 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176 X-Complaints-To: abuse@shaw.ca X-Trace: pd7urf1no 1190454511 64.59.135.176 (Sat, 22 Sep 2007 03:48:31 MDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 03:48:31 MDT Organization: Shaw Residential Internet X-Original-Bytes: 5430