Excel vs. Access for laboratory data (Part 2)

Thread View: alt.comp.shareware.programmer

1 messages

[T] Back to Threads [V] Tree View [G] Group Articles

1 total messages Started by Franz M�ller Tue, 18 Nov 1997 00:00

#36

Author: Franz M�ller
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 1997 00:00

29 lines
1922 bytes

Hello again !

First, many thanks to the people who answered me, and now a try to
precisize my problem:

Do the laborartory data you know have other relations then 1 to 1 or are
there some redundant data which can be reduced by introducing a relation...
?
So, my problem is not which tool or programming language to use, not how to
*process* the data, but how to *represent* the data efficiently.

If you have some knowledge related to this problem, please share them with
me!
And: *Please* continue the discussion in only one group. I propose the
group
news:comp.programming

Have many thanks in advance !

--
Part 1 was:
Do you know some good reasons to put (chemical) *laboratory data* in a
relational database (Access or other, no matter) instead of Excel(-like)
sheets (which is usualy, as I heared) ? Then please tell me them. I must
write a programm to process this data and have to argument my choose.

-- 
mailto:ewald@iname.com

Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads