🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: alt.comp.software.financial.quickbooks
Article #2

Re: Discrepency in Summary vs Detail reports ...

#2
From: mblockNO_SPAM
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 02:38
58 lines
3078 bytes
On Sun, 18 Mar 2001 21:23:52 +0000 (UTC), scrappy@hub.org (Marc G.
Fournier) wrote:

>A lj Sigelman <alaninsd@san.rr.com> writes:
>
>>Does one happen to be cash basis and the other accrual?
>
>very good question ... but, I thought you setup the accounting method when you 
>setup the books themselves, so that it would be one or the other?
>
>any way of telling which it is?
>
Modify or Customize Report, according to the QB version.
QB2001 can label each report for this beneath the date.

>>"Marc G. Fournier" wrote:
>
>>> Morning ...
>>>
>>>         I'm playing around with the reports under QBPro 2000, and can't
>>> understand how two reports, one label'd detail and one label'd summary can
>>> produce two different numbers ...
>>>
>>>         I go to:
>>>
>>>         Customers
>>>                 -> Report
>>>                         -> Reports on All Customer Jobs
>>>                                 -> Sales
>>>                                         -> Summary
>>>                                         -> Detail
>>>
>>>         Summary gives different results then Detail, for the same date
>>> ranges:
>>>
>>>         March 1st -> March 5th - (S)  823.63 (D) 4352.96
>>>         February ............... (S) 6973.38 (D) 6540.41
>>>
>>>         So, why the discrepency?  Which one is right?  Is this just a bug in
>>> 2000?
>>>
>>> thanks ...
>>>
>>> --
>>> Marc G. Fournier                               scrappy@hub.org
>>> Systems Administrator @ hub.org
>>> scrappy@{postgresql|isc}.org                       ICQ#7615664

     Mike Block - Tax Cut CPA
 World's #1 QuickBooks Top Tester
    FREE  NetLedger accounting 
  FREE 462p QB books/error codes
100+ QB add-ons http://blocktax.com/
QB no-spam news: biz.comp.accounting
-----------------------------------
Spam bait admin@localhost abuse@localhost
 webmaster@localhost postmaster@127.0.0.1
 enforcement@sec.gov cyberfraud@nasaa.org
Technical Details
Message-ID: <3ab6711a.3378051@news.mindspring.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!supernews.google.com!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!cyclone2.usenetserver.com!news-out.usenetserver.com!newsfeed2.earthlink.net!newsfeed.earthlink.net!news.mindspring.net!not-for-mail
References: <981f8u$1s1t$1@news.tht.net> <3AA4452F.D48E7DFE@san.rr.com> <993918$hh6$1@news.tht.net>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 112670,ad4005728e053553
X-Google-Attributes: gid112670,public
X-Google-Thread: fbe20,37ff2a5ad21ffb2d,start
X-Google-Attributes: gidfbe20,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-03-18 18:44:09 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!supernews.google.com!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!cyclone2.usenetserver.com!news-out.usenetserver.com!newsfeed2.earthlink.net!newsfeed.earthlink.net!news.mindspring.net!not-for-mail
From: <mblockNO_SPAM@blocktax.com> (Mike Block - Tax Cut C.P.A.)
Newsgroups: alt.comp.software.financial.quickbooks,biz.comp.accounting
Subject: Re: Discrepency in Summary vs Detail reports ...
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 02:38:23 GMT
Organization: MindSpring Enterprises
Lines: 61
Approved: mblock@blocktax.com
Message-ID: <3ab6711a.3378051@news.mindspring.com>
References: <981f8u$1s1t$1@news.tht.net> <3AA4452F.D48E7DFE@san.rr.com> <993918$hh6$1@news.tht.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: d1.56.a8.8b
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Server-Date: 19 Mar 2001 02:41:12 GMT
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.452