🚀 go-pugleaf

On Fri, 2 Mar 2001 15:26:26 -0800, "T Bennett"
<todd_bennett@polyconcepts.com> wrote:

>So I take it that either there are no con's with Peachtree, nobody has ever
>tried Peachtree, or this newsgroup is meticulously monitored by Intuit, and
>they won't allow any competition.
>
>"T Bennett" <todd_bennett@polyconcepts.com> wrote in message
>news:t9tkd7arf3qlb4@corp.supernews.com...
>> Anyone done any research?  What are Peachtree's cons?

I wanted someone else to take a turn. PT is generally considered 
better than QB for inventory & for allowing data imports/exports 
and custom reports. QB will have similar or better data access
by January. 

The fundamental difference is that QB is designed to use forms,
to make it easy for non-accountants to use its powerful features. 
PT may be more powerful, if less flexible, but it is really better
for accountants and bookkeepers.

QB has 85% of the small business accounting program market once
dominated by QB. This may be because there are many more non-
accountants than accountants and bookkeepers.

     Mike Block - Tax Cut CPA
 World's #1 QuickBooks Top Tester
    FREE  NetLedger accounting 
  FREE 462p QB books/error codes
100+ QB add-ons http://blocktax.com/
QB no-spam news: biz.comp.accounting
-----------------------------------
Spam bait admin@localhost abuse@localhost
 webmaster@localhost postmaster@127.0.0.1
 enforcement@sec.gov cyberfraud@nasaa.org