Article View: alt.comp.software.financial.quickbooks
Article #74Re: QUICKBOOKS STANDARD OR QUICKEN H&B
From: mblockNO_SPAM
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 06:29
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 06:29
93 lines
4712 bytes
4712 bytes
I agree with everyone on QB over Quicken in this case, though I did
not see anyone mention memorized transactions. They let you make
an invoice for each owner once and memorize it. You can then record
all 60+ invoices for each later month with a few clicks. If Quicken cannot
do this then you also need to use QB for this reason.
On Sat, 10 Feb 2001 05:22:01 -0800, "Richard F. Thomas"
<rfthomas@pacbell.net> wrote:
>Allan & Michael,
>
>Thanks for your constructive responses.
>
>Allan, I agree with you about the the Cash vs. Accrual method. However, for
>some reason, the Association's CPA has us on a cash basis. Your point about
>the homeowners wanting to see Dues Receivable is the very reason that I want
>to establish the A/R as indicated. Even if it's only a memo entry in the
>financial statements. Based on Michael's response, it sounds like I can
>accomplish both, i.e., record on an accrual basis but report on a cash
>basis. I we in fact decide to bring this function in-house, I'll try to do
>that.
>
>Again thanks your responses.
>
>Richard
>
>"Richard F. Thomas" <rfthomas@pacbell.net> wrote in message
>news:WL4h6.78$Sf1.239446@news.pacbell.net...
>> I am a volunteer treasurer for our small homeowner's association (62
>units).
>> My duties consist of collecting and depositing all monthly assessments
>from
>> the homeowners and paying all bills. In addition, we currently use an
>> outside bookkeeping service which requires me to compile the above
>> information each month and send it to them for entry into a bookkeeping
>> system. It appears that they use Quicken Standard. We are considering
>> bringing this in-house. In addition to saving money, I really don't think
>> that it would take much extra time, on my part, since I could handle
>> everything simultaneously.
>>
>> My questions relate to whether to use Quicken Home & Business or
>QuickBooks
>> Standards. We do not have any employees and therefore do not need a
>payroll
>> capability.
>>
>> Even though we are on the cash accounting method, NOT the accrual method,
>I
>> want to set up A/R for each homeowner to track assessment payments,
>> delinquencies, late payments etc.
>>
>> 1. Which product is better for doing this.?
>>
>> 2. How do I set up A/R on a cash accounting method, since the Income
>> isn't recognized until actually received, i.e., what account (category)
>> would I use so that the Income and Expense statement only reflects income
>> actually received?
>>
>> 3. What would the specific entries be to:
>>
>> A. Record the amount due on the 1st of each month?
>>
>> B. Record the amount actually received and report as income at
>> this time?
>>
>> 4. We also have payables and sometimes we pay amounts over time.
>Similar
>> to the above, I would like to track "unpaid balances" but not record those
>> balances as expense until actually paid.
>>
>> What's the best Quicken product to use to accomplish the above. I don't
>want
>> to be too limited in capabilities but at the same time, I don't want to
>> "overkill" by buying more capability than necessary.
>>
>> Thanks in advance,
>> Richard
>>
>>
>>
>
Mike Block - Tax Cut CPA
World's #1 QuickBooks Top Tester
FREE NetLedger accounting
FREE 462p QB books/error codes
100+ QB add-ons http://blocktax.com/
QB no-spam news: biz.comp.accounting
-----------------------------------
Spam bait admin@localhost abuse@localhost
webmaster@localhost postmaster@127.0.0.1
enforcement@sec.gov cyberfraud@nasaa.org
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3a8730f1.51764402@news.mindspring.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!news.tele.dk!4.1.16.34!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.gtei.net!howland.erols.net!ix.netcom.com!news.mindspring.net!not-for-mailReferences:
<WL4h6.78$Sf1.239446@news.pacbell.net> <Xfbh6.233$q04.260456@news.pacbell.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 112670,1d9e92c5937996bc X-Google-Attributes: gid112670,public X-Google-Thread: fbe20,f1010d81dd4ba5fe,start X-Google-Attributes: gidfbe20,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-02-10 22:33:00 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!news.tele.dk!4.1.16.34!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.gtei.net!howland.erols.net!ix.netcom.com!news.mindspring.net!not-for-mail From: <mblockNO_SPAM@blocktax.com> (Mike Block, Tax Fighting C.P.A.) Newsgroups: alt.comp.software.financial.quickbooks,biz.comp.accounting Subject: Re: QUICKBOOKS STANDARD OR QUICKEN H&B Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 06:29:53 GMT Organization: MindSpring Enterprises Lines: 96 Approved: mblock@blocktax.com Message-ID: <3a8730f1.51764402@news.mindspring.com> References: <WL4h6.78$Sf1.239446@news.pacbell.net> <Xfbh6.233$q04.260456@news.pacbell.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: d1.56.a8.d9 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Server-Date: 11 Feb 2001 06:32:05 GMT X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.452