Thread View: alt.comp.software.financial.quicken
9 messages
9 total messages
Started by Steve Reynolds
Mon, 13 Jan 2003 07:02
Quicken Australia Demanding Statutory Declarations
Author: Steve Reynolds
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 07:02
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 07:02
14 lines
1716 bytes
1716 bytes
Has anybody else received the intimidating letter from Quicken Australia demanding that I send them a signed and countersigned (by a justice of the peace) statutory declaration declaring that I have removed their software from my computer because I have chosen not to continue paying for their annual subscription service? Is this the most thuggish software company in the world? Does any other software company resort to such threatening tactics? The most amazing thing about Quicken is I haven't used there software for more 12 months because it was so buggy I couldn't use it without it crashing . Steve
Re: Quicken Australia Demanding Statutory Declarations
Author: Frederick
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 07:47
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 07:47
20 lines
2190 bytes
2190 bytes
Yes, I received one today - by mistake. I had already paid for 12 months subscription via Internet. Regards Frederick "Steve Reynolds" <null@bitbucket.com> wrote in message news:MPG.188d0858c373fa7b989696@news-server... > Has anybody else received the intimidating letter from Quicken Australia > demanding that I send them a signed and countersigned (by a justice of > the peace) statutory declaration declaring that I have removed their > software from my computer because I have chosen not to continue paying > for their annual subscription service? > > Is this the most thuggish software company in the world? Does any other > software company resort to such threatening tactics? > > The most amazing thing about Quicken is I haven't used there software > for more 12 months because it was so buggy I couldn't use it without it > crashing . > > Steve >
Re: Quicken Australia Demanding Statutory Declarations
Author: Ben Hall
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 12:02
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 12:02
27 lines
2428 bytes
2428 bytes
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003 07:02:01 +0000, Steve Reynolds wrote: > Has anybody else received the intimidating letter from Quicken Australia > demanding that I send them a signed and countersigned (by a justice of > the peace) statutory declaration declaring that I have removed their > software from my computer because I have chosen not to continue paying > for their annual subscription service? > > Is this the most thuggish software company in the world? Does any other > software company resort to such threatening tactics? > > The most amazing thing about Quicken is I haven't used there software > for more 12 months because it was so buggy I couldn't use it without it > crashing . My subscription expired in December. I�ve got a reminder in my diary to pay them but haven�t done so, so far. I was planning to pay next payday. I was a little too generous over Christmas :-( I haven�t heard from Quicken but I think I paid full price for Quicken and found I had to pay subscription for share price updates. If I receive a letter I think I�ll write back inviting them to take legal action if they believe they have proof that I�m still using the software. Of course I will blow the MS partition away and use GnuCash under Linux. I�ve been running both Quicken and Gnu Cash in parallel for the past six months.
Re: Quicken Australia Demanding Statutory Declarations
Author: Steve Reynolds
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 12:52
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 12:52
16 lines
1907 bytes
1907 bytes
In article <pan.2003.01.13.12.02.56.747474@yahoo.com.au>, benhall_0 @yahoo.com.au says... > My subscription expired in December. I�ve got a reminder in my diary to > pay them but haven�t done so, so far. I was planning to pay next payday. > I was a little too generous over Christmas :-( > > I haven�t heard from Quicken but I think I paid full price for Quicken > and found I had to pay subscription for share price updates. That's what I thought, but apparently I only paid to rent their software for 12 months including the share price updates -- the devil is in the detail that I didn't read... Beware shonky software retailers. Some of my correspondence with them is published here www.sreynolds.org SR
Re: Quicken Australia Demanding Statutory Declarations
Author: Alan Moir
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 15:41
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 15:41
33 lines
2807 bytes
2807 bytes
Steve Reynolds <null@bitbucket.com> wrote in message news:<MPG.188d0858c373fa7b989696@news-server>... > Has anybody else received the intimidating letter from Quicken Australia > demanding that I send them a signed and countersigned (by a justice of > the peace) statutory declaration declaring that I have removed their > software from my computer because I have chosen not to continue paying > for their annual subscription service? > > Is this the most thuggish software company in the world? Does any other > software company resort to such threatening tactics? > > The most amazing thing about Quicken is I haven't used there software > for more 12 months because it was so buggy I couldn't use it without it > crashing . Glad I jumped ship when I did. Mid last year, after doing my usual half-yearly reformat and reinstall of all my software, Quicken refused to recognise the registration key I was given when I originally registered it (didn't want to in the first place, but it refuses to run after a while if you don't). It turned out I had to call their automated registration line and waste 5 mins while their dumb machine took my details. Then when it failed to recognise me, I had to repeat the process with an actual human, who finally gave my grovelling, obedient little self the activation key needed to get my copy to work. Not wanting to be a grovelling little dog on a leash anymore, I ended up switching to GnuCash on Linux, which was a royal pain in the ass. But it was worth it just to give Quicken Australia the middle finger. If only they would let me sell my copy of Quicken which has been sitting around gathering dust (Quicken Australia has even less respect for the concept of "first sale" than most software companies). It's probably time I ceremoniously cremated it. Alan
Re: Quicken Australia Demanding Statutory Declarations
Author: David Segall
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:23
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:23
38 lines
3320 bytes
3320 bytes
amoir@operamail.com (Alan Moir) wrote: >Steve Reynolds <null@bitbucket.com> wrote in message news:<MPG.188d0858c373fa7b989696@news-server>... >> Has anybody else received the intimidating letter from Quicken Australia >> demanding that I send them a signed and countersigned (by a justice of >> the peace) statutory declaration declaring that I have removed their >> software from my computer because I have chosen not to continue paying >> for their annual subscription service? >> >> Is this the most thuggish software company in the world? Does any other >> software company resort to such threatening tactics? >> >> The most amazing thing about Quicken is I haven't used there software >> for more 12 months because it was so buggy I couldn't use it without it >> crashing . > >Glad I jumped ship when I did. Mid last year, after doing my usual >half-yearly reformat and reinstall of all my software, Quicken refused >to recognise the registration key I was given when I originally >registered it (didn't want to in the first place, but it refuses to >run after a while if you don't). It turned out I had to call their >automated registration line and waste 5 mins while their dumb machine >took my details. Then when it failed to recognise me, I had to repeat >the process with an actual human, who finally gave my grovelling, >obedient little self the activation key needed to get my copy to work. > >Not wanting to be a grovelling little dog on a leash anymore, I ended >up switching to GnuCash on Linux, which was a royal pain in the ass. >But it was worth it just to give Quicken Australia the middle finger. >If only they would let me sell my copy of Quicken which has been >sitting around gathering dust (Quicken Australia has even less respect >for the concept of "first sale" than most software companies). It's >probably time I ceremoniously cremated it. > >Alan Don't cremate it. Please "sell" your copy of Quicken for one dollar to someone who is willing to conduct a lengthy argument with them. I'm sure you will find a volunteer on aus.ads.forsale.computers.used.
Re: Quicken Australia Demanding Statutory Declarations
Author: Bill Cullen
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 14:08
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 14:08
8 lines
1569 bytes
1569 bytes
Alan Moir said the following on 13/01/2003 11:41 PM: > Not wanting to be a grovelling little dog on a leash anymore, I ended > up switching to GnuCash on Linux, which was a royal pain in the ass. > But it was worth it just to give Quicken Australia the middle finger. Can you do up a BAS and with GnuCash? Bill
Re: Quicken Australia Demanding Statutory Declarations
Author: Ken Chambers
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 02:28
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 02:28
22 lines
2132 bytes
2132 bytes
I wonder what the Department of Fair Trading thinks about this. Me thinks I will send them a copy of the Quicken letter & ask for their comments. Ken. "Steve Reynolds" <null@bitbucket.com> wrote in message news:MPG.188d0858c373fa7b989696@news-server... > Has anybody else received the intimidating letter from Quicken Australia > demanding that I send them a signed and countersigned (by a justice of > the peace) statutory declaration declaring that I have removed their > software from my computer because I have chosen not to continue paying > for their annual subscription service? > > Is this the most thuggish software company in the world? Does any other > software company resort to such threatening tactics? > > The most amazing thing about Quicken is I haven't used there software > for more 12 months because it was so buggy I couldn't use it without it > crashing . > > Steve >
Re: Quicken Australia Demanding Statutory Declarations
Author: Liam Devlin
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 09:29
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 09:29
25 lines
2761 bytes
2761 bytes
Alan Moir wrote: > Steve Reynolds <null@bitbucket.com> wrote in message news:<MPG.188d0858c373fa7b989696@news-server>... (snip) > Glad I jumped ship when I did. Mid last year, after doing my usual > half-yearly reformat and reinstall of all my software, Quicken refused > to recognise the registration key I was given when I originally > registered it (didn't want to in the first place, but it refuses to > run after a while if you don't). It turned out I had to call their > automated registration line and waste 5 mins while their dumb machine > took my details. Then when it failed to recognise me, I had to repeat > the process with an actual human, who finally gave my grovelling, > obedient little self the activation key needed to get my copy to work. > > Not wanting to be a grovelling little dog on a leash anymore, I ended > up switching to GnuCash on Linux, which was a royal pain in the ass. > But it was worth it just to give Quicken Australia the middle finger. > If only they would let me sell my copy of Quicken which has been > sitting around gathering dust (Quicken Australia has even less respect > for the concept of "first sale" than most software companies). It's > probably time I ceremoniously cremated it. Maybe burning a few copies in effigy would grab the press's attention. That, IMHO, is the key to applying pressure to various companies.
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads