Article View: alt.comp.sys.palmtop.pilot
Article #10Re: Handspring Visor to be discontinued?
From: Robert Kim
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 08:45
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 08:45
37 lines
3410 bytes
3410 bytes
On Fri, 17 Jan 2003, Andrew Morgan wrote: > Personally I think Handspring have cut their own throat with this - The > Treo is a leap ahead of other communicators but the feature set is still > a whole heap below a Visor and a decent Mobile. > > If you guys are working on a springboard project - i would stop,. to be > honest, unless you have a captive audience or a specific use in which > case I would make sure I buy up enough Visors to equip my team before > tehy vanish. A couple months ago I had to call Handspring tech support and asked if they were discontinuing the Visors. The guy told me just the obsolete models like the Deluxe, the Platinum, and one more which I forget. He said they had too many commitments with Springboard Module manufacturers to stop making the entire Visor line. But after reading up on this, it looks like Handspring is going to totally screw the Springboard Module makers. Man, it's frustrating to watch a company with a great idea, like Handspring, sabotage themselves. I'm using a Visor Pro now with a Springboard Visorphone Module to make phone calls and to access the Internet/e-mail. I've tried the Treos at Staples and I much more prefer the Visor/Visorphone Module setup. My only gripe is that the Visorphone has a slow modem (14.4 K). Why in the world couldn't Handspring or the Visorphone maker just improve the Visorphone to 56 K and make other enhancements??? I think the Treos aren't as functional as the Visor/Visorphone setup and the Treos are way more expensive than this setup. If Handspring DOES screw the Springboard Module makers by discontinuing PDA's with Springboard Module slots, I hope someone else comes along and makes a PDA that can take the Springboard Modules. I'd gladly switch my loyalties to that company. I can't picture myself ever switching to a Treo, at least not the way they are presently designed. Bob
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<Pine.SOL.4.51.0301170332500.20670@herald.cc.purdue.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!cyclone.bc.net!HSNX.atgi.net!mozo.cc.purdue.edu!herald.cc.purdue.edu!roberthReferences:
<B8MV9.3244$F_3.1241@news.bellsouth.net> <3E27B735.4000507@erlangen.netsurf.de>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 109e18,77df38f20603118d X-Google-Attributes: gid109e18,public X-Google-Thread: 10baa0,77df38f20603118d X-Google-Attributes: gid10baa0,public X-Google-Thread: 11219a,77df38f20603118d X-Google-Attributes: gid11219a,public X-Google-Thread: 10cc5a,77df38f20603118d X-Google-Attributes: gid10cc5a,public X-Google-Thread: fd203,77df38f20603118d X-Google-Attributes: gidfd203,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-01-17 00:50:10 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!cyclone.bc.net!HSNX.atgi.net!mozo.cc.purdue.edu!herald.cc.purdue.edu!roberth From: Robert Kim <roberth@purdue.edu> Newsgroups: alt.comp.sys.palmtop.pilot,alt.comp.sys.palmtops,alt.comp.sys.palmtops.pilot,codewarrior.palm,comp.sys.palmtops Subject: Re: Handspring Visor to be discontinued? Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 03:45:00 -0500 Organization: Purdue University Lines: 37 Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.4.51.0301170332500.20670@herald.cc.purdue.edu> References: <B8MV9.3244$F_3.1241@news.bellsouth.net> <3E27B735.4000507@erlangen.netsurf.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: herald.cc.purdue.edu Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: mozo.cc.purdue.edu 1042793102 16174 128.210.11.29 (17 Jan 2003 08:45:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news@news.purdue.edu NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 08:45:02 +0000 (UTC) X-X-Sender: roberth@herald.cc.purdue.edu In-Reply-To: <3E27B735.4000507@erlangen.netsurf.de>