🚀 go-pugleaf

"Joe Cipale" <joec@aracnet.com> wrote in message
news:401D492E.40A861E3@aracnet.com...
> Maxwelton wrote:
> >
> > Joe Cipale <joec@aracnet.com> wrote in message
news:<401BFDB7.6DD299FF@aracnet.com>...
> > > Your Special Friend wrote:
> > > >
> > > > http://thekansan.com/stories/013004/vie_0130040039.shtml
> > > >
> > > > Exporting U.S. jobs
> >
> > > > The erosion of the U.S. industrial base has "enormous national
> > > > security implications," reports National Defense Magazine (August
> > > > 2003). The United States is so dependent on foreign countries for
> > > > critical components and systems that we may have lost our control of
> > > > our supply. We are now dependent on countries such as China, India,
> > > > Russia, France and Germany for critical weapons technology. For
> > > > America to be dependent on these nations is risky at best.
> > > >
> > > > A very glaring local example is "Boeing to create jobs in South
Korea"
> > > > (Kansan, April 2002). Boeing has a contract to make 40 F-I5 fighter
> > > > jets, the first-line fighter of the U.S. Air Force, and will build a
> > > > plant in South Korea, employing 30,000 workers to manufacture them.
> > > > Boeing also states that any future orders of F-1 5's will see
> > > > manufacture in the South Korea plant.
> > > >
> > I see the exporting of high tech and particularly defense work
troublesome.
> > For these reasons:
> >     1. Not just loss of current jobs in the US but future jobs and
skills
> >         will also be lost. Right now you here the gripe that americans
> >        should posses better technical skills, well that will only get
> >        worse if there is no demand for it.
> >     2. Taxes are taken without choice and spent not on an american
worker
> >        but one in another country.
> >     3. Reliance on another nation for our defense structure is way too
risky.
>
> And what REALLY frightens me about your final point is that our
> administration (be it Senate, COngress, resident-in-cheif) are aiding
> and abetting this. THis is more of a threat to our national security
> than a fucking airplane being flown into another high-rise building!
>
> Can you imagine some foreing coder developing a piece of code to control
> an air defense or missile launcher? Can you imagine said piece of code
> being compromised? What would the ramifications be? Firing on our own
> troops? Disabling the launch codes? a virus/security vulernability that
> leaves a system open for cyber-attack?
>
> The possibilities are endless, IMO.
>


i would first like to explore this possibility: can we avoid "friendly fire"
and chopper accidents that kill more of our troops than enemies do?
can we spare our youth from joining army just because they can't find jobs
elsewhere?


> Joe
> --
> #----------------------------------------------------------#
> #                   Penguinix Consulting                   #
> #----------------------------------------------------------#
> #            Software development, QA and testing.         #
> #                Linux support and training.               #
> #                "Don't fear the penguin!"                 #
> #----------------------------------------------------------#
> # Registered Linux user: #309247     http://counter.li.org #
> #----------------------------------------------------------#