Article View: alt.computer.consultants
Article #174Re: Can we do programming without seeing the end user?
From: David Hamilton
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 1996 16:31
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 1996 16:31
44 lines
3087 bytes
3087 bytes
bollerud@oslonett.no (Svein Olav Mytting) told us: >I started it, and it is crossposted through several groups. >I intended to start a discussion on possibilities of telework and virtual >organization in the software business, specifically when it comes to >non-shrinkwrapped programs and physical relationship programmer/end user. >The original question was rather unclear, I am afraid, but a whole >lot of nice pieces of wisdom have been shared. Telework and virtual organization are not a detriment to the development process -- in fact they work quite well for us. The caveat is that _someone_ must define the software project adequately, before coding begins. In an ideal world, or with an ideal client, the client's requirements are thoroughly defined and have been thought through and discussed adequately, such that a project can be planned, quoted, and completed remotely. There actually are such clients (don't even bother asking...). But this is the exception, and a very rare exception. It is far more common that extensive dialog must take place between the client and a knowlegable software designer, before an adequate degree of specificity and definition is achieved, and both parties feel warm 'n' fuzzy. It is not usually feasible for this dialog to take place without face-to-face meetings. There is no reason why the software designer participating in these dialogs must be the one handling the coding phase, however. There is ample opportunity for a "telework broker", in this regard. Those virtual organizations that have been using telwork sucessfully for consulting and contract software development are already using this approach. There are also an interesting set of ambiguities when it comes to using teleworkers who reside in different countries. The issues of taxes, licenses, permits, tariffs, etc., are enough to overheat the brain. Most of these regulations were composed for traditional on-site business and employment relationships and do not translate well to a telework scenario. --dh ____________________________________________________________________ David Hamilton Ursus Information Technology, Inc.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3177ba2d.974365@nntp.best.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!nntp1.best.com!usenetReferences:
<4j2qon$3f3@nntp1.best.com> <4j4cel$out@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <Pine.OSF.3.91a.960326020136.11952K-100000@christa.unh.edu> <316C47B1.EB9@gate.net> <4knc45$fb2@news.bdsnet.com> <316ff4c4.3923732@news2.new-york.net> <VsSSnOggyznL071yn@oslonett.no>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!nntp1.best.com!usenet From: davidh@ursus.com (David Hamilton) Newsgroups: alt.computer.consultants,comp.edu,comp.lang.basic.misc,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.misc,comp.lang.pascal.borland,comp.lang.pascal.delphi.misc,comp.misc,comp.os.msdos.programmer,comp.os.os2.programmer.misc,comp.programming Subject: Re: Can we do programming without seeing the end user? Date: Fri, 19 Apr 1996 16:31:40 GMT Organization: Ursus Information Technology, Inc. Message-ID: <3177ba2d.974365@nntp.best.com> References: <4j2qon$3f3@nntp1.best.com> <4j4cel$out@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <Pine.OSF.3.91a.960326020136.11952K-100000@christa.unh.edu> <316C47B1.EB9@gate.net> <4knc45$fb2@news.bdsnet.com> <316ff4c4.3923732@news2.new-york.net> <VsSSnOggyznL071yn@oslonett.no> Reply-To: davidh@ursus.com NNTP-Posting-Host: davidh.vip.best.com X-Newsreader: Forte Agent .99d/32.182