🚀 go-pugleaf

On May 12, 9:46 am, reinhardt <servicec...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> On May 12, 9:00 am, Stray Dog <straydog2...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 11, 2:13 pm, phil scott <p...@philscott.net> wrote:
>
> > > On May 11, 9:25 am, reinhardt <servicec...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > "Welcome" to the 21st century "humans-as-disposable-kleenex" labor-
> > > > > management functionality.
>
> > > > Cite a century when humans weren't disposable?
>
> > Any century in which there were "important" people and "important" is
> > defined as: i) the king/emperor, ii) anyone in the court of the king/
> > emperor (i.e. his buddies), and iii) anyone that the king or emperor
> > thought was important. Most people were, otherwise, unimportant,
> > disposable, expendable, etc.
>
> > Now, on a different tangent people need to think about _rights_ (eg.
> > Bill of Rights, Magna Carta). And, of course revolts, rebellions, and
> > revolutions.
>
> > > the man has only to rephrase his statement to include  'are
> > > becoming'... and of course his remark was not literal, but to make the
> > > point that with international business, labor options wide open,
> > > business need not depend on a local labor force..so that is becoming
> > > relatively more and more disposable in that context.
>
> > All you people need to decide that you're going to start getting
> > vocal, write letters to the politicos, organize your neigborhoods,
> > make noise, scream bloody murder!!!
>
> > When unions were stronger and we didn't have to deal with cheap
> > currency countries, its going to hurt us, the USA, in the long run.
>
> i strongly believe "rights" are an accident as a result of the effect
> of steam power on the traditional labor equation
>
> rights are a fluke.. a stop gap out of desparation
>
> sort like Washington using the new militia laws to protect his whiskey
> monopoly- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

that view as with countless others is 100% correct when viewed from
its own contexts..paradigm/ whatever.    it is correct.    and as we
live within these various structures there are views that are 100%
correct within them, are correct, and can be proven correct.... that
is they are proveably and flawlessly accurate...and thats why you are
so sure your notion is correct.

you are sure it is correct because it can be observed to be correct
within the scope and range of your considerations...and thats been
true from the beginning of time apparently.

***

It is just that paradigms shift, as on Bastile day for instance, or
when the romanians hung their recent leader by his balls, or as with
the various and glorous world wide banking collapses that occur with
great regularity..... but still....you remain correct in many aspects
or all aspects depending on which view of existence you adopt...and
you remain free to adopt any you wish... it is just that these things
are both relative and in flux, and with trade offs, often not seen or
factored into the equation.


Phil Scott