Article View: alt.computer.consultants
Article #989Re: Exporting U.S. jobs
From: Kamal R. Prasad
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2004 06:50
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2004 06:50
81 lines
5778 bytes
5778 bytes
Philip J. Koenig <See_email_@ddress_below.This_one_is.invalid> wrote in message news:<MPG.1a8bb5b48ab91b9598a3f6@corp.supernews.com>... > In article <181e352f.0402042306.7387eb6c@posting.google.com>, kamalp@acm.org (Kamal > R. Prasad) writes... > > "Old Enough to Know Better" <SpamSucks@NoSpam.com> wrote in message news:<jMiUb.135023$f97.29635@fe3.columbus.rr.com>... > > > "DontOutsourceMe" <dontoutsourcemyjob@yahoo.com> wrote in message > > > news:6f37046c.0402021822.27225c74@posting.google.com... > > > > Flavius Vespasianus <nl@nl.com> wrote in message > news:<asATb.9856$uM2.342@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>... > > > > > Joe Cipale <joec@aracnet.com> wrote in > > > > > news:401D492E.40A861E3@aracnet.com: > > > > > > > > > > > Can you imagine some foreing coder developing a piece of code to > > > > > > control an air defense or missile launcher? Can you imagine said piece > > > > > > of code being compromised? What would the ramifications be? Firing on > > > > > > our own troops? Disabling the launch codes? a virus/security > > > > > > vulernability that leaves a system open for cyber-attack? > > > > > > > > > > > > The possibilities are endless, IMO. > > > > > > > > > > The White House e-mail system was offshored. > > > > > > I hope you aren't serious! If so can you provide proof? > > > > > > > > > > So whats the problem?? Anything and Everything can be offshored to > > > > India and things will be just fine!! > > > > > > I hope you aren't serious! > > > Technical issues aside everything would not be "fine". > > > First US taxpayer money should not be used for offshoring of government IT > > > systems *ever*. > > > If you can't see the security issue here then I have some beachfront > > > property in Oklahoma I like to talk to you about. > > > > During the boom period of 1997-2001, there was a tremendous shortage > > of IT professionals to execute govt. contracts. Lots of Indians were > > hired esp in the DC area for govt. contractual work. When the economy > > tanked, the BCIS came up with a security problem so that no > > non-citizens would be employed. the workers were laid off, and > > american replacements were trained. I understand your security and > > economic concerns. But shouldn't this be disclosed upfront to the > > job-seeker? BTW -are non-US citizens guaranteed to pose a security > > threat? Was Tmothy McVeigh not a US citizen? > > > > regards > > -kamal > > > I don't think it's the workers - per se - that are the security > threat. There are various problems with such things as oversight, > geography, management, and differences in legal situations in > different countries that can make it easier for security breaches > to happen. > Security breaches as in access to classified information, is a small set of jobs which are/were already off-limtis to individuals without a security clearance, for which you need to be a citizen. The BCIS made a generic rule of thumb that anything to do with the govt meant that foreign citizens were a security hazard. Its more to do with hypothesizing without concrete evidence than a genuine security threat that such jobs didn't require a security clearance till the BCIS decided they do. > If a US citizen is accused of espionage or treason, I would think > it would be a lot easier to prosecute them than the citizen of > another country if that country decides not to be cooperative -- ie > refuses to extradite the suspect, or constrains the prosecution > in some other way. For example in Europe they often refuse to > extradite an individual if they face the death penalty, since it > is an outlawed form of punishment in the EU. Yes -that is true. But once a person leaves India and is working in the US, he is automatically govedrned by US Federal & State law. The immunity if any, will apply once the person returns to India. In general, if the country is a well-established democratic country, you need prime-facia evidence to extadite, and that probably gives them[neo-cons] good reason not to let foreigners do sensitive jobs:-). regards -kamal
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<181e352f.0402052250.31d759e5@posting.google.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<1214fb08.0401311057.525b866b@posting.google.com> <401BFDB7.6DD299FF@aracnet.com> <e3398e5.0402010649.4dc66d20@posting.google.com> <401D492E.40A861E3@aracnet.com> <asATb.9856$uM2.342@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net> <6f37046c.0402021822.27225c74@posting.google.com> <jMiUb.135023$f97.29635@fe3.columbus.rr.com> <181e352f.0402042306.7387eb6c@posting.google.com> <MPG.1a8bb5b48ab91b9598a3f6@corp.supernews.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 11227a,4704b573777c5a2e X-Google-Attributes: gid11227a,public X-Google-Thread: 102b3b,4704b573777c5a2e X-Google-Attributes: gid102b3b,public X-Google-Thread: 110f21,4704b573777c5a2e X-Google-Attributes: gid110f21,public X-Google-Thread: 10bbc3,4704b573777c5a2e X-Google-Attributes: gid10bbc3,public X-Google-Thread: fa874,4704b573777c5a2e X-Google-Attributes: gidfa874,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-02-05 22:50:16 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: kamalp@acm.org (Kamal R. Prasad) Newsgroups: alt.computer.consultants,soc.culture.indian,alt.politics.economics,ba.internet,soc.culture.british Subject: Re: Exporting U.S. jobs Date: 5 Feb 2004 22:50:16 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 81 Message-ID: <181e352f.0402052250.31d759e5@posting.google.com> References: <1214fb08.0401311057.525b866b@posting.google.com> <401BFDB7.6DD299FF@aracnet.com> <e3398e5.0402010649.4dc66d20@posting.google.com> <401D492E.40A861E3@aracnet.com> <asATb.9856$uM2.342@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net> <6f37046c.0402021822.27225c74@posting.google.com> <jMiUb.135023$f97.29635@fe3.columbus.rr.com> <181e352f.0402042306.7387eb6c@posting.google.com> <MPG.1a8bb5b48ab91b9598a3f6@corp.supernews.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 203.200.162.100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1076050216 29109 127.0.0.1 (6 Feb 2004 06:50:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 06:50:16 +0000 (UTC)