🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: alt.consumers
Article #2034

Re: AT&T. Major Ripoff!

#2034
From: Cowchipper
Date: Mon, 05 Jul 1999 00:00
89 lines
4546 bytes
5c out of state  ,15c in state, 3 min minimum.
you call!!! I don't need to call I know!!!! It depends on which state you
live in and If you have ever used their service before.
DUH!!!!



Lobo wrote in message <7lqs3b$ptt$1@holly.prod.itd.earthlink.net>...
>Cowchipper, that is a lie.   Use the 800 number provided and check for
>yourself.   800-380-0546.
>
>Since you're not using them I suppose that just makes you more stupid.
>
>You certainly have selected a good name for yourself, very fitting and a
bit
>more polite than then real meaning "bullshit".
>
>Lobo
>
>
>Cowchipper <cowchipper@thefarm.net> wrote in message
>news:931195702.496.99@news.remarQ.com...
>> 10-10-636 is 10c a min and charges a fee in some areas
>> 10-10-811 is also 10c a min with no fee
>> If there was a place using 5c a min then I would be with them.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ..
>> James Hilton wrote in message <7lqfcq$s9n$1@bgtnsc02.worldnet.att.net>...
>> >Make sure you call the carrier before you use the dial around or switch
>you
>> >PIC. get all the info you can including the service reps name employee
>code
>> >and/or ext. and what office they are in, there many offices around the
>> >country for some companies.  Try  VarTec I have had good luck with them.
>> 800
>> >544 1510.. I pay $.10 per min out of state and in state, in Illinois, is
>> >$.05  the dial around is 10 10 811. Also if you get calling cards from
>any
>> >company make them explain all the charges including surcharges from the
>> >payphone provider ( this is important cause this can double your Calling
>> >card calls, not all LD carriers will pass along any surcharges) and
never
>> >use a Independent payphone ALWAYS use the Bell payphone. it can mean the
>> >difference between a .50 call and a 15.00 call. I had this happen to me,
>I
>> >call three miles, still local according to the Ameritech(the bell here)
>> >using a independent and the .50 call cost me about 14.50. I called and
>> >bitched and threatened to call the FCC and the ICC and they cut the
14.50
>> to
>> >7.00. I had no choice but to pay it... Be careful this is your wallet
you
>> >are playing with.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >Bulimia <bulimia@bulimia.com> wrote in message
>>
>news:D12D8236679A4ECF.698FFA9226929A58.5A8E11954ADFAE17@lp.airnews.net...
>> >> So, is there a long distance service that is somewhat reasonable in
>> >> price that does not have a monthly fee ? ? ? ? (so I can use dial
>> >> around services)
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, 05 Jul 1999 04:50:27 -0600, Dustin Paul Gaydos
>> >> <dustin@unm.edu> wrote:
>> >> >Bulimia wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> These guys seem to have a good deal:
>> >> >> http://1016444.com/
>> >> >> Question: If you have SWB block long distance calls, do they also
>> >> >> block call around (10-10345) services?
>> >> >
>> >> >yes they block the 10-10 numbers and they charge you a surcharge just
>to
>> >block the
>> >> >long distance.  It is about 2-5 bucks.
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
>
Technical Details
Message-ID: <931199712.715.69@news.remarQ.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <930525533.727.46@news.remarQ.com> <377774f1.4539037@news.flash.net> <42EE708F47D1875E.9BEF6A193E166439.66771D7D960E34D6@lp.airnews.net> <199907030252.CAA08273@berlin.neuropa.net> <CE4AB735C016EE99.91F70E5AAE4A4274.B63367C47AB06DBC@lp.airnews.net> <377EE2A1.3012CD8B@prodigy.net> <A4B278B6705F7045.4C3F357B9810C571.CD739F694F74B400@lp.airnews.net> <37808DF3.BB05E8CB@unm.edu> <D12D8236679A4ECF.698FFA9226929A58.5A8E11954ADFAE17@lp.airnews.net> <7lqfcq$s9n$1@bgtnsc02.worldnet.att.net> <931195702.496.99@news.remarQ.com> <7lqs3b$ptt$1@holly.prod.itd.earthlink.net>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: fa6e6,3a44e162779ad647
X-Google-Attributes: gidfa6e6,public
X-Google-Thread: 10f73f,3a44e162779ad647
X-Google-Attributes: gid10f73f,public
X-Google-Thread: 11474a,3a44e162779ad647
X-Google-Attributes: gid11474a,public
X-Google-Thread: 10b420,3a44e162779ad647
X-Google-Attributes: gid10b420,public
From: "Cowchipper" <cowchipper@thefarm.net>
Subject: Re: AT&T. Major Ripoff!
Date: 1999/07/05
Message-ID: <931199712.715.69@news.remarQ.com>
X-Deja-AN: 497460196
References: <930525533.727.46@news.remarQ.com> <377774f1.4539037@news.flash.net> <42EE708F47D1875E.9BEF6A193E166439.66771D7D960E34D6@lp.airnews.net> <199907030252.CAA08273@berlin.neuropa.net> <CE4AB735C016EE99.91F70E5AAE4A4274.B63367C47AB06DBC@lp.airnews.net> <377EE2A1.3012CD8B@prodigy.net> <A4B278B6705F7045.4C3F357B9810C571.CD739F694F74B400@lp.airnews.net> <37808DF3.BB05E8CB@unm.edu> <D12D8236679A4ECF.698FFA9226929A58.5A8E11954ADFAE17@lp.airnews.net> <7lqfcq$s9n$1@bgtnsc02.worldnet.att.net> <931195702.496.99@news.remarQ.com> <7lqs3b$ptt$1@holly.prod.itd.earthlink.net>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
X-Complaints-To: newsabuse@remarQ.com
X-Trace: 931199712.715.69 DKLEKMOXPF261CE68C qube-01.us-ca.remarq.com
Organization: Posted via RemarQ, http://www.remarQ.com - The Internet's Discussion Network
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 05 Jul 1999 18:35:12 GMT
Newsgroups: alt.consumers,alt.consumers.experiences,alt.consumers.free-stuff,dfw.forsale