Article View: alt.consumers
Article #2085Re: LAWS NEED TO BE CHANGED FOR OVERTIME.
From: Linda & Gary Walker
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 05:10
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 05:10
112 lines
5453 bytes
5453 bytes
I agree with the original. However, I fully understand that
extra work may be required, but some of these organiza-
tions have grown to simply rely on it.
One of the latter respondents on this thread commented
that he tries to cap his schedule a 50 hours per week.
As an example of $75K annually, these extra permanent
10 hours weekly are costing this individual $7.50 each hour, and 25% of his
life with his family. I'll bet that he hasn't been offered any 25% increases
recently.
Perhaps there are other compensatory offerings here, I
really have no way to tell. But, when this chronic overtime
seems to always be caused by:
. Reaction to fires which could have been anticipated.
. The holdback of information by managers.
. The general reactive environment.
. Meetings.... Meetings.... Meetings....
. General interruptions.
. "Musical" schedules and priorities.
. And my favorite - insufficient planning and execution.
Then it's time to make some necessary changes. I would
be interested in the details of "salary game illegality" that
is mentioned in this thread.
"no name" <noname@noname.com> wrote in message
news:Z5M28.11819$OS5.1011251@newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net...
> Here are a few links that I found when I ran across the same questions
that
> you have.
>
> I think the second one listed defines the laws for you. Found out my
> employer was playing the salary game illegally...
>
>
http://www.nolo.com/lawcenter/ency/index.cfm/catID/4BEF1F62-722F-435E-98AB18
> 960A6EAB0E
>
> http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/statutes/latoc.html
>
> http://shopdfw.net/ticknorlawofficecom/LegalLinksI.html
>
> http://www.twc.state.tx.us/customers/jsemp/jsempsub7.html
>
>
>
> "Don" <calldonREMOVE@earthlink.net> wrote in message
> news:hlvm4u8rtd1h5vqsuuhab7ch6b4mhrq7um@4ax.com...
> > On Sun, 20 Jan 2002 14:58:05 -0600, "Shamish" <shchartudi@yahoo.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >I'm in the computer field. I think its time the fed. govt stepped in
and
> > >regulated all of this free labor companies are getting. 50, 60,
sometimes
> 70
> > >hour weeks or more. All for the same salary as a 40 hour week. If you
> refuse
> > >to work over, you get fired. If you take off early, your frowned upon.
> There
> > >is something seriously wrong with that picture.
> >
> > Yes, there IS something seriously wrong with that picture. YOU!!!
> >
> > If you don't like it, you have the freedom to quit. When you were
> > first hired, you were probably told WHAT was expected of you for that
> > position.
> >
> > >I ask you. Why in the F**C should I give my time to a business for
free?
> >
> > If you don't like it, then quit! Find a new job.
> >
> > >What have these companies done to deserve
> > >taking a chunk out of my life that doesn't belong to them.
> >
> > Obviously, you KNEW what was expected before you started there. If
> > not, then it is your fault for staying.
> >
> > >Anything over 40 hours should be paid for. A good service for a good
> wage.
> >
> > READ YOUR CONTRACT WITH YOUR COMPANY!
> >
> > >CHANGE THE EMPLOYMENT LAWS!!!!
> >
> > If you don't like it, QUIT!
> >
> > D*
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > "The national budget must be balanced. The public debt must be
> > reduced; the arrogance of the authorities must be moderated and
> > controlled. Payments to foreign governments must be reduced,
> > if the nation doesn't want to go bankrupt. People must again
> > learn to work, instead of living on public assistance."
> > - - (Marcus Tullius Cicero, 55 B.C.)
> >
> > "I will do ANYTHING to win."
> > - - (Al Gore)
> >
>
>
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<qpN28.4245$Qg3.1509187741@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.cwix.com!newscon02.news.prodigy.com!newsmst01.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!postmaster.news.prodigy.com!newssvr11.news.prodigy.com.POSTED!not-for-mailReferences:
<u4mbrb9jrr6r60@corp.supernews.com> <hlvm4u8rtd1h5vqsuuhab7ch6b4mhrq7um@4ax.com> <Z5M28.11819$OS5.1011251@newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 11474a,3a3740aad94b7572 X-Google-Attributes: gid11474a,public X-Google-Thread: f8c03,3a3740aad94b7572 X-Google-Attributes: gidf8c03,public X-Google-Thread: 104ad1,3a3740aad94b7572 X-Google-Attributes: gid104ad1,public X-Google-Thread: 10f73f,3a3740aad94b7572 X-Google-Attributes: gid10f73f,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-01-20 21:11:07 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.cwix.com!newscon02.news.prodigy.com!newsmst01.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!postmaster.news.prodigy.com!newssvr11.news.prodigy.com.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Linda & Gary Walker" <lgvwalk@swbell.net> Newsgroups: alt.consumers,alt.consumers.experiences,dfw.general,dfw.jobs References: <u4mbrb9jrr6r60@corp.supernews.com> <hlvm4u8rtd1h5vqsuuhab7ch6b4mhrq7um@4ax.com> <Z5M28.11819$OS5.1011251@newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net> Subject: Re: LAWS NEED TO BE CHANGED FOR OVERTIME. Lines: 114 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Message-ID: <qpN28.4245$Qg3.1509187741@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.69.129.215 X-Complaints-To: abuse@prodigy.net X-Trace: newssvr11.news.prodigy.com 1011589846 ST000 65.69.129.215 (Mon, 21 Jan 2002 00:10:46 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 00:10:46 EST Organization: Prodigy Internet http://www.prodigy.com X-UserInfo1: Q[OKR]_GBJVKRSH]]ZN@_TDAYZOZ@GXOXZ^D]\YIJYWZUYICD^RAQBKZQTZTX\_I[^G_KGFNON[ZOE_AZNVO^\XGGNTCIRPIJH[@RQKBXLRZ@CD^HKANYVW@RLGEZEJN@\_WZJBNZYYKVIOR]T]MNMG_Z[YVWSCH_Q[GPC_A@CARQVXDSDA^M]@DRVUM@RBM Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 05:10:46 GMT