Article View: alt.consumers
Article #235Re: Ultimate Revenge on Telemarketers
From: Geoff Miller
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 13:38
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 13:38
73 lines
4411 bytes
4411 bytes
George Grapman <sfgeorge@pacbell.net> writes: > I got an automated call from a candidate last night. [...] > I noted that had there been an emergency I would have lost > about 30 seconds. So get call waiting. Problem solved. Is this a great country, or what? There's nothing you can't get here in the Big PX. Your objection comes across as a bit sanctimonious. If you don't have call waiting, you potentially miss an emergency call every time you're on the phone -- especially when you engage in the sort of extended, casual chitchat with friends and family that we all use our telephones for from time to time. It seems to me that if you were as concerned about missing emer- gency calls as you profess to be, you'd limit the number and duration of your own calls to the absolute minimum. And it's possible that you do just that -- but it isn't terribly likely. So why not just be forthright about what really bugs you, and tell the candidate that his automated calls are objectionable because they're annoying and intrusive? Seems to me, that's plenty good enough. _My_ objection to automated calls is a bit different. I've been getting an awful lot of election-related phone spam of late. There was yet another automated message on my answering machine when I came home last Friday evening. Being tired after a long day, not to mention sick of telephonic political pestering, I listened to just enough of it to determine that it was yet another recording and then hit the Delete button. The next morning I read a transcript of the recording in a local- interest newsgroup, ba.mountain-folk; it turned out that everyone in my community had received it: "This is the Santa Cruz County Sheriff's department with a recorded message. It's 7:20pm on the 20th of October. We're calling to notify the residents of the Boulder Creek area that we are looking for an armed and dangerous, wanted subject who may be on foot in your area. His name is Bobby Dean Wilson. He's a white male in his 40's. He's approximately 5 feet, 9 inches tall and he has a stocky build, with shaggy, reddish-blond hair and a moustache, and no clothing description at this time. He is considered armed and dangerous. If you see him or anyone suspicious in your area after receiving this message, please stay inside or remain in a safe place, and call 9-1-1 immediately. Thank you." Neat, eh? Granted, I probably should've listened to the message a _bit_ longer than I did, but I was tired after a long day, it was Friday evening, and I was in one of those "Leave me the the hell alone, world" moods. Maybe this raises a good reason to consider outlawing automated phone calls not of an emergency nature. If people get inured to them to the point where they delete them without even listening to them, there's a certain "boy who cried 'wolf'" dynamic at work that will eventually cause somebody to miss something he really does need to hear. Geoff -- "The best delineator of high status is the tossed salad." -- Vance Packard
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<ehnpch$k0d@u1.netgate.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!tethys.csu.net!nntp.csufresno.edu!sn-xt-sjc-02!sn-xt-sjc-08!sn-post-sjc-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!u1.netgate.net!not-for-mailReferences:
<bearclaw-29937E.14115624102006@news.supernews.com> <2Ou%g.15796$GR.2689@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net> <1161725081.731055.260860@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com> <HHv%g.2739$T_1.1412@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10f73f,74fdd225e5c97239 X-Google-Thread: 11474a,74fdd225e5c97239 X-Google-Thread: 106595,74fdd225e5c97239 X-Google-Thread: 107518,74fdd225e5c97239 X-Google-Thread: f6c48,74fdd225e5c97239 X-Google-Attributes: gid10f73f,gid11474a,gid106595,gid107518,gidf6c48,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!tethys.csu.net!nntp.csufresno.edu!sn-xt-sjc-02!sn-xt-sjc-08!sn-post-sjc-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!u1.netgate.net!not-for-mail From: geoffm@u1.netgate.net (Geoff Miller) Newsgroups: alt.consumers,alt.consumers.experiences,ba.consumers,misc.consumers,misc.consumers.frugal-living Subject: Re: Ultimate Revenge on Telemarketers Followup-To: alt.consumers,alt.consumers.experiences,ba.consumers,misc.consumers,misc.consumers.frugal-living Date: 25 Oct 2006 06:38:25 -0700 Organization: Former Fetuses For Choice Message-ID: <ehnpch$k0d@u1.netgate.net> Sender: geoffm@netgate.net References: <bearclaw-29937E.14115624102006@news.supernews.com> <2Ou%g.15796$GR.2689@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net> <1161725081.731055.260860@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com> <HHv%g.2739$T_1.1412@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com> Reply-To: geoffm@netgate.net X-Complaints-To: abuse@supernews.com Lines: 74