🚀 go-pugleaf

bearclaw@cruller.invalid () wrote in
news:bearclaw-460BDE.22560101082006@news.supernews.com: 

> In article <44d51b11.30802260@news.earthlink.net>,
>  hchickpea@hotmail.com wrote:
> 
>> bearclaw@cruller.invalid wrote:
>> 
>> >In article <Xns9812DC4D7CFFBVeebleFetzer@216.250.184.7>,
>> > Bert Hyman <bert@iphouse.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Just like the administration before it, and the administration
>> >> before that, and the administration before that, and ... 
>> >
>> >Certainly not with the brazen contempt of the Bush
>> >administration. Clinton was perhaps the nearest.
>> >
>> >> The FCC has been around for decades.
>> >
>> >Not Bush's FCC.
>> 
>> You are out of your waters.  I was constantly aware of the power
>> the FCC in the 1950s and 1960s had to shut down or revoke the
>> license of radio and television stations.  One sentence out of
>> Howard Stern's mouth would have shut a station up tight.  Newton
>> Minow was as close to a king as they come in a line of kings.  No
>> one in broadcasting dared cross him in any way.
>> <http://www.museum.tv/archives/etv/M/htmlM/minownewton/minownewton.
>> htm> 
> 
> Okay, so is that what you are promoting? 

Who's promoting anything?

You were apparently under the impression that government control over
the content of TV and radio programming was something new. 

Someone has now told you differently.

What's ->your point?

Are you going to try to stick to your historical revisionism so that
you can continue to yammer about how oppressive the current
administration is? 

-- 
Bert Hyman | St. Paul, MN | bert@iphouse.com