Article View: alt.consumers
Article #591Re: The Good Wife Guide
From: freeisbest
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 02:16
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 02:16
29 lines
3169 bytes
3169 bytes
Larry Bud wrote:
> freeisbest wrote:
> > Larry Bud wrote:
> > > > We younger women enthusiastically went for it at first, until many
> > > > of us slowly began to realize that we were, in fact, undereducated,
> > > > unemployable, unpaid servants with almost no financial status, and in
> > > > many states, few property right and sharply limited legal rights.
> > > > ...And then the Sixties came.
> > >
> > > Yep, and unwed mothers and sky rocketing divorce rates followed.
> >
> > Yes, and those were only a few of the immediate benefits! :)
> >
> > It is a pure delight to remember that sudden night-and-day change
> > of social rules. Young women were suddenly free *not* to marry badly,
> > merely to 'give the baby a name'.
>
> The fact that you believe that the only benefit to a baby that has a
> married mother and father is that the baby gets a name just shows the
> ignorance you have of the negative impact to children raised in a
> single mother household.
It would help if I knew what studies you're referring to, and also,
can you explain what that negative impact might be.
Perhaps I haven't made clear that I have seen many kinds of
households for quite a few decades. I am certain that there is a
profound negative impact on children raised in a
one-female-plus-one-tenth-of-a-male-parent household.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1156385780.377881.249880@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<bearclaw-CD1053.01392123082006@news.supernews.com> <1156333288.706685.113890@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com> <1156359135.803317.19960@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> <1156359623.719676.54170@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com> <1156361401.001910.5590@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1156376441.844343.113100@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10f73f,4320a0aafc8a69f5 X-Google-Thread: 11474a,4320a0aafc8a69f5 X-Google-Thread: 106595,4320a0aafc8a69f5 X-Google-Thread: 107518,4320a0aafc8a69f5 X-Google-Thread: f6c48,4320a0aafc8a69f5 X-Google-Attributes: gid10f73f,gid11474a,gid106595,gid107518,gidf6c48,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: "freeisbest" <demeter547opine@yahoo.com> Newsgroups: alt.consumers,alt.consumers.experiences,ba.consumers,misc.consumers,misc.consumers.frugal-living Subject: Re: The Good Wife Guide Date: 23 Aug 2006 19:16:20 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 30 Message-ID: <1156385780.377881.249880@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> References: <bearclaw-CD1053.01392123082006@news.supernews.com> <1156333288.706685.113890@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com> <1156359135.803317.19960@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> <1156359623.719676.54170@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com> <1156361401.001910.5590@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1156376441.844343.113100@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.18.162.97 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1156385786 29478 127.0.0.1 (24 Aug 2006 02:16:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 02:16:26 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <1156376441.844343.113100@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/0.2 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.6) Gecko/20060728 Firefox/1.5.0.6,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com; posting-host=68.18.162.97; posting-account=TVWDjQ0AAAB4kjgPWomaSZuLiL1ldLIi