🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: alt.consumers
Article #708

Re: U.S. National Identity Card (RFID) Coming in 2008

#708
From: Rod Speed
Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 00:30
67 lines
3532 bytes
Newsgroup <janedoe@icubed.com> wrote

> I've been very concerned with RFID technology.  So much so, that when given an 
> opportunity to research the subject during a graduate class, I took it. Here's the 
> basics of what I learned:

You failed.

> RFID is simply a number or ID on a card.

It can be quite a bit more than just that. The data can be included too.

> This ID number can be read by an RFID reader.  The ID in itself means absolutely 
> nothing.  That
> ID linked to a database means everything.

Its more complicated than that.

> As long as the security of the database is good and the ID is not a combination of 
> identifiable
> information, then RFID is not a security risk.

Depends on how its used. Its obviously theoretically
possible to clone an RFID so that it will fool a system
that is looking for that particular ID.

> The readers have issues though.  Water, such as rain makes accurate readings difficult. 
> Remember, that the "RF" in RFID is radio frequency.  Water disrupts radio waves.

Thats not true in a practical sense with most use of RFID.

> Distance is an issue too. They have very short accurate distances.

It aint that short.

> The other major issue which will decrease in time, is the cost of the readers.  They are 
> extremely expensive.

No they arent.

> Short answer is the ID is meaningless without the link to the data.

Gross over simplication.

> There are still technical and cost issues that need to be overcome to make it 
> consistantly accurate and cost effective.

Wrong.


> Ari Silverstein <abcarisilverstein@yahoo.comxyz> wrote
>> Joshua Putnam wrote

>>> On one hand, nothing in the cited legislation says anything about
>>> RFID, and RFID tracking seems like a ridiculous proposal that no
>>> politician would expect to get away with.
>>>
>>> On the other hand, there's no legislation authorizing the NSA to
>>> maintain a database of every single phone call made within the
>>> United States, and it seems like a ridiculous scheme that no
>>> politician would expect to get away with.
>>
>> Now for the reality.
>>
>> http://www.rfidjournal.com/article/articleview/1951/1/1/
>> --
>> Drop the alphabet for email 
Technical Details
Message-ID: <4cknp2F15trgjU1@individual.net>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
References: <bearclaw-55827C.00545608052006@sn-indi.vsrv-sjc.supernews.net> <7OSdnZzIH7gGj_zZnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@comcast.com> <bearclaw-E3FD11.15334910052006@sn-indi.vsrv-sjc.supernews.net> <ZYSdncwymLGq3v7ZRVn-sw@comcast.com> <MPG.1eccfdaf6628439198972c@newsgroups.comcast.net> <1ksnfkieaosro.186oh2btlmb8f$.dlg@40tude.net> <e436um$3j2@news.icubed.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10f73f,84abdb9b21b74b28
X-Google-Thread: 106595,84abdb9b21b74b28
X-Google-Thread: 107518,84abdb9b21b74b28
X-Google-Thread: f6c48,84abdb9b21b74b28
X-Google-Attributes: gid10f73f,gid106595,gid107518,gidf6c48,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.consumers,ba.consumers,misc.consumers,misc.consumers.frugal-living
Subject: Re: U.S. National Identity Card (RFID) Coming in 2008
Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 10:30:55 +1000
Lines: 69
Message-ID: <4cknp2F15trgjU1@individual.net>
References: <bearclaw-55827C.00545608052006@sn-indi.vsrv-sjc.supernews.net> <7OSdnZzIH7gGj_zZnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@comcast.com> <bearclaw-E3FD11.15334910052006@sn-indi.vsrv-sjc.supernews.net> <ZYSdncwymLGq3v7ZRVn-sw@comcast.com> <MPG.1eccfdaf6628439198972c@newsgroups.comcast.net> <1ksnfkieaosro.186oh2btlmb8f$.dlg@40tude.net> <e436um$3j2@news.icubed.com>
X-Trace: individual.net LujhfKPs6sSgNLzuBUEeiA79yHtQjB7D8WtkLokVkHL5peUVc=
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2670
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response