Article View: alt.consumers
Article #708Re: U.S. National Identity Card (RFID) Coming in 2008
From: Rod Speed
Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 00:30
Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 00:30
67 lines
3532 bytes
3532 bytes
Newsgroup <janedoe@icubed.com> wrote > I've been very concerned with RFID technology. So much so, that when given an > opportunity to research the subject during a graduate class, I took it. Here's the > basics of what I learned: You failed. > RFID is simply a number or ID on a card. It can be quite a bit more than just that. The data can be included too. > This ID number can be read by an RFID reader. The ID in itself means absolutely > nothing. That > ID linked to a database means everything. Its more complicated than that. > As long as the security of the database is good and the ID is not a combination of > identifiable > information, then RFID is not a security risk. Depends on how its used. Its obviously theoretically possible to clone an RFID so that it will fool a system that is looking for that particular ID. > The readers have issues though. Water, such as rain makes accurate readings difficult. > Remember, that the "RF" in RFID is radio frequency. Water disrupts radio waves. Thats not true in a practical sense with most use of RFID. > Distance is an issue too. They have very short accurate distances. It aint that short. > The other major issue which will decrease in time, is the cost of the readers. They are > extremely expensive. No they arent. > Short answer is the ID is meaningless without the link to the data. Gross over simplication. > There are still technical and cost issues that need to be overcome to make it > consistantly accurate and cost effective. Wrong. > Ari Silverstein <abcarisilverstein@yahoo.comxyz> wrote >> Joshua Putnam wrote >>> On one hand, nothing in the cited legislation says anything about >>> RFID, and RFID tracking seems like a ridiculous proposal that no >>> politician would expect to get away with. >>> >>> On the other hand, there's no legislation authorizing the NSA to >>> maintain a database of every single phone call made within the >>> United States, and it seems like a ridiculous scheme that no >>> politician would expect to get away with. >> >> Now for the reality. >> >> http://www.rfidjournal.com/article/articleview/1951/1/1/ >> -- >> Drop the alphabet for email
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4cknp2F15trgjU1@individual.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mailReferences:
<bearclaw-55827C.00545608052006@sn-indi.vsrv-sjc.supernews.net> <7OSdnZzIH7gGj_zZnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@comcast.com> <bearclaw-E3FD11.15334910052006@sn-indi.vsrv-sjc.supernews.net> <ZYSdncwymLGq3v7ZRVn-sw@comcast.com> <MPG.1eccfdaf6628439198972c@newsgroups.comcast.net> <1ksnfkieaosro.186oh2btlmb8f$.dlg@40tude.net> <e436um$3j2@news.icubed.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10f73f,84abdb9b21b74b28 X-Google-Thread: 106595,84abdb9b21b74b28 X-Google-Thread: 107518,84abdb9b21b74b28 X-Google-Thread: f6c48,84abdb9b21b74b28 X-Google-Attributes: gid10f73f,gid106595,gid107518,gidf6c48,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> Newsgroups: alt.consumers,ba.consumers,misc.consumers,misc.consumers.frugal-living Subject: Re: U.S. National Identity Card (RFID) Coming in 2008 Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 10:30:55 +1000 Lines: 69 Message-ID: <4cknp2F15trgjU1@individual.net> References: <bearclaw-55827C.00545608052006@sn-indi.vsrv-sjc.supernews.net> <7OSdnZzIH7gGj_zZnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@comcast.com> <bearclaw-E3FD11.15334910052006@sn-indi.vsrv-sjc.supernews.net> <ZYSdncwymLGq3v7ZRVn-sw@comcast.com> <MPG.1eccfdaf6628439198972c@newsgroups.comcast.net> <1ksnfkieaosro.186oh2btlmb8f$.dlg@40tude.net> <e436um$3j2@news.icubed.com> X-Trace: individual.net LujhfKPs6sSgNLzuBUEeiA79yHtQjB7D8WtkLokVkHL5peUVc= X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2670 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response