Science or Nonsense?

Thread View: alt.consumers

5 messages

[T] Back to Threads [V] Tree View [G] Group Articles

5 total messages Started by bearclaw Fri, 13 Oct 2006 16:48

#356

Author: bearclaw
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 16:48

10 lines
1367 bytes

Which will we choose?

In "Warcraft" terms, "Our science is under attack!"

<http://www.defendscience.org/statement.html>

-- 
"I wear boots when I play that ol' squeezebox
 Stompin' out rhythms
 'till the headstones dance on their graves"

Re: Science or Nonsense?

#357

Author: Jake
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 17:56

16 lines
1896 bytes

A book titled "Darwin's Leap of Faith" ISBN 1-56507-657-5 shows many 
examples of science being manipulated and betrayed.


<bearclaw@cruller.invalid> wrote in message 
news:bearclaw-E9FC71.11482013102006@news.supernews.com...
> Which will we choose?
>
> In "Warcraft" terms, "Our science is under attack!"
>
> <http://www.defendscience.org/statement.html>
>
> -- 
> "I wear boots when I play that ol' squeezebox
> Stompin' out rhythms
> 'till the headstones dance on their graves"

Re: Science or Nonsense?

#358

Author: cjorp
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 08:21

24 lines
2368 bytes

Jake wrote:
> <bearclaw@cruller.invalid> wrote in message
> news:bearclaw-E9FC71.11482013102006@news.supernews.com...
> > Which will we choose?
> >
> > In "Warcraft" terms, "Our science is under attack!"
> >
> > <http://www.defendscience.org/statement.html>
>
> A book titled "Darwin's Leap of Faith" ISBN 1-56507-657-5 shows many
> examples of science being manipulated and betrayed.

That book is awful.  The author clearly has no idea what he's talking
about.  Granted, I stopped reading after the first few pages, when he'd
already buried himself under horrible arguments, and put it back on the
shelves.

That said, it is easy to defend evolutionary theory in any case.  I've
never seen a good argument against it.  Behe's certainly isn't.

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-misconceptions.html#proof

-- 
C

Re: Science or Nonsense?

#359

Author: cjorp
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 08:23

13 lines
1735 bytes

bearclaw@cruller.invalid wrote:
> Which will we choose?
>
> In "Warcraft" terms, "Our science is under attack!"
>
> <http://www.defendscience.org/statement.html>

You might want one of these:

http://www.supportourscientists.com

-- 
C

Re: Science or Nonsense?

#360

Author: lee
Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 14:47

10 lines
1762 bytes

Scott en Aztlán wrote:
> bearclaw@cruller.invalid said in misc.consumers:
>
> >Which will we choose?
> >
> >In "Warcraft" terms, "Our science is under attack!"
> >
> ><http://www.defendscience.org/statement.html>
> 
> Daa Boo.

Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads