Thread View: alt.consumers
4 messages
4 total messages
Started by bearclaw
Sun, 09 Sep 2007 10:58
RFID chip implants solidly linked to animal tumors
Author: bearclaw
Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2007 10:58
Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2007 10:58
20 lines
2178 bytes
2178 bytes
According to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, these chip implants are not only safe, they will save lives by allowing the human bearer to effortlessly carry his entire medical history around with him wherever he goes. Indeed, the FDA assurances sound almost *exactly* like the chip manufacturer's sales literature, but with the added ring of "authority". The chips were enthusiastically endorsed by the agency during the Bush appointment of Tommy Thompson, Republican from Wisconsin, working in concert with Jim Sennsenbrenner, Republican Congressman also from Wisconsin, who also peddled the chips his so-called "Real I.D." Act (HR 418). So why won't the FDA divulge to the press exactly *which* studies it reviewed to make this assessment? What's the big secret, FDA? Is it that a Federal Agency obligated to protect the American people has happily, blithely approved a passive surveillance device which is now shown to nourish malignent cell growth in microchipped animals? I wonder if Thompson and Sennsenbrenner have had their pets or children injected with these things? <http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5hYssebw3_FRuof2bdR1YdCo8OgXA>
Re: RFID chip implants solidly linked to animal tumors
Author: ultimauw
Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2007 20:44
Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2007 20:44
6 lines
1750 bytes
1750 bytes
On Sep 9, 3:58 am, bearc...@cruller.invalid wrote: > According to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, these chip implants > are not only safe, they will save lives by allowing the human bearer to > effortlessly carry his entire medical history around with him wherever They can chip my cold, dead, lifeless body.
Re: RFID chip implants solidly linked to animal tumors
Author: ultimauw
Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2007 20:45
Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2007 20:45
23 lines
2810 bytes
2810 bytes
On Sep 9, 3:58 am, bearc...@cruller.invalid wrote: > According to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, these chip implants > are not only safe, they will save lives by allowing the human bearer to > effortlessly carry his entire medical history around with him wherever > he goes. Indeed, the FDA assurances sound almost *exactly* like the chip > manufacturer's sales literature, but with the added ring of "authority". > The chips were enthusiastically endorsed by the agency during the Bush > appointment of Tommy Thompson, Republican from Wisconsin, working in > concert with Jim Sennsenbrenner, Republican Congressman also from > Wisconsin, who also peddled the chips his so-called "Real I.D." Act (HR > 418). > > So why won't the FDA divulge to the press exactly *which* studies it > reviewed to make this assessment? What's the big secret, FDA? Is it that > a Federal Agency obligated to protect the American people has happily, > blithely approved a passive surveillance device which is now shown to > nourish malignent cell growth in microchipped animals? I wonder if > Thompson and Sennsenbrenner have had their pets or children injected > with these things? > > <http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5hYssebw3_FRuof2bdR1YdCo8OgXA> They can chip my cold, dead, lifeless body.
Re: RFID chip implants solidly linked to animal tumors
Author: Jeff Jonas
Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2007 23:53
Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2007 23:53
6 lines
1208 bytes
1208 bytes
> They can chip my cold, dead, lifeless body. Already common practice, particularly in disasters such as Katrina. -- -- mejeep deMeep ferret!
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads