Article View: alt.dcom.telecom
Article #437Re: SBC & Remote Access Call Forwarding
From: kenji
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 18:18
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 18:18
6 lines
1333 bytes
1333 bytes
In article <KUiCc.902$LC7.807@newssvr15.news.prodigy.com>, Steve Kraus <screen@SPAMBLOCKfilmteknik.com> wrote: > When did SBC abolish remote access call forwarding* and why? I have XO for my biz lines just for this reason.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<230620041318580943%kenji@ameritech.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!newsfeed3.easynews.com!newsfeed1.easynews.com!easynews.com!easynews!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!news.mbo.net!gail.ripco.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<KUiCc.902$LC7.807@newssvr15.news.prodigy.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1126ff,b62b9eac4b9d9ad6 X-Google-Thread: 10e835,b62b9eac4b9d9ad6 X-Google-Attributes: gid1126ff,gid10e835,public Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!newsfeed3.easynews.com!newsfeed1.easynews.com!easynews.com!easynews!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!news.mbo.net!gail.ripco.com!not-for-mail From: kenji <kenji@ameritech.net> Newsgroups: alt.dcom.telecom,chi.general Subject: Re: SBC & Remote Access Call Forwarding Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 13:18:58 -0500 Organization: Ftupet Inc., A Divison of CMC Lines: 6 Message-ID: <230620041318580943%kenji@ameritech.net> References: <KUiCc.902$LC7.807@newssvr15.news.prodigy.com> Reply-To: yobubba@ameritech.net NNTP-Posting-Host: 216.146.78.166 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: e250.ripco.com 1088015403 22644 216.146.78.166 (23 Jun 2004 18:30:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ripco.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 18:30:03 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Thoth/1.7.1 (Carbon/OS X)