🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Thread View: alt.dcom.telecom
6 messages
6 total messages Started by Barrett Communications Wed, 14 Aug 1996 00:00
determine phone answered electronically
#452
Author: Barrett Communications
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 1996 00:00
26 lines
1665 bytes
I am looking for means of determining if a person has picked answered a
phone (normal analogue).  

As far as I know there are three means for
determining if the phone has been answered.  The first two I have covered,
the last I no nothing about.  

1) Lack of busy or ring signals from a call
progress detector chip.  However this can take upto 5 seconds to determine
there is a lack of 'RING'.  

2) Subscriber Pulse Meter (SPM).  Where
telecom sends a 'charge pulse' every unit interval down the line to
indicate to 'charge' for that interval.  The pulse is usually a burst of
12 or 16kHz tone, and is easily detected by a SPM chip.  This however is
not available in all countries.  

3) Line Reversal?  There is meant to be a
polarity change on the tip and ring inputs as soon as the phone is picked
up?  Does anyone know anything about this and/or how to measure it?  Also
may not be available in all countries?  

Any help appreciated,

Damian
Re: determine phone answered electronically
#453
Author: Simon Watkins
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 1996 00:00
39 lines
1988 bytes
barrett@opera.iinet.net.au (Barrett Communications) wrote:
>I am looking for means of determining if a person has picked answered a
>phone (normal analogue).  
>
>As far as I know there are three means for
>determining if the phone has been answered.  The first two I have covered,
>the last I no nothing about.  
>
>


[snip]
  
>
>3) Line Reversal?  There is meant to be a
>polarity change on the tip and ring inputs as soon as the phone is picked
>up?  Does anyone know anything about this and/or how to measure it?  Also
>may not be available in all countries?  
>
>Any help appreciated,
>
>Damian


Try having a look in the old in BS6450:Part 1 spec.

I believe it used to talk about (I may be wrong !) 
something yo do with an answer signal returned 
from the exchange, so that a
PBX knew that the outgoing call had been answered. Is this the
sort of thing you are looking for ? Or do you want to
know if an incoming call was answered succesfully
before the caller gave up and hung up ?

If the latter is true, I would be interested in hearing
a way of doing it, if you find you are successful.

Simon Watkins        email simon_watkins@nt.com
Re: determine phone answered electronically
#454
Author: David Lesher
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 1996 00:00
23 lines
1676 bytes
Simon Watkins <simon_watkins@nt.com> writes:

>barrett@opera.iinet.net.au (Barrett Communications) wrote:
>>I am looking for means of determining if a person has picked answered a
>>phone (normal analogue).  

In the US, this is termed "supervision"...

There is no reliable supervision back to the originating
line, with one exception.

In some locales, CPC [a momentary drop in loop current is
offered up on disconnection. But depending on it is a bad idea.

The exception is ISDN. It does provide full supervision.


-- 
A host is a host from coast to coast.................wb8foz@nrk.com
& no one will talk to a host that's close...........(v)301 56 LINUX
Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433
is busy, hung or dead........vr vr vr vr.................20915-1433
Re: determine phone answered electronically
#455
Author: Al Varney
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 1996 00:00
34 lines
2281 bytes
In article <wb8fozDw6tDt.BLF@netcom.com>,
David Lesher <wb8foz@netcom.com> wrote:
>Simon Watkins <simon_watkins@nt.com> writes:
>
>>barrett@opera.iinet.net.au (Barrett Communications) wrote:
>>>I am looking for means of determining if a person has picked answered a
>>>phone (normal analogue).  

   I assume you want to detect answer from a different calling telephone,
not by monitoring the called line....

>In the US, this is termed "supervision"...
>
>There is no reliable supervision back to the originating
>line, with one exception.
>
>In some locales, CPC [a momentary drop in loop current is
>offered up on disconnection. But depending on it is a bad idea.
>
>The exception is ISDN. It does provide full supervision.

   I think ISDN is ideal (and fast) for this application.  But there is
another standard method available ONLY on analog 2-wire lines.  The feature
is called "Answer Supervision - Line Side" by some TELCos; we called it
"Calling Line-Side Supervision" on the 5ESS-2000 switch.  The interface is
simple - Tip/Ring battery & ground are reversed when the called party goes
off-hook and reversed again when the called party goes on-hook.  The line
is restricted to virtually NO features, and may not be compatible with
some out-side plant equipment (pair-gain devices).  It's also unlikely
to be tariffed as a residential feature, and only available on selected
switches....

Al Varney - just my opinion
Re: determine phone answered electronically
#456
Author: Simon C. Allen
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 1996 00:00
24 lines
1742 bytes
In article <4urbmp$7el@opera.iinet.net.au>, Barrett Communications
<barrett@opera.iinet.net.au> writes
>I am looking for means of determining if a person has picked answered a
>phone (normal analogue).  
>
TOTAL SNIP
It may not be of much help but - when you use Hg on indirect, you get a
tone signal on answer.  I have used this successfully to get credits
from them when I have heard the beep - but no connection.  Subsequent
checking of account proved I was billed.

This tone can be supressed on request and might (?) be available on
direct connect calls.

In the early days of my relationship with the lady with whom I now share
my life - she knew it was me calling because none of her other friends
used Hg.  For some time I was called 'Beep'.  (Just a diversion, it must
be the silly season and the temperature tomorrow is going to be well
into the 70s!)

Voice Systems Specialist 
Simon C. Allen
+44 (0)1442 842702
Re: determine phone answered electronically
#457
Author: Volkmar Gross
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 1996 00:00
34 lines
2334 bytes
 
Im Artikel <4urbmp$7el@opera.iinet.net.au>, Barrett Communications (barrett@opera.iinet.net.au) schreibt
>I am looking for means of determining if a person has picked answered a
>phone (normal analogue).  


>3) Line Reversal?  There is meant to be a
>polarity change on the tip and ring inputs as soon as the phone is picked
>up?  Does anyone know anything about this and/or how to measure it?  Also
>may not be available in all countries?  

I understand this was (is?) only applied to local call metering; LD is always
12 or 16 kHz. Anyway, if you experience polarity change you are in a local
net where polarity change meters are availlable from your telco or at a phone 
shop. Just tap the circuit of the meter, e.g. the coil of the electromechanical 
display.

Kind regards,   Volkmar

--
Volkmar Gross,  Softwork Telematica
Grundstrasse 3, Bremen/Germany        
Phone & Fax +49 421 74434            ("`-''-/").___..--''"`-._         
http://www.winnet.de/home/softwork/   `6_ 6  )   `-.  (     ).`-.__.`)
           o__                        (_Y_.)'  ._   )  `._ `. ``-..-'  
          _,>/�_                    _..`--'_..-_/  /--'_.' ,'          
         (*) \(*) ))               (il),-''  (li),'  ((!.-'            
'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,.
My GSM bill kills me! D1,D2,E+,C-Netz: Mobile Callback by FASTNET UK
Thanks for email, or psychoanalysis in advance
Free advice may prove worth what you pay for it.
Aus unserer Reihe "Informatik einfach erklaert":
>objektorientiert< == "Den Code habe ich von meinen Vorfahren geerbt."
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads