Thread View: alt.destroy.the.earth
5 messages
5 total messages
Started by Karl R Peters
Tue, 27 Oct 1992 10:39
Realism vs. fun
Author: Karl R Peters
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 1992 10:39
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 1992 10:39
6 lines
675 bytes
675 bytes
Well, now that we've shown that we can't blow up the earth realistically... How would we do it UNREALISTICALLY? I think opening a space/time portal connecting the center of the sun to Washington DC would be effective. :-) Karl
Re: Realism vs. fun
Author: Jason D Corley
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 1992 18:27
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 1992 18:27
9 lines
992 bytes
992 bytes
In article <1992Oct27.103909.19015@athena.mit.edu> krpeters@athena.mit.edu (Karl R Peters) writes: >Well, now that we've shown that we can't blow up the earth realistically... >How would we do it UNREALISTICALLY? >I think opening a space/time portal connecting the center of the sun >to Washington DC would be effective. >:-) > Karl NO YOU FOOL! Do you want to destroy the Sun or the Earth?????
Re: Realism vs. fun
Author: Karl R Peters
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1992 14:53
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1992 14:53
12 lines
1168 bytes
1168 bytes
In article <1992Oct27.182719.10193@organpipe.uug.arizona.edu> corleyj@helium.gas.uug.arizona.edu (Jason D Corley ) writes: >In article <1992Oct27.103909.19015@athena.mit.edu> krpeters@athena.mit.edu (Karl R Peters) writes: >>Well, now that we've shown that we can't blow up the earth realistically... >>How would we do it UNREALISTICALLY? >>I think opening a space/time portal connecting the center of the sun >>to Washington DC would be effective. >>:-) >> Karl > >NO YOU FOOL! Do you want to destroy the Sun or the Earth????? Well, why not blow up both? :)
Re: Realism vs. fun
Author: Pete Ashdown
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1992 19:21
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1992 19:21
14 lines
1071 bytes
1071 bytes
krpeters@athena.mit.edu (Karl R Peters) writes: >>NO YOU FOOL! Do you want to destroy the Sun or the Earth????? >Well, why not blow up both? :) If we blow up the sun, we get the added bonus of blowing up the earth as well! Now maybe this is an alternate route that would actually be easier than attempting to destroy the earth. How can we reduce the stability of the sun? -- "I'm Slash man, Slash!" - Slash DISCLAIMER: My writings have NOTHING to do with my employer. Keep it that way. Pete Ashdown pashdown@slack.sim.es.com ...uunet!slack.sim.es.com!pashdown
Re: Realism vs. fun
Author: Swo Odwar
Date: Sun, 01 Nov 1992 04:39
Date: Sun, 01 Nov 1992 04:39
16 lines
1089 bytes
1089 bytes
krpeters@athena.mit.edu (Karl R Peters) had the unmitigated audacity to say:
>Well, now that we've shown that we can't blow up the earth realistically...
>How would we do it UNREALISTICALLY?
>I think opening a space/time portal connecting the center of the sun
>to Washington DC would be effective.
>:-)
> Karl
Hey, did someone post a physics article or something? Well anyway, the
name of the newsgroup is alt.destroy.the.earth, so why don't we just
destroy it without blowing it up? Or is the definition of "destroy"
based on blowing things up?
--
OHTFOHTFOHTFOHTFOHTFOHTFOHTFOHTFOHTFOHTFOHTFOHTFOHTFOHTFOHTFOHTFOHTFOHTFOHTF
guvf vf zl arj ebg guvegrra fvt. ubcr lbh yvxr vg.
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads