Thread View: alt.destroy.the.earth
5 messages
5 total messages
Started by RSJ107
Fri, 22 Jan 1993 20:20
a better use for excess energy
Author: RSJ107
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 20:20
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 20:20
16 lines
1312 bytes
1312 bytes
If we had something orbiting the Earth collecting enough energy to do most
anything, the first thing we would have to do is heat up Mars. You see, then
we could send all the "undesirable" people from this planet to a colony on
Mars. We could also send all of our refuse there, leaving Earth as a
beautiful gleaming ball of steel and glass floating through space.
Next, we could use the energy to power a huge computer the size of Butte,
Montana that was completely automated and could construct robots, machines,
and other computers to do any physical labor so the human race could spend more
time learning how to become more dangerous. We have to work faster at
conquering the light barrier, or at least find a way to make interstellar
travel much easier. That way we can explore other planets, and hopefully find
new life forms to enslave or exterminate.
The Future Could Be A Better Place
Nexroth
Re: a better use for excess energy
Author: GNR100
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 14:38
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 14:38
5 lines
638 bytes
638 bytes
Send all the undesireable people to Mars? Nice thought,
but Mars isn't big enough! It would be more practical to relocate
those few that still have some decency. That should only take
a couple trips.
gnr100@psuvm.psu.edu
Re: a better use for excess energy
Author: RSJ107
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 21:11
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 21:11
12 lines
1137 bytes
1137 bytes
The fact that Mars isn't big enough is the whole point. Everyone there
will be overcrowded and miserable, as they deserve. Plus we, the worthy, won't
have to go through the trouble of packing our shit and leaving; they will.
To make things worse for them, their environment will be much more hostile than
ours, causing an incredible number of fatalities. The Law of the Jungle (or
in this case, Wasteland) will take effect, and in a few hundred years they
might even be worthy of our communications. Besides, we're not trying to
"conserve" anything by reducing the number of trips, are we? The cost involved
would be well worth it.
Nexroth
Re: a better use for excess energy
Author: BILLY JOE BISSETTE
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 02:14
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 02:14
13 lines
1301 bytes
1301 bytes
You sound as if you want to mastermind this whole plot, to sit back and have everyone work for you! What gives you the right to rule, nay, the right to live? You think you don't deserve to die with everyone else? You want to outlive everyone and everything? Heresy, it is heresy! I banish thee back to alt.slack where you shalt remember how to ask "Give me $20 or kill me," and someone from alt.destroy.the.earth will kill you... Everyone and everything must be taken out, it is the nature of destruction. There is no such thing as the worthy... PS: Speaking of $20, the "Raise A Great Old One Foundation" is in need of funds. Please send $20 dollars so that I can order a plush, adorable Cthulhu which I can raise for the followers...Gotta keep the faith....8)
Re: a better use for excess energy
Author: Dave Gordon
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 19:20
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 19:20
25 lines
1672 bytes
1672 bytes
In <93022.152027RSJ107@psuvm.psu.edu> <RSJ107@psuvm.psu.edu> writes: > > If we had something orbiting the Earth collecting enough energy to do most >anything, the first thing we would have to do is heat up Mars. You see, then Here we go again: Collecting enough energy to "heat up a planet" requires an *enormous* surface area; even more if the mirrors are in Mars orbit (it's about twice the distance from the sun, so the sunlight is four times as diffuse), and I think there might be problems "forwarding" sunlight from Earth orbit (like keeping it on target). See my last post for calculations on heating up the Earth, then see if you can work out how much mirror surface you're going to need to heat up Mars (say by 50K or so). Then remember that you'll actually need more, because radiative losses to space are not negligible; in fact, with a planet in equilibrium, heat lost through radiation must *equal* total insolation. -- =============================================================================== Dave | dsg@imp.co.uk | +44 753 516599 | I am not a .sig virus, I am a free bug! ===============================================================================
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads