🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Thread View: alt.destroy.the.earth
5 messages
5 total messages Started by RSJ107 Fri, 22 Jan 1993 20:20
a better use for excess energy
#356
Author: RSJ107
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 20:20
16 lines
1312 bytes
    If we had something orbiting the Earth collecting enough energy to do most
anything, the first thing we would have to do is heat up Mars.  You see, then
we could send all the "undesirable" people from this planet to a colony on
Mars.  We could also send all of our refuse there, leaving Earth as a
beautiful gleaming ball of steel and glass floating through space.
    Next, we could use the energy to power a huge computer the size of Butte,
Montana that was completely automated and could construct robots, machines,
and other computers to do any physical labor so the human race could spend more
time learning how to become more dangerous.  We have to work faster at
conquering the light barrier, or at least find a way to make interstellar
travel much easier.  That way we can explore other planets, and hopefully find
new life forms to enslave or exterminate.

                                    The Future Could Be A Better Place

                                                   Nexroth
Re: a better use for excess energy
#363
Author: GNR100
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 14:38
5 lines
638 bytes
       Send all the undesireable people to Mars?  Nice thought,
 but Mars isn't big enough!  It would be more practical to relocate
 those few that still have some decency.  That should only take
 a couple trips.
                                 gnr100@psuvm.psu.edu
Re: a better use for excess energy
#370
Author: RSJ107
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 21:11
12 lines
1137 bytes
    The fact that Mars isn't big enough is the whole point.  Everyone there
will be overcrowded and miserable, as they deserve.  Plus we, the worthy, won't
have to go through the trouble of packing our shit and leaving; they will.
To make things worse for them, their environment will be much more hostile than
ours, causing an incredible number of fatalities.  The Law of the Jungle (or
in this case, Wasteland) will take effect, and in a few hundred years they
might even be worthy of our communications.  Besides, we're not trying to
"conserve" anything by reducing the number of trips, are we?  The cost involved
would be well worth it.

                                        Nexroth
Re: a better use for excess energy
#368
Author: BILLY JOE BISSETTE
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 02:14
13 lines
1301 bytes
  You sound as if you want to mastermind this whole plot, to sit back and have
everyone work for you!  What gives you the right to rule, nay, the right to
live?  You think you don't deserve to die with everyone else?  You want to
outlive everyone and everything?  Heresy, it is heresy!  I banish thee back to
alt.slack where you shalt remember how to ask "Give me $20 or kill me," and
someone from alt.destroy.the.earth will kill you...  Everyone and everything
must be taken out, it is the nature of destruction.  There is no such thing as
the worthy...

PS: Speaking of $20, the "Raise A Great Old One Foundation" is in need of funds.
Please send $20 dollars so that I can order a plush, adorable Cthulhu which I
can raise for the followers...Gotta keep the faith....8)
Re: a better use for excess energy
#365
Author: Dave Gordon
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 19:20
25 lines
1672 bytes
In <93022.152027RSJ107@psuvm.psu.edu> <RSJ107@psuvm.psu.edu> writes:
>
>    If we had something orbiting the Earth collecting enough energy to do most
>anything, the first thing we would have to do is heat up Mars.  You see, then

Here we go again:
	Collecting enough energy to "heat up a planet" requires an
	*enormous* surface area; even more if the mirrors are in Mars
	orbit (it's about twice the distance from the sun, so the
	sunlight is four times as diffuse), and I think there might
	be problems "forwarding" sunlight from Earth orbit (like
	keeping it on target).

See my last post for calculations on heating up the Earth, then see
if you can work out how much mirror surface you're going to need to
heat up Mars (say by 50K or so).

Then remember that you'll actually need more, because radiative losses
to space are not negligible; in fact, with a planet in equilibrium,
heat lost through radiation must *equal* total insolation.
-- 

===============================================================================
Dave | dsg@imp.co.uk | +44 753 516599 | I am not a .sig virus, I am a free bug!
===============================================================================
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads