🚀 go-pugleaf

Dunc wrote:
> 
> Tom Bradley wrote:
> >
> > Gandalf wrote:
> > >
> > > Tom Bradley (t.j.bradley@dur.ac.uk) wrote:
> > > : > : > And Yes, Trev, Tom and Braddas I do know what I just wrote.
> > > : >
> > > : > : That's unfair, why does my name still get on this list.  I have not
> > > : > : implied anything really bad for at least a week.  Am I just stuck with
> > > : > : this bad reputation.
> > > : >
> > > : > I envented that particular rumour[1] by the way Kate, it bears no
> > > : > resemblance to what you might call reality
> > > : >
> > > : > [1] the roadrunner one
> > >
> > > : Is this reality different to what the rest of us may call reality??
> > >
> > > This is a purely hypothetcial reality in which existance is a supposition
> > > of cups of heavily sugared black coffee
> > Suger in coffee is B&R
> >
> It depends on the coffee. A nice cup of real stuff doesn't need it. If
> you after stay awake silly instant then it can make it drinkable and add
> to the stimulant effect with a sugar rush.
> 
OK restaurant coffee needs lots of sugar, otherwise it can do without
and taste better
-- 
Everyone here hates everyone here
For doing the same thing that they do.

Less Than Jake