Thread View: alt.dur.test
142 messages
142 total messages
Page 1 of 3
Started by Trev
Fri, 27 Oct 2000 14:13
Page 1 of 3 • 142 total messages
John Cusack
Author: Trev
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 14:13
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 14:13
6 lines
1099 bytes
1099 bytes
He's not that nice, really. Sure, we'd all like to be him in 'Grosse Pointe Blank' but lets face it, really he's a bit of a muppet. -- Trev - bored and stirring it.
Re: John Cusack
Author: Jamz Rhodes
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 18:52
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 18:52
21 lines
1639 bytes
1639 bytes
Dolphin wrote: > > "J.R.Smith2" wrote: > > > > Kate wrote: > > > > > > > Five if James Rhodes does the right thing ;-) > > > > > > You'll confuse everyone calling him that. Dolphin will probably be > > > showing that just after he shows the Tremmors double bill. > > > > Would it confuse _him_? Now that would be impressive. > > James Rhodes? > > Who he? I claim this goat in the name of New Zealand.
Re: John Cusack
Author: Dolphin
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 19:07
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 19:07
28 lines
1816 bytes
1816 bytes
Jamz Rhodes wrote: > > Dolphin wrote: > > > > "J.R.Smith2" wrote: > > > > > > Kate wrote: > > > > > > > > > Five if James Rhodes does the right thing ;-) > > > > > > > > You'll confuse everyone calling him that. Dolphin will probably be > > > > showing that just after he shows the Tremmors double bill. > > > > > > Would it confuse _him_? Now that would be impressive. > > > > James Rhodes? > > > > Who he? > > I claim this goat in the name of New Zealand. No you bloody well don't ! He's all mine. </sinister>
Re: John Cusack
Author: Dolphin
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 19:10
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 19:10
31 lines
2005 bytes
2005 bytes
Dunc wrote: > > A J Knighton wrote: > > > > Kate (K.J.Dobson@durham.ac.uk) wrote: > > : > > > : > Evil will _not_ win!!!! > > > > : Yes it will. I'm on your side. > > > > That's really not the point. Evil will win because it is more stylish > > than good in any instance. Now all you have to do is work out whether it > > is more stylish to watch the film this whole argument was about or > > whatever alternative we might see instead. Then it will be resolved. > > > > I think. > > > > Actually, I'e lost myself somewhere in the semantics there. If anyone can > > find the point I'd be grateful. > > > Here it is. > Dunc pokes Andy with the point. > DUNC!! Hello. Playing tonight? Might be on for an hour or four.
Re: John Cusack
Author: J.R.Smith2
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 19:12
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 19:12
30 lines
1968 bytes
1968 bytes
Dunc wrote: > > Kate wrote: > > > > > > > > > [John Cusack] > > > > > > > He just rules. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Although not as much as Alan Rickman. > > > > > > > > > > > > Neither of them are a patch on Richard Prior. > > > > > > > > > > Who??? > > > > > > > > > He was the guy in 80's comedy classic 'Brewsters Millions'. > > > > > > > > Everybody has seen this film at least four times. > > > > > > > > > > Five if James Rhodes does the right thing ;-) > > > > You'll confuse everyone calling him that. Dolphin will probably be > > showing that just after he shows the Tremmors double bill. > > > I still haven't seen Tremors 2. I definitely haven't seen Tremmors or > any sequel. :P > I also haven't seen Brewster's Millions, but I don't want to. Philistine.
Re: John Cusack
Author: Gandalf
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 19:21
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 19:21
14 lines
1458 bytes
1458 bytes
: > : > I claim this goat in the name of New Zealand. NOW LOOK HERE! THIS IS A RESPECTABLE NEWSGROUP FOR RESPECTABLE PEOPLE WE WON'T HAVE ANY MORE TALK OF GOATS ROUND'ERE -- "But look at us now, quit driving. Some things hurt more, much more than cars and girls. But look at us now, start counting, what adds up the way it did when we were young?" Prefab Sprout
Re: John Cusack
Author: Dolphin
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 19:23
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 19:23
14 lines
1395 bytes
1395 bytes
Gandalf wrote: > > : > > : > I claim this goat in the name of New Zealand. > > NOW LOOK HERE! > > THIS IS A RESPECTABLE NEWSGROUP FOR RESPECTABLE PEOPLE > > WE WON'T HAVE ANY MORE TALK OF GOATS ROUND'ERE </Kimmy>
Re: John Cusack
Author: Gandalf
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 19:24
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 19:24
21 lines
1552 bytes
1552 bytes
Dolphin (James.Rhodes@durham.ac.uk) wrote: : Gandalf wrote: : > : > : > : > : > I claim this goat in the name of New Zealand. : > : > NOW LOOK HERE! : > : > THIS IS A RESPECTABLE NEWSGROUP FOR RESPECTABLE PEOPLE : > : > WE WON'T HAVE ANY MORE TALK OF GOATS ROUND'ERE : </Kimmy> is it wise to call Kimmy a goat? -- "But look at us now, quit driving. Some things hurt more, much more than cars and girls. But look at us now, start counting, what adds up the way it did when we were young?" Prefab Sprout
Re: John Cusack
Author: J.R.Smith2
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 19:26
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 19:26
23 lines
1579 bytes
1579 bytes
Gandalf wrote: > > Dolphin (James.Rhodes@durham.ac.uk) wrote: > > : Gandalf wrote: > : > > : > : > > : > : > I claim this goat in the name of New Zealand. > : > > : > NOW LOOK HERE! > : > > : > THIS IS A RESPECTABLE NEWSGROUP FOR RESPECTABLE PEOPLE > : > > : > WE WON'T HAVE ANY MORE TALK OF GOATS ROUND'ERE > > : </Kimmy> > > is it wise to call Kimmy a goat? > This has goat to stop!
Re: John Cusack
Author: Dolphin
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 19:28
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 19:28
32 lines
1864 bytes
1864 bytes
"J.R.Smith2" wrote: > > Gandalf wrote: > > > > Dolphin (James.Rhodes@durham.ac.uk) wrote: > > > > : Gandalf wrote: > > : > > > : > : > > > : > : > I claim this goat in the name of New Zealand. > > : > > > : > NOW LOOK HERE! > > : > > > : > THIS IS A RESPECTABLE NEWSGROUP FOR RESPECTABLE PEOPLE > > : > > > : > WE WON'T HAVE ANY MORE TALK OF GOATS ROUND'ERE > > > > : </Kimmy> > > > > is it wise to call Kimmy a goat? > > > > This has goat to stop! DISCLAIMER: I, in no way, shape or form suggested, hinted, insinuated, implied or attempted to establish that Kimmy was a goat. It was all Gandalf - :p
Re: John Cusack
Author: J.R.Smith2
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 19:30
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 19:30
36 lines
2052 bytes
2052 bytes
Dolphin wrote: > > "J.R.Smith2" wrote: > > > > Gandalf wrote: > > > > > > Dolphin (James.Rhodes@durham.ac.uk) wrote: > > > > > > : Gandalf wrote: > > > : > > > > : > : > > > > : > : > I claim this goat in the name of New Zealand. > > > : > > > > : > NOW LOOK HERE! > > > : > > > > : > THIS IS A RESPECTABLE NEWSGROUP FOR RESPECTABLE PEOPLE > > > : > > > > : > WE WON'T HAVE ANY MORE TALK OF GOATS ROUND'ERE > > > > > > : </Kimmy> > > > > > > is it wise to call Kimmy a goat? > > > > > > > This has goat to stop! > > DISCLAIMER: > > I, in no way, shape or form suggested, hinted, insinuated, implied or > attempted to establish that Kimmy was a goat. > > It was all Gandalf - :p Don't goat oo far!
Re: John Cusack
Author: Gandalf
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 19:32
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 19:32
30 lines
1952 bytes
1952 bytes
Dolphin (James.Rhodes@durham.ac.uk) wrote: : > > : > : > : > > : > : > I claim this goat in the name of New Zealand. : > > : > : > > : > NOW LOOK HERE! : > > : > : > > : > THIS IS A RESPECTABLE NEWSGROUP FOR RESPECTABLE PEOPLE : > > : > : > > : > WE WON'T HAVE ANY MORE TALK OF GOATS ROUND'ERE : > > : > > : </Kimmy> : > > : > > is it wise to call Kimmy a goat? : > > : > : > This has goat to stop! : DISCLAIMER: : I, in no way, shape or form suggested, hinted, insinuated, implied or : attempted to establish that Kimmy was a goat. : It was all Gandalf - :p And yet dolphin you write that, and I quote "Kimmy was a goat" -- "But look at us now, quit driving. Some things hurt more, much more than cars and girls. But look at us now, start counting, what adds up the way it did when we were young?" Prefab Sprout
Re: John Cusack
Author: Gandalf
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 19:34
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 19:34
28 lines
2023 bytes
2023 bytes
J.R.Smith2 (J.R.Smith2@durham.ac.uk) wrote: : > > > : > WE WON'T HAVE ANY MORE TALK OF GOATS ROUND'ERE : > > > : > > > : </Kimmy> : > > > : > > > is it wise to call Kimmy a goat? : > > > : > > : > > This has goat to stop! : > : > DISCLAIMER: : > : > I, in no way, shape or form suggested, hinted, insinuated, implied or : > attempted to establish that Kimmy was a goat. : > : > It was all Gandalf - :p : Don't goat oo far! away from me evil one - with your hoard of odious puns and your swathe of brightly highlighted notes. Work no more in this one beautiful place lest your eyes should turn back from the horror... I need to get out more I know, but I find it so difficult to meet new people -- "But look at us now, quit driving. Some things hurt more, much more than cars and girls. But look at us now, start counting, what adds up the way it did when we were young?" Prefab Sprout
Re: John Cusack
Author: David Nutter
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 20:49
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 20:49
22 lines
1568 bytes
1568 bytes
HJ Leek <H.J.Leek@durham.ac.uk> writes: > Gandalf wrote: > > > > : I'll let you off. > > > > I won't > > See me in my office after class please Miss Leek > > </dodgy headmaster> > > I's vewwy sowwy Mr Headmaster sir. </sweet, innocent (if twee) child> IT'S POSSESSED! KILL IT! Regards, -david, waving pitchfork -- David Nutter | We Like Zippy! Maybe we could paint GOLDIE HAWN a rich PRUSSIAN BLUE--
Re: John Cusack
Author: Dunc
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 21:21
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 21:21
22 lines
2119 bytes
2119 bytes
"J.R.Smith2" wrote: > > Dolphin wrote: > > > > It was all Gandalf - :p > > Don't goat oo far! Hello, is that the American airforce? I'd like to order a small tactical bomb strike. Just take out the Level three spod room in the Library. You don't kill people for bad puns? Um, it was an Iraqi what done it. Oh good go ahead anytime you like and try not to hit any embassies. -- Dunc - talking to the voices in his head. When they see us coming the birdies all try n hide, But they still go for peanuts when coated in cyanide. -Tom Lehrer
Re: John Cusack
Author: Trev
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 21:24
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 21:24
18 lines
1980 bytes
1980 bytes
On Sun, 29 Oct 2000 21:21:13 +0000, Dunc <Duncan.Taylor@dunelm.org.uk> wrote: >"J.R.Smith2" wrote: >> Dolphin wrote: >> > It was all Gandalf - :p >> Don't goat oo far! >Hello, is that the American airforce? >I'd like to order a small tactical bomb strike. Just take out the Level >three spod room in the Library. >You don't kill people for bad puns? >Um, it was an Iraqi what done it. >Oh good go ahead anytime you like and try not to hit any embassies. Cunning - you know he'll have moved out of the library, so you target it there, knowing they'll miss... -- Trev - thinks you just just send the Assassins in.
Re: John Cusack
Author: Trev
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 21:27
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 21:27
13 lines
1424 bytes
1424 bytes
On Sat, 28 Oct 2000 20:03:45 +0100, Jenny Radcliffe <j.s.radcliffe@dur.ac.uk> wrote: >Trev <trevor.roberts@dunelm.org.uk> wrote >> He's not that nice, really. Sure, we'd all like to be him in >> 'Grosse Pointe Blank' but lets face it, really he's a bit of a muppet. > >No, I'm sorry, he's gorgeous. Well, *I* don't find him attractive at all. -- Trev - wondering if the ITS have got it in for him...
Re: John Cusack
Author: Trev
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 21:31
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 21:31
21 lines
1549 bytes
1549 bytes
On Sat, 28 Oct 2000 16:08:08 +0100, Kate <K.J.Dobson@durham.ac.uk> wrote: > > >Trev wrote: >> >> He's not that nice, really. Sure, we'd all like to be him in >> 'Grosse Pointe Blank' but lets face it, really he's a bit of a muppet. > >He just rules. > >Although not as much as Alan Rickman. Alan Rickman is indeed a god of the highest order, and I shall defend that statement with my life, if necessary. Obviously I'm hoping it *isn't* necessary, but there you go. -- Trev - actually, I'd probably run away.
Re: John Cusack
Author: Trev
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 21:38
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 21:38
12 lines
1372 bytes
1372 bytes
On Sun, 29 Oct 2000 21:27:43 GMT, trevor.roberts@dunelm.org.uk (Trev) wrote: >Trev - wondering if the ITS have got it in for him... > Obviously only when I attempt to start a new thread. How bizarre... /me considers attaching the goats rant to this thread... -- Trev, intrigued...
Re: John Cusack
Author: Dunc
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 21:42
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 21:42
29 lines
2166 bytes
2166 bytes
David Nutter wrote: > > HJ Leek <H.J.Leek@durham.ac.uk> writes: > > > Gandalf wrote: > > > > > > : I'll let you off. > > > > > > I won't > > > See me in my office after class please Miss Leek > > > </dodgy headmaster> > > > > I's vewwy sowwy Mr Headmaster sir. </sweet, innocent (if twee) child> > > IT'S POSSESSED! KILL IT! > > Regards, > > -david, waving pitchfork > Woohoo riot! <Gets burning torch and shotgun> -- Dunc When they see us coming the birdies all try n hide, But they still go for peanuts when coated in cyanide. -Tom Lehrer
Re: John Cusack
Author: Dunc
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 21:44
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 21:44
18 lines
1904 bytes
1904 bytes
Dolphin wrote: > > > DUNC!! > > Hello. Playing tonight? > > Might be on for an hour or four. Me? Online? With my reputation? Er... :) -- Dunc When they see us coming the birdies all try n hide, But they still go for peanuts when coated in cyanide. -Tom Lehrer
Re: John Cusack
Author: Dunc
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 22:22
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 22:22
21 lines
1862 bytes
1862 bytes
Trev wrote: > > On Sat, 28 Oct 2000 20:03:45 +0100, Jenny Radcliffe > <j.s.radcliffe@dur.ac.uk> wrote: > > >Trev <trevor.roberts@dunelm.org.uk> wrote > >> He's not that nice, really. Sure, we'd all like to be him in > >> 'Grosse Pointe Blank' but lets face it, really he's a bit of a muppet. > > > >No, I'm sorry, he's gorgeous. > > Well, *I* don't find him attractive at all. > Oh go on, you know you do really. :) -- Dunc When they see us coming the birdies all try n hide, But they still go for peanuts when coated in cyanide. -Tom Lehrer
Re: John Cusack
Author: Dunc
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 22:23
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 22:23
28 lines
2486 bytes
2486 bytes
Trev wrote: > > On Sun, 29 Oct 2000 21:21:13 +0000, Dunc <Duncan.Taylor@dunelm.org.uk> > wrote: > >"J.R.Smith2" wrote: > >> Dolphin wrote: > >> > It was all Gandalf - :p > >> Don't goat oo far! > >Hello, is that the American airforce? > >I'd like to order a small tactical bomb strike. Just take out the Level > >three spod room in the Library. > >You don't kill people for bad puns? > >Um, it was an Iraqi what done it. > >Oh good go ahead anytime you like and try not to hit any embassies. > > Cunning - you know he'll have moved out of the library, so you > target it there, knowing they'll miss... > Yeah something like that... <brightens> They might hit the New Inn. :) -- Dunc When they see us coming the birdies all try n hide, But they still go for peanuts when coated in cyanide. -Tom Lehrer
Re: John Cusack
Author: Trev
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 22:24
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 22:24
19 lines
1591 bytes
1591 bytes
On Sun, 29 Oct 2000 21:38:40 GMT, trevor.roberts@dunelm.org.uk (Trev) wrote: >On Sun, 29 Oct 2000 21:27:43 GMT, trevor.roberts@dunelm.org.uk (Trev) >wrote: >>Trev - wondering if the ITS have got it in for him... > Obviously only when I attempt to start a new thread. How bizarre... > /me considers attaching the goats rant to this thread... >-- >Trev, intrigued... Coo, now this didn't go through. I think I'll try an experiment... j.s.radcliffe@dur.ac.uk Now we'll see... -- Trev
Re: John Cusack
Author: Trev
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 22:36
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 22:36
16 lines
1812 bytes
1812 bytes
On Sun, 29 Oct 2000 22:23:50 +0000, Dunc <Duncan.Taylor@dunelm.org.uk> wrote: >> Cunning - you know he'll have moved out of the library, so you >> target it there, knowing they'll miss... >> >Yeah something like that... ><brightens> >They might hit the New Inn. :) Yay! But it doesn't really matter to us anymore... But for the good of humanity, yay! -- Trev
Re: John Cusack
Author: Dunc
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 22:36
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 22:36
20 lines
1852 bytes
1852 bytes
Trev wrote: > > On Sun, 29 Oct 2000 21:27:43 GMT, trevor.roberts@dunelm.org.uk (Trev) > wrote: > > >Trev - wondering if the ITS have got it in for him... > > > > Obviously only when I attempt to start a new thread. How bizarre... > > /me considers attaching the goats rant to this thread... > Replying to yourself, first sign of spod overdosing. :) -- Dunc When they see us coming the birdies all try n hide, But they still go for peanuts when coated in cyanide. -Tom Lehrer
Re: John Cusack
Author: Trev
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 22:46
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 22:46
17 lines
1757 bytes
1757 bytes
On Sun, 29 Oct 2000 22:36:11 +0000, Dunc <Duncan.Taylor@dunelm.org.uk> wrote: >Trev wrote: >> On Sun, 29 Oct 2000 21:27:43 GMT, trevor.roberts@dunelm.org.uk (Trev) >> wrote: >> >Trev - wondering if the ITS have got it in for him... >> > >> Obviously only when I attempt to start a new thread. How bizarre... >> /me considers attaching the goats rant to this thread... >Replying to yourself, first sign of spod overdosing. :) I was just testing... I'm beginning to think they just toss a coin every time an external post tries to get in to Durham. Either that or their newsserver is being particularly crap. -- Trev
Re: John Cusack
Author: Trev
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 22:52
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 22:52
11 lines
1590 bytes
1590 bytes
On Sun, 29 Oct 2000 22:46:11 GMT, trevor.roberts@dunelm.org.uk (Trev) wrote: > I was just testing... I'm beginning to think they just toss a coin >every time an external post tries to get in to Durham. Either that or >their newsserver is being particularly crap. They do just toss a coin! Mine got through, yours didn't! I'm not impressed, specially as my goats one hasn't got through. *sigh* -- Trev
Re: John Cusack
Author: HJ Leek
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 23:03
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 23:03
24 lines
1662 bytes
1662 bytes
David Nutter wrote: > > HJ Leek <H.J.Leek@durham.ac.uk> writes: > > > Gandalf wrote: > > > > > > : I'll let you off. > > > > > > I won't > > > See me in my office after class please Miss Leek > > > </dodgy headmaster> > > > > I's vewwy sowwy Mr Headmaster sir. </sweet, innocent (if twee) child> > > IT'S POSSESSED! KILL IT! > You want to hurt me??!! Oo-er... HJ -- We are all dead men on leave. - Eugene Levine
Re: John Cusack
Author: Dunc
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 23:15
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 23:15
28 lines
2141 bytes
2141 bytes
Trev wrote: > > On Sun, 29 Oct 2000 21:38:40 GMT, trevor.roberts@dunelm.org.uk (Trev) > wrote: > > >On Sun, 29 Oct 2000 21:27:43 GMT, trevor.roberts@dunelm.org.uk (Trev) > >wrote: > >>Trev - wondering if the ITS have got it in for him... > > Obviously only when I attempt to start a new thread. How bizarre... > > /me considers attaching the goats rant to this thread... > >-- > >Trev, intrigued... > > Coo, now this didn't go through. I think I'll try an experiment... > > j.s.radcliffe@dur.ac.uk > > Now we'll see... > Bad Trev. -- Dunc - wonders if we can create UNRS by posting using Durham addressed... When they see us coming the birdies all try n hide, But they still go for peanuts when coated in cyanide. -Tom Lehrer
Re: John Cusack
Author: Trev
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 23:16
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 23:16
22 lines
1981 bytes
1981 bytes
On Sun, 29 Oct 2000 23:03:25 +0000, HJ Leek <H.J.Leek@durham.ac.uk> wrote: >David Nutter wrote: >> HJ Leek <H.J.Leek@durham.ac.uk> writes: >> > Gandalf wrote: >> > > : I'll let you off. >> > > I won't >> > > See me in my office after class please Miss Leek >> > > </dodgy headmaster> >> > I's vewwy sowwy Mr Headmaster sir. </sweet, innocent (if twee) child> >> IT'S POSSESSED! KILL IT! >You want to hurt me??!! >Oo-er... Please, not on the newsgroup. Definitely not on an external newsgroup. And besides, wanting to kill you is something felt by all of us from time to time. -- Trev - safe in the knowledge he is no longer in Durham. Finally.
Re: John Cusack
Author: Trev
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 23:20
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 23:20
24 lines
1891 bytes
1891 bytes
On Sun, 29 Oct 2000 23:15:50 +0000, Dunc <Duncan.Taylor@dunelm.org.uk> wrote: >Trev wrote: >> Coo, now this didn't go through. I think I'll try an experiment... >> >> j.s.radcliffe@dur.ac.uk >> >> Now we'll see... >> >Bad Trev. Why bad? I was just wondering if it checked the whole post for Durham addresses, to see if they were replies to DUrham users. It would be a stupid thing to do, and they don't, so far as I can see. >Dunc - wonders if we can create UNRS by posting using Durham >addresses... That would be bad. Hmm... kieron.bridges@durham.ac.uk has it's possibilities, though. -- Trev - wouldn't do that sort of thing, oh no.
Re: John Cusack
Author: HJ Leek
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 23:22
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 23:22
31 lines
2253 bytes
2253 bytes
Trev wrote: > > On Sun, 29 Oct 2000 23:03:25 +0000, HJ Leek <H.J.Leek@durham.ac.uk> > wrote: > >David Nutter wrote: > >> HJ Leek <H.J.Leek@durham.ac.uk> writes: > >> > Gandalf wrote: > >> > > : I'll let you off. > >> > > I won't > >> > > See me in my office after class please Miss Leek > >> > > </dodgy headmaster> > >> > I's vewwy sowwy Mr Headmaster sir. </sweet, innocent (if twee) child> > >> IT'S POSSESSED! KILL IT! > >You want to hurt me??!! > >Oo-er... > > Please, not on the newsgroup. Definitely not on an external > newsgroup. > > And besides, wanting to kill you is something felt by all of us from > time to time. > > Trev - safe in the knowledge he is no longer in Durham. Finally. You'll be back, you fool. You know you will. And then you'll be sorry!!! HJ -- We are all dead men on leave. - Eugene Levine
Re: John Cusack
Author: Trev
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 23:32
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 23:32
12 lines
1715 bytes
1715 bytes
On Sun, 29 Oct 2000 23:22:26 +0000, HJ Leek <H.J.Leek@durham.ac.uk> wrote: >Trev wrote: >> Trev - safe in the knowledge he is no longer in Durham. Finally. > >You'll be back, you fool. You know you will. And then you'll be >sorry!!! That's what you think. I'm moving to Bristol. In two days time! -- Trev - surprised.
Re: John Cusack
Author: Dunc
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 23:43
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 23:43
25 lines
2289 bytes
2289 bytes
Trev wrote: > > On Sun, 29 Oct 2000 22:36:11 +0000, Dunc <Duncan.Taylor@dunelm.org.uk> > wrote: > >Trev wrote: > >> On Sun, 29 Oct 2000 21:27:43 GMT, trevor.roberts@dunelm.org.uk (Trev) > >> wrote: > >> >Trev - wondering if the ITS have got it in for him... > >> > > >> Obviously only when I attempt to start a new thread. How bizarre... > >> /me considers attaching the goats rant to this thread... > >Replying to yourself, first sign of spod overdosing. :) > > I was just testing... I'm beginning to think they just toss a coin > every time an external post tries to get in to Durham. Either that or > their newsserver is being particularly crap. > Or they are supposed to block external posts and they are being crap. :) -- Dunc When they see us coming the birdies all try n hide, But they still go for peanuts when coated in cyanide. -Tom Lehrer
Re: John Cusack
Author: Trev
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 23:46
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 23:46
8 lines
1410 bytes
1410 bytes
On Sun, 29 Oct 2000 23:43:34 +0000, Dunc <Duncan.Taylor@dunelm.org.uk> wrote: >Or they are supposed to block external posts and they are being crap. :) > But why would anyone want to block us? We're lovely... -- Trev
Re: John Cusack
Author: Dunc
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 23:49
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 23:49
19 lines
2087 bytes
2087 bytes
Trev wrote: > > On Sun, 29 Oct 2000 22:46:11 GMT, trevor.roberts@dunelm.org.uk (Trev) > wrote: > > I was just testing... I'm beginning to think they just toss a coin > >every time an external post tries to get in to Durham. Either that or > >their newsserver is being particularly crap. > > They do just toss a coin! Mine got through, yours didn't! I'm not > impressed, specially as my goats one hasn't got through. *sigh* > But will my reply to the goats get through before the post itself? -- Dunc When they see us coming the birdies all try n hide, But they still go for peanuts when coated in cyanide. -Tom Lehrer
Re: John Cusack
Author: Trev
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 23:53
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 23:53
22 lines
1951 bytes
1951 bytes
On Sun, 29 Oct 2000 23:49:01 +0000, Dunc <Duncan.Taylor@dunelm.org.uk> wrote: >Trev wrote: >> >> On Sun, 29 Oct 2000 22:46:11 GMT, trevor.roberts@dunelm.org.uk (Trev) >> wrote: >> > I was just testing... I'm beginning to think they just toss a coin >> >every time an external post tries to get in to Durham. Either that or >> >their newsserver is being particularly crap. >> >> They do just toss a coin! Mine got through, yours didn't! I'm not >> impressed, specially as my goats one hasn't got through. *sigh* >> >But will my reply to the goats get through before the post itself? Who knows? The excitement mounts... None of these are getting through, BTW. Well, not so far. -- Trev
Re: John Cusack
Author: Jenny Radcliffe
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 09:21
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 09:21
14 lines
1865 bytes
1865 bytes
Trev <trevor.roberts@dunelm.org.uk> wrote > On Sun, 29 Oct 2000 23:22:26 +0000, HJ Leek <H.J.Leek@durham.ac.uk> > wrote: > >Trev wrote: > >> Trev - safe in the knowledge he is no longer in Durham. Finally. > >You'll be back, you fool. You know you will. And then you'll be > >sorry!!! > That's what you think. I'm moving to Bristol. In two days time! No! You're kidding? -- Not nececelery
Re: John Cusack
Author: David Nutter
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 10:21
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 10:21
23 lines
1643 bytes
1643 bytes
HJ Leek <H.J.Leek@durham.ac.uk> writes: > David Nutter wrote: > > > > HJ Leek <H.J.Leek@durham.ac.uk> writes: > > > > > I's vewwy sowwy Mr Headmaster sir. </sweet, innocent (if twee) child> > > > > IT'S POSSESSED! KILL IT! > > > You want to hurt me??!! Ah, the demon has left you, returning your speech to normal. *puts down pitchfork and flaming torch* Regards, -david -- David Nutter | We Like Zippy! My mind is making ashtrays in Dayton....
Re: John Cusack
Author: HJ Leek
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 10:37
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 10:37
15 lines
1742 bytes
1742 bytes
Trev wrote: > > On Sun, 29 Oct 2000 23:22:26 +0000, HJ Leek <H.J.Leek@durham.ac.uk> > wrote: > >Trev wrote: > >> Trev - safe in the knowledge he is no longer in Durham. Finally. > > > >You'll be back, you fool. You know you will. And then you'll be > >sorry!!! > > That's what you think. I'm moving to Bristol. In two days time! > Meep!!!! How come??? HJ
Re: John Cusack
Author: Curtains
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 10:50
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 10:50
16 lines
1925 bytes
1925 bytes
Jenny Radcliffe wrote: > > Trev <trevor.roberts@dunelm.org.uk> wrote > > On Sun, 29 Oct 2000 23:22:26 +0000, HJ Leek <H.J.Leek@durham.ac.uk> > > wrote: > > >Trev wrote: > > >> Trev - safe in the knowledge he is no longer in Durham. Finally. > > >You'll be back, you fool. You know you will. And then you'll be > > >sorry!!! > > That's what you think. I'm moving to Bristol. In two days time! > > No! You're kidding? That's sort of where I live :-P
Re: John Cusack
Author: Jenny Radcliffe
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 10:51
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 10:51
18 lines
2217 bytes
2217 bytes
Curtains <J.C.Curtis@durham.ac.uk> wrote > Jenny Radcliffe wrote: > > Trev <trevor.roberts@dunelm.org.uk> wrote > > > On Sun, 29 Oct 2000 23:22:26 +0000, HJ Leek <H.J.Leek@durham.ac.uk> > > > wrote: > > > >Trev wrote: > > > >> Trev - safe in the knowledge he is no longer in Durham. Finally. > > > >You'll be back, you fool. You know you will. And then you'll be > > > >sorry!!! > > > That's what you think. I'm moving to Bristol. In two days time! > > No! You're kidding? > That's sort of where I live :-P Yes, me too, so what? I'm not criticising - just wondering why Trev's going there. -- "We're doing it together this time" Phil Hurt
Re: John Cusack
Author: A J Knighton
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 12:02
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 12:02
11 lines
1453 bytes
1453 bytes
Dunc (Duncan.Taylor@dunelm.org.uk) wrote: : A J Knighton wrote: : > Actually, I'e lost myself somewhere in the semantics there. If anyone can : > find the point I'd be grateful. : > : Here it is. : Dunc pokes Andy with the point. Get away from me, you disgusting young man. Andy K.
Re: John Cusack
Author: A J Knighton
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 12:05
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 12:05
12 lines
1656 bytes
1656 bytes
Kate (K.J.Dobson@durham.ac.uk) wrote: : You're trying to work again aren't you Andy? Trying and only partially failing. On the one hand, I've written fifteen hundred words on the Somertone protesters and the fallout from the battle of Boroughbridge. On the other hand I've rearranged the kitchen, made an interesting compilation tape, been shopping twice, watched half of Wild Palms, and spent some time staring at the carpet. All while working on my plans for world domination. Andy K.
Re: John Cusack
Author: A J Knighton
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 12:07
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 12:07
9 lines
1221 bytes
1221 bytes
Gandalf (I.S.Davis@durham.ac.uk) wrote: : NOW LOOK HERE! : THIS IS A RESPECTABLE NEWSGROUP FOR RESPECTABLE PEOPLE I beg to differ. Andy K.
Re: John Cusack
Author: Kate
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 12:19
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 12:19
21 lines
1972 bytes
1972 bytes
A J Knighton wrote: > > Kate (K.J.Dobson@durham.ac.uk) wrote: > > : You're trying to work again aren't you Andy? > > Trying and only partially failing. On the one hand, I've written fifteen > hundred words on the Somertone protesters and the fallout from the battle > of Boroughbridge. On the other hand I've rearranged the kitchen, made an > interesting compilation tape, been shopping twice, watched half of Wild > Palms, and spent some time staring at the carpet. All while working on my > plans for world domination. Pretty normal day there then. -- Nick Bradbeer is the smoothest person I know. He's the kind of person who, if you ground up, would be very good as gear oil. Dave Nutter.
Re: John Cusack
Author: Kate
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 12:20
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 12:20
14 lines
1674 bytes
1674 bytes
> > DISCLAIMER: > > I, in no way, shape or form suggested, hinted, insinuated, implied or > attempted to establish that Kimmy was a goat. > > It was all Gandalf - :p You are all in soo much trouble!!!! -- Nick Bradbeer is the smoothest person I know. He's the kind of person who, if you ground up, would be very good as gear oil. Dave Nutter.
Re: John Cusack
Author: Kate
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 12:21
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 12:21
18 lines
1674 bytes
1674 bytes
A J Knighton wrote: > > Gandalf (I.S.Davis@durham.ac.uk) wrote: > > : NOW LOOK HERE! > > : THIS IS A RESPECTABLE NEWSGROUP FOR RESPECTABLE PEOPLE > > I beg to differ. Well yes you're on here for one. How are the sratch marks? -- Nick Bradbeer is the smoothest person I know. He's the kind of person who, if you ground up, would be very good as gear oil. Dave Nutter.
Re: John Cusack
Author: A J Knighton
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 12:27
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 12:27
24 lines
1735 bytes
1735 bytes
Kate (K.J.Dobson@durham.ac.uk) wrote: : A J Knighton wrote: : > : > Gandalf (I.S.Davis@durham.ac.uk) wrote: : > : > : NOW LOOK HERE! : > : > : THIS IS A RESPECTABLE NEWSGROUP FOR RESPECTABLE PEOPLE : > : > I beg to differ. : Well yes you're on here for one. Pah! I am a light of virtue and righteousness compared withour glorious president, not to mention certain long-nailed psychopaths I could mention. And then there's Trev. : How are the sratch marks? Turning septic. And my fingers have started dropping off. Andy K.
Re: John Cusack
Author: Dunc
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 15:24
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 15:24
25 lines
2209 bytes
2209 bytes
David Nutter wrote: > > HJ Leek <H.J.Leek@durham.ac.uk> writes: > > > David Nutter wrote: > > > > > > HJ Leek <H.J.Leek@durham.ac.uk> writes: > > > > > > > I's vewwy sowwy Mr Headmaster sir. </sweet, innocent (if twee) child> > > > > > > IT'S POSSESSED! KILL IT! > > > > > You want to hurt me??!! > > Ah, the demon has left you, returning your speech to normal. > > *puts down pitchfork and flaming torch* > <picks them up and goes off whistling> -- Dunc When they see us coming the birdies all try n hide, But they still go for peanuts when coated in cyanide. -Tom Lehrer
Page 1 of 3 • 142 total messages
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads