🚀 go-pugleaf

Its your word against mine,and what makes you think yours is right?
Your opinion!
My opinion was that is was useless information and would I state my opinion
without thinking it was right.?

Not every one in this world has a dependency on medical
insurance,governments and irrelevant hyraces in which majority has
prevalence.
That means smart people work alone,without pimping..and will take you for
who you are,dumb,smart,idiot and adapt a reception to suit you and teach you
more than you currently know.
This means that trolling the same information without thought to a new
attack is just plain idiotic when you never bothered to know exactly who you
where dealing with,but just thought well everyone is a dick.


In other words your opinion means nothing to me just as my opinion means
nothing to you.





"Floyd Davidson" <floyd@barrow.com> wrote in message
news:87oeykxrm1.fld@barrow.com...
> "CyBorg 0091" <non@no.na> wrote:
> >Not helpfull information.
>
> Actually, that is *extremely* helpful information.
>
> Let me amplify it a little...
>
> >"Gary R. Schmidt" <grschmidt@acm.org> wrote:
> >> geo wrote:
> >> > "Davo" <dgwood@optushome.com.au> wrote:
> >> >>I am looking for active newsgroups, productive user
> >> >>friendly tutorials, good weblinks, and local private tutors
> >> >>(Melbourne Australia) in the programming language C. The
> >> >>two news groups athome.aus.programming and
> >> >>athome.aus.programming.c++ dont seem to have much
> >> >>activity. Any information or advice will be much
> >> >>appreciated.
> ...
> >> > comp.lang.c
> >> > comp.lang.c++
> ...
> >> But read them both for a couple of weeks before you post any questions,
> >> and for Bog's sake - READ THE BLOODY FAQS FOR THE GROUPS FIRST!!!!
>
> The comp.lang.c newsgroup is frequented by a large group of
> *exceedingly* experienced people.  They are experienced not only
> in C programming, but in Usenet use and abuse.  They are, as a
> group, just about the most anal retentive bunch of die hard do
> it right or else bunch of pedantic experts available on the net.
>
> And there *is* good cause for it.  The group would be useless if
> it were allowed to degenerate into the morass of slop that most
> of Usenet has become.  (Not to say that they don't ever go
> overboard, because they do!  Often... :-) Whatever, the whole
> point of posting there is to get someone to pick your code to
> pieces and tell you everything that is wrong with it.  And they
> will too.
>
> Put it this way...  Dennis Ritchie had the audacity to post a
> somewhat off topic article (about the _history_ of the C
> programming language, not about using it) to comp.lang.c a
> couple years ago, and Richard Heathfield had the brass to post a
> reply that simply said "Yeah, but what's your C question?"
>
> If they'll give DMR (who invented C) a hard time, just think
> what they'll do to *you*, if you don't follow the rules!
>
> Read the group and be *well* aware of how to ask appropriate
> questions, be aware of what is not appropriate, and be aware of
> how to format your articles.  Do read the FAQ and do *not* post
> questions that are answered in the FAQ or in the appropriate man
> page unless you have read those and do not understand them (and
> do make that clear in the article).
>
> Probably the best way to make use of comp.lang.c is via google.
> Pay particular attention to Larry Kirby, Chris Torek, Doug Gywn,
> Richard Heathfield, Steve Summit, Dan Pop, and Clive Feather.
> (And my apologies to half a dozen others that belong in the
> list too.)
>
> -- 
> Floyd L. Davidson           <http://web.newsguy.com/floyd_davidson>
> Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska)                         floyd@barrow.com