Article View: alt.engineering.nuclear
Article #159Re: Disposal of Radioactive Waste
From: none Quarks like a duck
Date: Sun, 04 Jun 2000 00:00
Date: Sun, 04 Jun 2000 00:00
61 lines
4759 bytes
4759 bytes
"Dewey & Lucy Thompson" <dlthompson@socket.net> wrote: >> Ha ha ha! Never realized what a daredevil I was, maneuvering those water >> heating panels onto my roof. And they're even heavier than PV panels. >> Heaven help us if we have to build nukes due to the risk of plunging PV >> installers. With enough people worrying about such risks, we'll end up >with >> warning labels on paint cans saying "not for internal use". Oh wait, >that's >> already happened.............. >Actually, Murray makes quite a salient point. When you are looking at risk, >you really should evaluate ALL risks. When you "wrestled" those heavy cans >to your roof, you were doing something that you felt was beneficial. >Perhaps it will bring personal satisfaction to you, perhaps it will bring >more disposeable income to your pocket. >You DID however take an additional risk to yourself and your family. Had >you been aware of those risks, you might or might not have followed through >with the job. You chose to take that risk upon your self, and that is fine >with me. >BUT. Let us contemplate legislating the use of PV panels on all homes. >This action would increase risks to the workforce, and PV installers would >fall, some would be hurt, some would be killed. That is a price. Just like >coal miners. Ever read a story about "Fire in Mine, 31 coal miners killed". >It happens. What do you think when you read this story? Most people think >"Well of course, they work in a dangerous occupation". >If a PV installer falls off of a roof, what will you think? Most people >think "Well of course, he worked in a dangerous occupation". >Now, consider the headlines, oh let's look at one from the recent (Febuary) >Steam Generator Tube Leak at the Indian point nuclear station. That >incident was a "non event". No one was hurt, the off-site radioactivity >release was so small to be less than trivial, about two puffs on a cigarette >worth of lifetime risk. The plant worked precisely as it was designed. >So what did people think when they see the headline? Too many people think >that "Nuclear is going to kill us all". >THAT is the problem. With nuclear, there are risks. With coal there are >risks. With PV there are risks. These risks need to be evaluated >scientifically, not emotionally. Recent scientific studies show Chernobyl was far worse than previously thought. Thousands have died and millions effected. And you expect people not to get emotional? Eat my shorts. >> >> Wayne- "for my next death-defying feat, I'll swing a paint brush from a >> ladder" <G> >Suggestion, go out and purchase or rent scaffolding. >My brother-in-law just fell from his ladder painting his house. He ended up >breaking his toe, luckily he did not break his leg or back. >dewey
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<8hdv8e$n6b$3@nntp9.atl.mindspring.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<8f2n6g$61p$1@nntp9.atl.mindspring.net> <39162523@news.rivernet.com.au> <957754941.595999@server.tarms.com> <shf6v3i05uh22@corp.supernews.com> <39186F24.9D1EBB6A@tcac.net> <957915161.274368@server.tarms.com> <8fa92n$f2i$1@slb3.atl.mindspring.net> <8F30661E4bnesheimonlineno@148.122.208.74> <_RcS4.38598$Xk2.139664@tor-nn1.netcom.ca> <8F3097C58bnesheimonlineno@148.122.208.74> <OQdS4.38606$Xk2.139672@tor-nn1.netcom.ca> <958003425.891133@server.tarms.com> <8fcukc$ <391C48E0.27163060@boeing.com> <N4mT4.40348$Xk2.143903@tor-nn1.netcom.ca> <hlVX4.6296$Ym2.167177@typhoon2.ba-dsg.net> <8h0paj$dqu$1@slb3.atl.mindspring.net> <39345a3a.58079449@news.bigpond.com> <8h3kjd$h2l$1@slb6.atl.mindspring.net> <_5qZ4.5999$N4.227441@ozemail.com.au> <3936406C.2C10949E@compuserve.com> <DvyZ4.105047$R4.612391@news1.rdc1.nj.home.com> <MR5_4.7628$N4.283206@ozemail.com.au> <pom_4.6336$F9.210198@news1.gvcl1.bc.home.com> <iyt_4.214$N25.42270@news-west.eli.net> <sjkttood5ri181@corp.supernews.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10ecc0,76584cf5b626f783 X-Google-Attributes: gid10ecc0,public X-Google-Thread: 107e5d,76584cf5b626f783 X-Google-Attributes: gid107e5d,public X-Google-Thread: 10c480,76584cf5b626f783 X-Google-Attributes: gid10c480,public X-Google-Thread: 102359,76584cf5b626f783 X-Google-Attributes: gid102359,public X-Google-Thread: fb19c,76584cf5b626f783 X-Google-Attributes: gidfb19c,public X-Google-Thread: 10df0c,76584cf5b626f783 X-Google-Attributes: gid10df0c,public From: none (Quarks like a duck) Subject: Re: Disposal of Radioactive Waste Date: 2000/06/04 Message-ID: <8hdv8e$n6b$3@nntp9.atl.mindspring.net> X-Deja-AN: 630939649 References: <8f2n6g$61p$1@nntp9.atl.mindspring.net> <39162523@news.rivernet.com.au> <957754941.595999@server.tarms.com> <shf6v3i05uh22@corp.supernews.com> <39186F24.9D1EBB6A@tcac.net> <957915161.274368@server.tarms.com> <8fa92n$f2i$1@slb3.atl.mindspring.net> <8F30661E4bnesheimonlineno@148.122.208.74> <_RcS4.38598$Xk2.139664@tor-nn1.netcom.ca> <8F3097C58bnesheimonlineno@148.122.208.74> <OQdS4.38606$Xk2.139672@tor-nn1.netcom.ca> <958003425.891133@server.tarms.com> <8fcukc$ <391C48E0.27163060@boeing.com> <N4mT4.40348$Xk2.143903@tor-nn1.netcom.ca> <hlVX4.6296$Ym2.167177@typhoon2.ba-dsg.net> <8h0paj$dqu$1@slb3.atl.mindspring.net> <39345a3a.58079449@news.bigpond.com> <8h3kjd$h2l$1@slb6.atl.mindspring.net> <_5qZ4.5999$N4.227441@ozemail.com.au> <3936406C.2C10949E@compuserve.com> <DvyZ4.105047$R4.612391@news1.rdc1.nj.home.com> <MR5_4.7628$N4.283206@ozemail.com.au> <pom_4.6336$F9.210198@news1.gvcl1.bc.home.com> <iyt_4.214$N25.42270@news-west.eli.net> <sjkttood5ri181@corp.supernews.com> X-Server-Date: 4 Jun 2000 16:14:06 GMT Organization: MindSpring Enterprises, Inc. Reply-To: your mom Newsgroups: alt.engineering.nuclear,aus.environment.misc,aus.politics,sci.energy,sci.engr.mining,sci.environment.waste