🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: alt.engineering.nuclear
Article #183

Re: Disposal of Radioactive Waste

#183
From: Steve Spence
Date: Mon, 08 May 2000 00:00
65 lines
3519 bytes
uninhabitable to whom?

--
--
Steve Spence
Renewable Energy Pages - http://www.webconx.com
Palm Pilot Pages - http://www.webconx.com/palm
X10 Home Automation - http://www.webconx.com/x10
sspence@webconx.com
(212) 894-3704 x3154 - voicemail/fax
If we don't believe in freedom of speech
for people who we disagree with, we don't believe in it at all.
--

"TJ" <tjlim@telpacific.com.au> wrote in message
news:39162523@news.rivernet.com.au...
> There is so much land that is totally uninhabitable in Australia. Why
cannot
> we allocate these sections to house these nuclear waste for sizeble cost.
We
> sell these spaces and ensure that stringent standards are imposed for
> dumping such waste here. There are lots of revenue from overseas to be
> earned here.
> <none (Quarks like a duck)> wrote in message
> news:8f2n6g$61p$1@nntp9.atl.mindspring.net...
> > That is old thinking here in the US. Volunteer communities get
> > educated too quickly on the industry's inabilty to solve the waste
> > problem. I watched many low-level waste communities volunteer and then
> > reject the idea soon after.
> >
> >
> >
> > "Ian Mair" <rimair@melbpc.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > >The following paper has been added to the web site of the Australian
> Academy
> > >of Technological Sciences and Engineering. It may be viewed by
following
> the
> > >links from http://www.atse.org.au/
> >
> > >"Some Aspects of the Relationship Between Society and the Disposal of
> > >Radioactive Waste", Mr Ian Duncan FTSE
> >
> > >Society accepts that its demands for materials, energy and transport
all
> > >create wastes, and yet no community will willingly absorb its share of
> > >waste, let alone accept a regional or national share. Community
rejection
> of
> > >such a burden is exemplified by the NIMBY ('not in my back-yard')
> > >phenomenon. Recent examination of NIMBY suggests that it could be the
> child
> > >of 'top down' siting decisions usually based upon a 'decide, announce
and
> > >defend (DAD)' policy. There are indications now that a counter culture
of
> > >'volunteer communities' could mitigate or even overcome this rejection
> > >process.
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
Technical Details
Message-ID: <LWwR4.54953$R4.276555@news1.rdc1.nj.home.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <8f1vof$fas$1@possum.melbpc.org.au> <8f2n6g$61p$1@nntp9.atl.mindspring.net> <39162523@news.rivernet.com.au>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10ecc0,76584cf5b626f783
X-Google-Attributes: gid10ecc0,public
X-Google-Thread: 107e5d,76584cf5b626f783
X-Google-Attributes: gid107e5d,public
X-Google-Thread: 10df0c,76584cf5b626f783
X-Google-Attributes: gid10df0c,public
X-Google-Thread: 102359,76584cf5b626f783
X-Google-Attributes: gid102359,public
X-Google-Thread: fb19c,76584cf5b626f783
X-Google-Attributes: gidfb19c,public
X-Google-Thread: 10c480,76584cf5b626f783
X-Google-Attributes: gid10c480,public
From: "Steve Spence" <steve.spence@home.com>
Subject: Re: Disposal of Radioactive Waste
Date: 2000/05/08
Message-ID: <LWwR4.54953$R4.276555@news1.rdc1.nj.home.com>
X-Deja-AN: 620602230
References: <8f1vof$fas$1@possum.melbpc.org.au> <8f2n6g$61p$1@nntp9.atl.mindspring.net> <39162523@news.rivernet.com.au>
X-Priority: 3
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700
X-Complaints-To: abuse@home.net
X-Trace: news1.rdc1.nj.home.com 957782827 24.9.95.2 (Mon, 08 May 2000 03:47:07 PDT)
Organization: WebConX Inc.
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Reply-To: "Steve Spence" <sspence@webconx.com>
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 08 May 2000 03:47:07 PDT
Newsgroups: alt.engineering.nuclear,aus.environment.misc,aus.politics,sci.energy,sci.engr.mining,sci.environment.waste