Article View: alt.engineering.nuclear
Article #47Why Decentralized Power? [was Re:Disposal of Radioactive Waste]
From: D.A.Kopf
Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2000 00:00
Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2000 00:00
30 lines
2796 bytes
2796 bytes
[New thread since References line becoming too long for my news mailer] Murray Love wrote in message I0%_4.7705$F9.266005@news1.gvcl1.bc.home.com... <snip> > > Thoughtful post, ant. Thank you for being civil. As an aside, I don't see > the attraction of decentralized power. I like my huge utility; it never > goes out on me, it's cheap, and if there's a problem I know who's > responsible. This is a genuine question: what is the attraction of > decentralization? Possibly it's too cheap, in that people can use unnecessary electricity without realizing the hidden consequences. Particularly in the workplace when they don't see the electric bill. I've known people using electric heaters under their desk because the air conditioning was set too cold! You'd probably reduce consumption if you had to do your own maintenance, or if your local plant made less noise and smelly emissions whenever you switched off a load. In my experience most of this reduction is effortless - turning off lights, replacing most-used lights with fluorescents, using battery-powered or wind-up clocks, plugging wall warts and always-on appliances into switchable outlets, etc. A substantial tax on grid power might also lead to usage reductions. Here in the US half the pump price of gasoline goes to tax monies which typically by law can only be used for transportation. If something similar were done with an electricity tax the revenue could stimulate all forms of energy research. There is also the self-sufficiency factor; where I live a major hurricane or ice storm will will pass through every few years and typically cut grid power for 1-2 weeks. For me, having power during those times more than makes up for several years of PV system maintenance.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<393D0963.ADC7BF03@dakx.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10ecc0,b1bfb5fdd7e3ed91,start X-Google-Attributes: gid10ecc0,public X-Google-Thread: 107e5d,b1bfb5fdd7e3ed91,start X-Google-Attributes: gid107e5d,public X-Google-Thread: 10df0c,b1bfb5fdd7e3ed91,start X-Google-Attributes: gid10df0c,public X-Google-Thread: fb19c,b1bfb5fdd7e3ed91,start X-Google-Attributes: gidfb19c,public X-Google-Thread: 102359,b1bfb5fdd7e3ed91,start X-Google-Attributes: gid102359,public X-Google-Thread: 10c480,b1bfb5fdd7e3ed91,start X-Google-Attributes: gid10c480,public From: "D.A.Kopf" <dak@dakx.com> Subject: Why Decentralized Power? [was Re:Disposal of Radioactive Waste] Date: 2000/06/06 Message-ID: <393D0963.ADC7BF03@dakx.com> X-Deja-AN: 631724805 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: DAKX, LLC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: dak@dakx.com Newsgroups: alt.engineering.nuclear,aus.environment.misc,aus.politics,sci.energy,sci.engr.mining,sci.environment.waste