Re: Rude Employee of Hong Kong Dragon Airline (Associate of Cathay Pacific )

Article View: alt.flame.airlines

Article #30

Back to alt.flame.airlines Previous Next

#30

From: Michael Voight
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 1999 00:00

18 lines
1514 bytes

If a person is going to apologize, they generally don't need to be asked
to do so.
Did you twist here arm and tell her to say she was sorry?

The Bill Mattocks wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 05 Jan 1999 18:21:48 GMT, John Wong <mutsy@flash.net> wrote:
> 
> >I asked her to apologize for her remark, but she
> >was rude enough to say �Why should I apologize to you�.
> 
> Oh, RUDE!  I thought you said "NUDE."  That's very different.
> 
> Nevermind.
> 
> Best Regards,
> 
> Bill Mattocks

Technical Details

Message-ID: <369541FE.A31CC9A8@cisco.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <3692590F.70FF1ECE@flash.net> <36952482.5969983@news.dimensional.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
X-Google-Thread: 103cf8,e23814edebf15ada
X-Google-Attributes: gid103cf8,public
X-Google-Thread: 113ee0,e23814edebf15ada
X-Google-Attributes: gid113ee0,public
X-Google-Thread: 110960,e23814edebf15ada
X-Google-Attributes: gid110960,public
X-Google-Thread: 105d85,e23814edebf15ada
X-Google-Attributes: gid105d85,public
X-Google-Thread: 102247,e23814edebf15ada
X-Google-Attributes: gid102247,public
From: Michael Voight <mvoight@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: Rude Employee of Hong Kong Dragon Airline (Associate of Cathay  Pacific )
Date: 1999/01/07
Message-ID: <369541FE.A31CC9A8@cisco.com>
X-Deja-AN: 429989577
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
References: <3692590F.70FF1ECE@flash.net> <36952482.5969983@news.dimensional.com>
To: bmattock@dimensional.com
X-Accept-Language: en
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Organization: Cisco Systems, Inc.
Mime-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: alt.flame.airlines,soc.culture.hongkong,rec.travel.air,hk.rec.travel,rec.travel

Reply to Parent Message